Well, do you think schools should be able to hit a kid every now and then?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
TrueQ said:I picked yeah, as a last resort. As insulting to humanity it is, violence has played a major rule in resolving practically every conflict ever. From the Cuban Missile Crisis to schoolkids arguing over candy.
evildead said:Well, do you think schools should be able to hit a kid every now and then?
CZzyzx41 said:First off think of how lawsuit-happy Americans tend to be nowadays. The first kid that got smacked would sue the teacher for physical assault.
On a more serious note I agree with many here that it is a responsibility of the parent and not the school administrator to deal out corporal punishment. I don't see how it's right for even parents but since they have responsibility let them take their free agency into their own hands (pun not intended). I think smacking a kid shows weakness on the parents part and it in no way teaches the child why what he did was wrong, only that if he does it someone will hit him. The first time he does it and doesn't get hit, guess what? All those years of spankings went down the tubes. Now he feels like he's been lied too and brutalized and it only fuels a fire that could lead to him repeating it further. If a child has a good understanding why something is wrong and are punished in a non-violent way for breaking that rule you'll get more out of it in the long run I believe. Be sharp but not violent.
E-beth said:Unfortuanately, however, there isn't any form of discipline that really works in schools anymore. You can't touch them, granted, but you can't really do anything else either.