ebia
Senior Contributor
- Jul 6, 2004
- 41,711
- 2,142
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- AU-Greens
Removing religion from the set of possible discussions is to tacitly support a position that marginalises relgion.Secularism, nobody arguing for or against any religious position = neutral ground.![]()
And Christians can't be students?You're right the question wasn't 'what can students survive' at all, it was why can't Christians.
We work harder to try to get our difficult students through their VCE than the state schools in our area. We certainly don't maintain our position by loosing the kids who will not achieve well. But then we aren't a posh private school.I'm so tired of hearing this Catholic school sycophancy, while my mother was head of student welfare she helped create a program to assist young mothers in getting their HSC, that first year they enrolled 6 girls and, later, 3 more girls under 16 years mid term who'd been expelled from Catholic schools. Private schools are concerned with their reputation first and foremost.
Oh, touchy.Do you teach the students these childish, semantic games in any of your classes?
I'm not suggesting teachers in state schools should be proselytizing.And that might be fine in a Catholic private school where the parents know what they are getting their children into. The expectation in enrolling at a public school is that the teachers are free to hold whatever religious belief they wish but are not to proselytize or interfere with a child's religious upbringing.
A school has not choice but to function in some of the roles of parent if it is to function.The state is not a parent.
Upvote
0