Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Unfortunately, people here talk smack and act like experts; though, none are accepting the challenge, Kent Hovind will smoke them just like he has hundreds of secular scientist; of whom, put a small box around science and turn it into religion.
Unfortunately, people here talk smack and act like experts; though, none are accepting the challenge, Kent Hovind will smoke them just like he has hundreds of secular scientist; of whom, put a small box around science and turn it into religion.
Unfortunately, people here talk smack and act like experts; though, none are accepting the challenge, Kent Hovind will smoke them just like he has hundreds of secular scientist; of whom, put a small box around science and turn it into religion.
You know, while there are a few experts here, this is really more of a casual forum.
Then ask Hovind to join my Hovind on carbon dating thread.
http://www.christianforums.com/threads/hovind-on-carbon-dating.7897624/
This is stating more than the obvious; though, equating some here as "Mike Tyson" is hilarious!!!
With all the trash talking, this all of a sudden became "a casual forum" for only those who hold a certain opinion.
Is this part of what is called tolerance, where people are tolerant as long as you agree with their position?
Or you could challenge him, come on step up!!!
Well, other than quoting me out of context, if evolution were false we would see fossils of all life forms that have ever existed, in that period instead of only those unique to the Cambrian Period and before.
I certainly didn't mean to quote you out of context, I was simply interested in this view in your post.
Why wouldn't you see those life forms from which the life forms in the Cambrian evolved? Maybe I'm not understanding what you're saying, just asking for clarification.
Scientists have a powerful trump card at their disposal: evidence.Unfortunately, people here talk smack and act like experts; though, none are accepting the challenge, Kent Hovind will smoke them just like he has hundreds of secular scientist; of whom, put a small box around science and turn it into religion.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I believe there were a couple of relevant posts preceding the one you quoted, thus context was lost. It is the same question I have asked numerous times in many threads that I can't seem to get ansewred straightforward. Most discussions on evolution in the CF concern themselves for the most part details, completely ignoring the simple indisputable facts that reveal evolution; that is the description of the fossil record throughout geologic time as seen in the geologic column. Transition fossils are completely unnecessary to see this. If evolution were false, we would see fossils of all life forms that ever existed in all layers of sedimentary strata. The fact is we see them distributed in such a way that would be expected for evolution to occur. We do not see dinosaurs in the Silurian Period, or rabbits in the Triassic Period, or kangaroos in the Devonian Period.
There are no known direct ancestors from the pre-cambrian fossils to the Cambrian fossils.Please bear with me, I'm simply attempting to understand....and thank you for your patience.
I'm still not understanding why the direct ancestors of Cambrian life forms are not found in pre-Cambrian layers. Or are they?
There are no known direct ancestors from the pre-cambrian fossils to the Cambrian fossils.
Like, say, Thomas you mean?Scientists have a powerful trump card at their disposal: evidence.
As long as they can ask, beg, or demand evidence, they think they can sufficiently quiet a creationist.
And this is nothing new, as even the scientists in Jesus' time demanded evidence ...
For the same reason you guys debate us?Can anyone tell me why we should debate Hovind?
Please bear with me, I'm simply attempting to understand....and thank you for your patience.
I'm still not understanding why the direct ancestors of Cambrian life forms are not found in pre-Cambrian layers. Or are they?
For the same reason you guys debate us?
Unfortunately, people here talk smack and act like experts; though, none are accepting the challenge, Kent Hovind will smoke them just like he has hundreds of secular scientist; of whom, put a small box around science and turn it into religion.
There are no known direct ancestors from the pre-cambrian fossils to the Cambrian fossils.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?