• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

saved before the foundation?

bradfordl

Veteran
Mar 20, 2006
1,510
181
✟25,108.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
The bible says believe and you will be saved and not you will be aware of your salvation.
Therefore we can't have been saved before we believed.
You can say you were elected to be saved but you were not saved.
Salvation is an act of God, not an act of man. God is eternal, existing outside of time (since time itself is His creation), which is why the Word contains the portions quoted to you indicating the eternal nature of God's decree concerning the salvation of His own people. So from the perspective of the Author of salvation, it has been so from the foundation. Yes, from the perspective of us dim-sighted humans, there may be a point or period where an elect person becomes aware of the grace his Redeemer has bestowed upon him, purchased by the blood of the Son. From human perspective that might be thought of as the "time" we were saved, but the Lord included these scriptures for a reason. It must be that He wants us to comprehend to the best of our limited ability the eternal nature of His plan of redemption. Maybe because if we try to define Him by the finite limitations under which we exist, we tend to minimize the astounding greatness of His mercy, and conversely minimize the astounding putridity of our own sin.

So we can say what the Word says:

2Ti 1:9 Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began
 
  • Like
Reactions: edie19
Upvote 0

UMP

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2004
5,022
116
✟5,772.00
Faith
Christian
Salvation is an act of God, not an act of man. God is eternal, existing outside of time (since time itself is His creation), which is why the Word contains the portions quoted to you indicating the eternal nature of God's decree concerning the salvation of His own people. So from the perspective of the Author of salvation, it has been so from the foundation. Yes, from the perspective of us dim-sighted humans, there may be a point or period where an elect person becomes aware of the grace his Redeemer has bestowed upon him, purchased by the blood of the Son. From human perspective that might be thought of as the "time" we were saved, but the Lord included these scriptures for a reason. It must be that He wants us to comprehend to the best of our limited ability the eternal nature of His plan of redemption. Maybe because if we try to define Him by the finite limitations under which we exist, we tend to minimize the astounding greatness of His mercy, and conversely minimize the astounding putridity of our own sin.

So we can say what the Word says:

I've got to give an :amen: for that.
Thank you. I very much enjoy reading your posts!
 
Upvote 0

edie19

Legend
Site Supporter
Sep 5, 2005
20,810
10,316
69
NW Ohio (almost Michigan)
Visit site
✟136,291.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Salvation is an act of God, not an act of man. God is eternal, existing outside of time (since time itself is His creation), which is why the Word contains the portions quoted to you indicating the eternal nature of God's decree concerning the salvation of His own people. So from the perspective of the Author of salvation, it has been so from the foundation. Yes, from the perspective of us dim-sighted humans, there may be a point or period where an elect person becomes aware of the grace his Redeemer has bestowed upon him, purchased by the blood of the Son. From human perspective that might be thought of as the "time" we were saved, but the Lord included these scriptures for a reason. It must be that He wants us to comprehend to the best of our limited ability the eternal nature of His plan of redemption. Maybe because if we try to define Him by the finite limitations under which we exist, we tend to minimize the astounding greatness of His mercy, and conversely minimize the astounding putridity of our own sin.

So we can say what the Word says:

And all God's people say :amen:
 
Upvote 0

jer3119

Active Member
Dec 7, 2006
136
20
✟22,861.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I have no clue what else you believe, but going by nothing but this quote right here, I agree with you. We were elected unto salvation. It has been predestined. But "technically," we are not saved until that point in time that God has predestined us to be born again. If we were "saved" when we were elected, there would be no need to be born again. Once would have been enough. So I agree with you here (and I am as predestinarian as one can get!) The thing is, if you were elect before the foundation of the world, you WILL be born again. There is absolutely no chance that you won't.

If, as the others here seem to think, you are trying to prove that we are not elected based on the fact that we must be saved "in time," then this is wrong. But based on what you have said right here, I agree.:)

My sister here makes some excellent and most important points and I most certainly agree with her.

God, in His three most excellent and Holy Three persons, not only covenanted to choose certain persons, that is to elect them, before the foundation of the world, but praise His Holy Name, He covenanted to to actually do, in time, what He said He would do to make that salvation effectual. All of it is a part of salvation, and all of it is glorious. What nonsense to suggest that because God used time to accomplish some of it makes that part of it less glorious. It is to subtly suggest (not knowingly or intentionally, but by being deceived, or by remaining blindess or lack of light) that God's decree, in one part of it, is less glorious than another. It isn't.

To that end, the Son came and died, in time.

He also rose again, in time, and now sits at the right had of the Father interceding for us. It is all glorious, and a manifestation of His great wisdom. So much so that we are told that those glorious beings, the angels, "desire to look into these things". It is all a great and glorious display of His Wisdom and Power for all creation.

He also sent the Holy Spirit, in time, to regenerate, convict, give faith to repent and believe the gospel to each of those elect. He didn't just talk about it, didn't just agree to it, didn't just decree it, though all of that, because He is God, made it certain that he would do it, No, He actually did it and is doing it now, in whomsoever He chooses.

That same Holy Spirit does not only give faith to believe at initial conversion, but also at each point in the subsequent life to turn from sin and self and obey Him, and to "do His commandments". It is a glorious work, and Paul calls it "working out your salvation" because it is "He that works in you to will and to do of His good pleasure".

Salvation is a process that began in eternity past with the "everlasting covenant, ordered in all things and sure". "All things and sure", including all the things that will happen, in time, because of it.

God decreed all of it, not just the initial selection of whom, but also the how, and by "Whom". And that "Whom" the Son and the Spirit, do their precious work, in time, in the hearts of the elect.

And because they do so, those "elect" will produce fruit, good works, and not just the works of evangelism, but also of taking care of the poor, the blind and the widow and orphan, and the downtrodden and the oppressed and the poor. All of it are spoken of in the scripture, and all of it are Decreed and will be seen in the life of a true believer. He will "love the brethren" not with words only, but with his substance where he has it. These and many other fruits will be manifest in the life of a true believer. He may not do each of them, but His whole life will be changed and there will be fruit that can be seen, and it won't be a minor reformation and turning from gross sins only. No, the sins of the heart, the pride and the covetousness and lusts of the flesh, the appetites will also be hated and turned from.

Satan is a genius. If he can't get one to deny outright correct doctrine concerning foreknowledge, election, predestination, calling, justification, sanctification, and glorification, he will get one to emphasize one point over the other to the effect that while some aspects are spoken of with great supposed, and perhaps actual, reverence, other aspects are in effect denied, because they are belittled as being for example, done in time, as if God had not decreed this also, and as if they are not as important somehow as the original agreement.

Were there no time, there would be no creatures and no manhood of Christ to come and die for those creatures. These are just as glorious as God's choosing to elect some and not others.

Do not be confused by an apparent lack of emphasis by some here on what God's Word clearly emphasizes. For it is all a part of His Holy Word.

Christ himself, in His Gospels, warned again and again, and again, in parable after parable of those who would speak much and do little, who would be self deceived, and not "follow Him" and "obey His commandments". It is not enough to simply glorify His covenant in eternity past with words, though we should and must do that, for clearly, it is a most wonderful and glorious covenant, and we are right to point out that it all begins with Him, but it also ends With Him, for He is the Alpha, AND the Omega, not just the one or the other.

Thus, we must also, like Christ, who agreed to that covenant, go and do those things we have agreed to in coming to Him, in giving ourselves unreservedly to Him, just as He gave Himself to us.

Talk is cheap. How grateful I am that Christ did more than talk about it, but that He did what He promised, in living out the commandments of the Law, and then dying for my sins, and in sending His Spirit to teach me of this great sacrifice, and to empower me, by grace alone, and with much weakness and remaining sinfulness, to follow Him, to obey Him, to "endure to the end" that I might be "saved". For He said "He that endures to the end will be saved".

None other will.

Salvation, taken scripturally, deals with all of the above, not just one aspect of it. All if it is the Word of God, "every Word of God is pure", and only those who teach "the whole counsel of the Word of God" will be "free of the blood of all men". That is precisely why Paul used those very words. Because the "blood of all men" is at stake, (Acts 20:27 and context).



Much Christian love to you,
in Him,
jer3119
</IMG>
 
Upvote 0

Iosias

Senior Contributor
Jul 18, 2004
8,171
227
✟9,648.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
But "technically," we are not saved until that point in time that God has predestined us to be born again.

I would have to disagree with you here. Thomas Goodwin, Herman Witsius, William Twisse, John Brine, Herman Hoeksema and John Gill all accept eternal justification. We were justified from eternity.

See
1. http://www.mountzionpbc.org/John_Brine/JB_Eternal_Justification.htm
2. http://www.pbministries.org/books/gill/Sermons&Tracts/sermon_37.htm
3. http://www.pbministries.org/books/gill/Doctrinal_Divinity/Book_2/book2_05.htm
4. http://www.fpcr.org/blue_banner_articles/Justification2.htm
 
Upvote 0

bradfordl

Veteran
Mar 20, 2006
1,510
181
✟25,108.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Satan is a genius. If he can't get one to deny outright correct doctrine concerning foreknowledge, election, predestination, calling, justification, sanctification, and glorification, he will get one to emphasize one point over the other to the effect that while some aspects are spoken of with great supposed, and perhaps actual, reverence, other aspects are in effect denied, because they are belittled as being for example, done in time, as if God had not decreed this also, and as if they are not as important somehow as the original agreement. ....
Do not be confused by an apparent lack of emphasis by some here on what God's Word clearly emphasizes. For it is all a part of His Holy Word....
Christ himself, in His Gospels, warned again and again, and again, in parable after parable of those who would speak much and do little, who would be self deceived, and not "follow Him" and "obey His commandments". It is not enough to simply glorify His covenant in eternity past with words, though we should and must do that, for clearly, it is a most wonderful and glorious covenant, and we are right to point out that it all begins with Him, but it also ends With Him, for He is the Alpha, AND the Omega, not just the one or the other....
Sounds like you are making accusations against "some here", veiled though they may be. That's another specialty of Satan. Veiled accusations are the tool of those who either have no proof to substantiate their claims, or those who have not the courage to speak without subtlety. I exhort you, brother, to dispense with nefarious insinuations and, as a follower of Christ ought, state your case plainly.

Brad
 
Upvote 0

kimlva

Active Member
Nov 3, 2006
174
45
Virginia
✟23,035.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
I would have to disagree with you here. Thomas Goodwin, Herman Witsius, William Twisse, John Brine, Herman Hoeksema and John Gill all accept eternal justification. We were justified from eternity.

See
1. http://www.mountzionpbc.org/John_Brine/JB_Eternal_Justification.htm
2. http://www.pbministries.org/books/gill/Sermons&Tracts/sermon_37.htm
3. http://www.pbministries.org/books/gill/Doctrinal_Divinity/Book_2/book2_05.htm
4. http://www.fpcr.org/blue_banner_articles/Justification2.htm
Well, not that I really care what any of those people believe, lol. But I don't disagree with you here. But that does not negate the fact that we do indeed have to actually believe and be born again, in time. You do believe that there are certain things the elect WILL do because they are elect, don't you? I am seriously asking, because I know that there are those who believe that if you are of the elect, it doesn't matter how you live or what you do. I am not one of those. I believe that if you are elect from the foundation of the world, you WILL repent and believe at some point in your life, and you will also produce fruit in keeping with repentence.

I have a feeling this is another argument about words, however, and so I will bow out. I am not young enough to care for those anymore, lol.
 
Upvote 0

jer3119

Active Member
Dec 7, 2006
136
20
✟22,861.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I have a feeling this is another argument about words, however, and so I will bow out. I am not young enough to care for those anymore, lol.

Another excellent point, sister. Me either.

The only reason I made the post was I felt for that poor soul who had only heard a part of the truth, accompanied by all the "amens" and "hallelujahs" in the cheering section.

When we hear the truth spoken, we should stand for it and encourage others in it, even if it means we disturb our friends.

The Truth is precious and beautiful, and has it's own rewards.

Much Christian love to you and to all,
jer3119
 
Upvote 0

bradfordl

Veteran
Mar 20, 2006
1,510
181
✟25,108.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Another excellent point, sister. Me either.

The only reason I made the post was I felt for that poor soul who had only heard a part of the truth, accompanied by all the "amens" and "hallelujahs" in the cheering section.

When we hear the truth spoken, we should stand for it and encourage others in it, even if it means we disturb our friends.

The Truth is precious and beautiful, and has it's own rewards.

Much Christian love to you and to all,
jer3119
Guess you missed my last post, or chose to disregard it, so for your edification, I will reiterate it:

Sounds like you are making accusations against "some here", veiled though they may be. That's another specialty of Satan. Veiled accusations are the tool of those who either have no proof to substantiate their claims, or those who have not the courage to speak without subtlety. I exhort you, brother, to dispense with nefarious insinuations and, as a follower of Christ ought, state your case plainly.

Brad
 
Upvote 0

bradfordl

Veteran
Mar 20, 2006
1,510
181
✟25,108.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
The only reason I made the post was I felt for that poor soul who had only heard a part of the truth, accompanied by all the "amens" and "hallelujahs" in the cheering section.
By this statement I have to assume you are in a veiled and subtle manner addressing my post above. This again is an example of your preferred method of debate, by veiled accusation rather than honest and open rebuttal.

For the record, as much as it would please you if it were so, I have never denied or minimized the fact that God, to His great glory, accomplishes all His will in time. The redemption of His people is amazing, both corporately and individually, in every moment, and throughout all eternity. I have not emphasized anything over another. I have simply answered a simple question. That you desire to read into that answer so much wicked intent I propose is more a reflection of your own heart than anyone "here".
Talk is cheap.
I agree, or else you'd be bankrupt.

Since you have inferred that your post above has to do with mine (inferred because I see no courage to speak plainly), let's address the things contained therein that have nothing to do with the original question, which we must then assume are accusations:

1. It is to subtly suggest (not knowingly or intentionally, but by being deceived, or by remaining blindess or lack of light) that God's decree, in one part of it, is less glorious than another.

2. He didn't just talk about it, didn't just agree to it, didn't just decree it, though all of that, because He is God, made it certain that he would do it, No, He actually did it and is doing it now, in whomsoever He chooses.

3. And because they do so, those "elect" will produce fruit, good works, and not just the works of evangelism, but also of taking care of the poor, the blind and the widow and orphan, and the downtrodden and the oppressed and the poor. All of it are spoken of in the scripture, and all of it are Decreed and will be seen in the life of a true believer. He will "love the brethren" not with words only, but with his substance where he has it. These and many other fruits will be manifest in the life of a true believer. He may not do each of them, but His whole life will be changed and there will be fruit that can be seen, and it won't be a minor reformation and turning from gross sins only. No, the sins of the heart, the pride and the covetousness and lusts of the flesh, the appetites will also be hated and turned from.

4. Satan is a genius. If he can't get one to deny outright correct doctrine concerning foreknowledge, election, predestination, calling, justification, sanctification, and glorification, he will get one to emphasize one point over the other to the effect that while some aspects are spoken of with great supposed, and perhaps actual, reverence, other aspects are in effect denied, because they are belittled as being for example, done in time, as if God had not decreed this also, and as if they are not as important somehow as the original agreement.

5. Were there no time, there would be no creatures and no manhood of Christ to come and die for those creatures. These are just as glorious as God's choosing to elect some and not others.

6. Do not be confused by an apparent lack of emphasis by some here on what God's Word clearly emphasizes. For it is all a part of His Holy Word.

7. Christ himself, in His Gospels, warned again and again, and again, in parable after parable of those who would speak much and do little, who would be self deceived, and not "follow Him" and "obey His commandments". It is not enough to simply glorify His covenant in eternity past with words, though we should and must do that, for clearly, it is a most wonderful and glorious covenant, and we are right to point out that it all begins with Him, but it also ends With Him, for He is the Alpha, AND the Omega, not just the one or the other.

8. Talk is cheap. How grateful I am that Christ did more than talk about it, but that He did what He promised, in living out the commandments of the Law, and then dying for my sins, and in sending His Spirit to teach me of this great sacrifice, and to empower me, by grace alone, and with much weakness and remaining sinfulness, to follow Him, to obey Him, to "endure to the end" that I might be "saved". For He said "He that endures to the end will be saved".

9. Salvation, taken scripturally, deals with all of the above, not just one aspect of it.
So, in the interest of edification, would you kindly point out for me which of the above, by number, you are accusing me of committing or upholding or not upholding. Using the numbers may make it easier for you to communicate your accusations, since speaking plainly seems to be a problem for you.

Yes, I am slightly exhausted with your antics, which have included grossly (again) misrepresenting my positions then arguing against those misrepresentations, and usually done in some undercover manner. You shame our Lord with this sneaking around in the shadows.

I have not accused you of any sin, but I do now. I have only challenged points you have made in other threads, and refuted your misrepresentation of my statements. In response you have repeatedly hinted and insinuated many low things against me. I have no desire to jump on your personal bandwagon, but that is no reason to accuse me of whatever sin is your pet crusade. This is why I now challenge you to state your accusations plainly, in another thread if you wish. Then we can address your problems with me plainly and honestly.

Thank You,

Brad
 
Upvote 0

Iosias

Senior Contributor
Jul 18, 2004
8,171
227
✟9,648.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Well, not that I really care what any of those people believe, lol. But I don't disagree with you here. But that does not negate the fact that we do indeed have to actually believe and be born again, in time. You do believe that there are certain things the elect WILL do because they are elect, don't you? I am seriously asking, because I know that there are those who believe that if you are of the elect, it doesn't matter how you live or what you do. I am not one of those. I believe that if you are elect from the foundation of the world, you WILL repent and believe at some point in your life, and you will also produce fruit in keeping with repentence.

I have a feeling this is another argument about words, however, and so I will bow out. I am not young enough to care for those anymore, lol.

Holding to eternal justification does not imply antinomianism :)
 
Upvote 0

kimlva

Active Member
Nov 3, 2006
174
45
Virginia
✟23,035.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Holding to eternal justification does not imply antinomianism :)

Ummm...I am pretty sure I said I AGREE with you about eternal justification. So why are you accusing me of saying something I didn't?

Not trying to be snooty or anything, because I actually agree with you on so many points. But it is just really frustrating when it seems like people don't really read what is posted. Or maybe I am just horrible at making my points???
 
Upvote 0

Iosias

Senior Contributor
Jul 18, 2004
8,171
227
✟9,648.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Ummm...I am pretty sure I said I AGREE with you about eternal justification. So why are you accusing me of saying something I didn't?

I was greeing with you in answering your question

You do believe that there are certain things the elect WILL do because they are elect, don't you? I am seriously asking, because I know that there are those who believe that if you are of the elect, it doesn't matter how you live or what you do.
 
Upvote 0

Iosias

Senior Contributor
Jul 18, 2004
8,171
227
✟9,648.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Ok. Sorry. I can be quite dense at times. Be patient with me. :blush: :wave:

Though, I'm pretty sure I never would have figured it out if not for your second post of explanation.

No worries, the confusion no doubt stemmed from my post being too brief.:hug:
 
Upvote 0

orthedoxy

Lusavorchagan
Dec 15, 2003
533
17
pasadena california
✟764.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Salvation is an act of God, not an act of man. God is eternal, existing outside of time (since time itself is His creation), which is why the Word contains the portions quoted to you indicating the eternal nature of God's decree concerning the salvation of His own people. So from the perspective of the Author of salvation, it has been so from the foundation. Yes, from the perspective of us dim-sighted humans, there may be a point or period where an elect person becomes aware of the grace his Redeemer has bestowed upon him, purchased by the blood of the Son. From human perspective that might be thought of as the "time" we were saved, but the Lord included these scriptures for a reason. It must be that He wants us to comprehend to the best of our limited ability the eternal nature of His plan of redemption. Maybe because if we try to define Him by the finite limitations under which we exist, we tend to minimize the astounding greatness of His mercy, and conversely minimize the astounding putridity of our own sin.

So we can say what the Word says:

Brad
wouldn't make sense that God saves after knowing what you are going to do or how you lived your life?
He eternally have made the chice with foreknowledge from his view he is watching knowing the result just like we were watching a football game for the secound time knowing the results.
 
Upvote 0

bradfordl

Veteran
Mar 20, 2006
1,510
181
✟25,108.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Brad
wouldn't make sense that God saves after knowing what you are going to do or how you lived your life?
He eternally have made the chice with foreknowledge from his view he is watching knowing the result just like we were watching a football game for the secound time knowing the results.
Orth,
That would only make sense if you anthropomorphize God (ascribe to Him human characteristics and limitations). All of creation is God's work. Decreeing and carrying out the future is not possible for man, so it may be difficult to concieve of, but time itself is another characteristic of creation like heighth, width, depth, etc. and is therefore a created thing. How could the creator of a thing be restricted in any way by that thing? Logic dictates (or what makes sense is) that God exists outside of time. Scripture repeatedly bears this out, here's just one:

Isa 46:10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:
And the choice is not made by us, so what would he foresee?
Phi 2:13 For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.
The fact is that scripture makes all this very plain over and over again, and that people have trouble accepting it seems to have more to do with some idea that it would not be fair if God does not grant them autonomy of will. What they don't want to understand is that if they had that autonomy, they would all use it to reject Him and end up in hell. Thank God He doesn't!

So, instead of diminishing who He is to empower ourselves by inferring human limitations upon God, let's accept that he IS God and rules all things completely, and let's trust in His infallible wisdom to do it right.

Brad
 
Upvote 0

orthedoxy

Lusavorchagan
Dec 15, 2003
533
17
pasadena california
✟764.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Orth,
That would only make sense if you anthropomorphize God (ascribe to Him human characteristics and limitations). All of creation is God's work. Decreeing and carrying out the future is not possible for man, so it may be difficult to concieve of, but time itself is another characteristic of creation like heighth, width, depth, etc. and is therefore a created thing. How could the creator of a thing be restricted in any way by that thing? Logic dictates (or what makes sense is) that God exists outside of time. Scripture repeatedly bears this out, here's just one:

And the choice is not made by us, so what would he foresee?
The fact is that scripture makes all this very plain over and over again, and that people have trouble accepting it seems to have more to do with some idea that it would not be fair if God does not grant them autonomy of will. What they don't want to understand is that if they had that autonomy, they would all use it to reject Him and end up in hell. Thank God He doesn't!

So, instead of diminishing who He is to empower ourselves by inferring human limitations upon God, let's accept that he IS God and rules all things completely, and let's trust in His infallible wisdom to do it right.

Brad
phil 2:12 Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling; 13 for it is God who works in you both to will and to do for His good pleasure.
In this verse it says You work out your salvation. Have we worked it out yet? no therefore that hasn't happened yet but from his view since he knows he can choose according to his foreknowledge.
1 Peter 1:2
Who have been chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through the sanctifying work of the Spirit, for obedience to Jesus Christ and sprinkling by his blood: Grace and peace be yours in abundance.
We also read in Matt 25:31-end. When Jesus comes he will separate the sheep from the goats. He is separating basing on whether they fed the poor ETC... Did this happen yet? No therefore the only conclusion would be he knowingly chose us.
 
Upvote 0