Scientific Evidence for a Worldwide Flood

[Radrook]

Here is the evidence offered by this source:
Scientific Evidence for a Worldwide Flood

 

[Subduction Zone]

Here is the evidence offered by this source:
Scientific Evidence for a Worldwide Flood

That man is sadly very dishonest at best. He can do peer reviewed work, but none of his pro-flood garbage can pass the relatively low hudle of peer review.

But if you like you can bring up his claims one at a time. Or I can show you a single picture that refutes the flood, if you understand it.

 

[Maddox]

Top Ten Reasons Noah’s Flood is Mythology

 

[Radrook]

That man is sadly very dishonest at best. He can do peer reviewed work, but none of his pro-flood garbage can pass the relatively low hudle of peer review.

But if you like you can bring up his claims one at a time. Or I can show you a single picture that refutes the flood, if you understand it.

Peers are atheists and anti-biblically, fanatically opposed.

 

[Radrook]

Startling Evidence for Noah’s flood

Footprints and Sand ‘Dunes’ in a Grand Canyon Sandstone!
by Dr. Andrew A. Snelling and Dr. Steve Austin on December 1, 1992

Startling Evidence for Noah’s Flood

 

[AV1611VET]

Hmmm.

Both videos together are 53:03 minutes long.

Yet you respond 13 minutes later and say this:

That man is sadly very dishonest at best. He can do peer reviewed work, but none of his pro-flood garbage can pass the relatively low hudle of peer review.

But if you like you can bring up his claims one at a time. Or I can show you a single picture that refutes the flood, if you understand it.

Hmmm.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Peers are atheists and anti-biblically, fanatically opposed.

That is not true. Whoever told you that was lying. Why do you accept some science but believe this rather obvious liar?

And what about my second offer? If you can be honest I can show one picture that refutes the flood beliefs of the man you linked.

 

[Radrook]

That is not true. Whoever told you that was lying. Why do you accept some science but believe this rather obvious liar?

And what about my second offer? If you can be honest I can show one picture that refutes the flood beliefs of the man you linked.

Show the picture.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Hmmm.

Both videos together are 53:03 minutes long.

Yet you respond 13 minutes later and say this:Hmmm.

Do you think that I have never seen that before? The man is either a liar or an idiot and sadly the evidence indicates the former. A lack of knowledge can be cured with education. It is very hard to fix a liar.

 

[Radrook]

Do you think that I have never seen that before? The man js either a liar or an idiot and sadly the evidence indicates the former. A lack of knowledge can be cured with education. It is very hard to fix a liar.

What is the specific lie you are referring to?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Show the picture.

By going to this site and clicking on the picture two separate times you can get it to blow up by a factor of about 6 or more:

Goosenecks State Park - Wikipedia

 

[Subduction Zone]

What is the specific lie you are referring to?

Just about every claim that he made in that video. The man disgusts me. He can do geology. He has to know that he is lying. Why? I have no clue.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Radrook, when you are ready I will gladly discuss what can be seen in the picture that I linked.

 

[Speedwell]

Hmmm.

Both videos together are 53:03 minutes long.

Yet you respond 13 minutes later and say this:Hmmm.

LOL! Anyone who has participated in discussions like this for any length of time is well familiar with the work of the notorious Drs. Snelling & Austin. Those videos in particular are not new; many of us have seen them already.

 

[AV1611VET]

Do you think that I have never seen that before?

Yes.

 

[AV1611VET]

Those videos in particular are not new; many of us have seen them already.

Have you?

I'm going to guess you haven't.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Have you?

I'm going to guess you haven't.

How do you know that he hasn't?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Yes.

And as usual you are wrong. I know enough about that man to know that he is sadly lying. He knows that what he is spewing is wrong, and yet he does so. You have heard the phrase "lying for Jesus" before. It is demonstrable that he is doing this. As a Christian that a person believes that Jesus would be helped by that person lying for Jesus should get you mad at him too. Do you think that Jesus needs or would even want the lies of others in support of him?

 

[AV1611VET]

How do you know that he hasn't?

I don't.

But I'm going by personal experience.

Once a person becomes ... what the Bible calls ... "shipwrecked," then anything they say is automatically anathema to them, whether they read it or not.

I have over 3.6 million posts, and some people act like they've read every single one of them.

Take the case of [the late] Henry Morrison.

No matter what he says, he's wrong in their eyes, because after all, he was just a hydraulics engineer.

So some people act like they've read every one of his footnotes in his Defender's Study Bible.

Ditto for DI, ICR and Kent Hovind.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I don't.

So you can't and don't know, but instead are just jumping to an assumption. Got it.