Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What is the name of the model of mental disorder psychiatrists use in their daily practice, their teaching and research? Specify the original publication in which the model is set out as a series of testable propositions, and three seminal works in which its application is tested against the canons of science and in practice.
That wording sounds like it was lifted from a Home Advisor TV ad ...Specify the original publication in which the model is set out as a series of testable propositions, and three seminal works in which its application is tested against the canons of science and in practice.
I just want someone to answer the question. I would like three references that prove the chemical imbalance theory so I know it has validity..
What do you mean by "prove?" That anyone with psychiatric problems have chemical imbalances; or that all chemical imbalances will produce mental instability?I would like three references that prove the chemical imbalance theory
Some psychiatrists found they could use horse tranquilizers (thorazine) to sedate psychotic individuals. I would recommend learning the Gospel message to love one another as superior to tranquilizers and sedatives used to subdue mad men/women.What is the name of the model of mental disorder psychiatrists use in their daily practice, their teaching and research? Specify the original publication in which the model is set out as a series of testable propositions, and three seminal works in which its application is tested against the canons of science and in practice.
Why is it people diagnosed with schizophrenia can do better without drugs? The psychiatric publishing industry actively suppresses criticism. Doesn’t that go against science?
People diagnosed with schizophrenia as a whole do not usually do better without drugs. Since you are making a definitive statement, what is your proof of your claim? Not all drugs work the same way on different people so different drugs will give different results on different people. Drugs actually help a lot of schizophrenic people live relatively normal lives.
Criticism that is supported with evidence isn't suppressed by psychiatry.
Against science? Absolutely.The psychiatric publishing industry actively suppresses criticism. Doesn’t that go against science?
Could be that this is about you and that your particular condition doesnt conform to a medical model thats highly statistically valid.Myself. ....I....me....I ...I ...me....I....I....me...
This is true too.....But big pharma is an industry. So the science of making more money pushes aside the science of true medicine.
Myself. Psychiatry does suppress critics of psychiatry. Psychiatrists who criticize the prevailing model that is. I was diagnosed with accute schizophrenia in 2011. They the hospital had me on way above the recommended dose of an antipsychotic. I was on it for years. Began to question the diagnosis so I abruptly stopped the drugs and went into a withdrawal state. They instantly changed the diagnosis to schizoaffective disorder and put me on sodium valproate. I weaned off that slowly. Same as abilify. I have learned everything the hospital told me was opinion only not established fact. It is rubbish..
Could be that this is about you and that your particular condition doesnt conform to a medical model thats highly statistically valid.
Do you no longer have the symptoms that you had when you were first diagnosed? Are you living a boringly simple life with no symptoms of either condition?
No symptoms of either
The corruption is real.Why do discussion like this always turn to "big pharm's corruption"? I happen to like some of the new meds that have been developed recently. Does it cost a lot of money to bring a new medication to market after years of proving it both works and is safe to use?...yes it does. Do most of us have the option of staying with medications that are available in generic and paying very little instead of going with the newer better medications? Also yes. Would you like the medical world to back up 50 years and throw away all the discoveries that have entered the market since then? Well, I guess you have that option ... sticking with the older cheaper meds. Personally, I want the big pharm ... and little pharm companies to continue to research and develop newer and better medications....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?