I don't know what BobRyan means, but the concept that God created everything means everything. That includes spacetime itself and everything in it. If you mean how, I find it interesting that the account of creating Adam and Eve is very specific. That is really the problem between evolution and the bible.
What bothers me about evolution is that, by it's nature, it's based only on extrapolation. No one has witnessed one species evolve into another because human lifespan is not that long. We can witness adaptation and even mutation, but that's a long way from, say, observing a viable change in the number of chromosomes that is passed along to the next generation. Everything we see seems to increase the odds of evolution, and that's before we get to abiogenesis.
This is where such discussions tend to split to between viruses and random chance over several billion years. As an OEC, I have no problem with a universe and earth several billion years old. The problem with viruses is their ability to mix and match code, which means it's something very different from other life, and there's some debate whether viruses are alive at all. The problem with the random chance is that it assumes, by the existence of life, that the odds of abiogenesis and evolution are surmountable without producing any estimates on what the actual odds may be. There's questions on what the factors may be and the nuts and bolts of how it works and how abiogenesis could happen, so even the odds themselves are in question. It's essentially hand-waving the problem by saying "Well, we're here, aren't we?"
