It's a distinction only to the extent that no science is art, and some not-science is art. Not really a distinction worth making.I agree, but the phrase was not, "Art is everything." A distinction was being drawn. So would you agree art is at least a part of the distinction between science and not-science?
With science, you get reviewed by your peers. With art, you get reviewed by those who wish they were your peers.If so, what other distinctions would you add?
Upvote
0