e
quoted by Beanieboy:
The irony is that people claim that God offered a temptation (the Knowledge of Good and Evil), to offer man freewill. When you ask if there will be a Lucifer to tempt us in heaven, or if we are able to have free will to sin in heaven, they say no - so basically, you end up without freewill in the first place.
It is "fallen flesh" from which comes temptations, according to passages like Rom8; there is no sinful flesh in Heaven. Now, lucifer became conceited --- so arguably men have the same "free will"; yet --- given the example of how lucifer fell, the absence of weak sinful flesh, and full cognizance of our identity and position in Christ, I don't think there is a possibility of anyone getting "conceited" and thinking "I'll raise myself above God".
Quote:
And the "free will"? To either obey God or be tortured for eternity in hell.
That's not the paradigm; it's either "love God and be with Him,
or He doesn't have any other place to send you".
Quote:
That's like putting a gun to someone's head and giving them free will to give you their money.
Only if a person BELIEVES in the gun...
Quote:
Personally, I don't believe in the devil. I believe that if there were no man, there would be no evil. There wouldn't be giraffes killing neighboring giraffes in a giraffe gang. There wouldn't be kittens gone bad.
Whether you or I believe in him or not,
doesn't change whether or not he exists.
Quote:
Evil and good seem to live inside mankind, and whichever you feed becomes stronger. Unfortunately, it is beyond most people to admit that we have the ability, in the right situation, to kill someone with our bare hands, for example. So, instead, we put that bad image outside of us, call it satan, and even if we succumb to it, are still telling God "it wasn't me - it was the serpent! He told me to do it!"
We have a text called "The Bible". It makes clear assertions --- one of which is "satan is real". So if a person believes
"there is no devil", then he's thinking (by definition)
"the Bible is not true". And the Bible is true or not,
completely without consideration of whether we believe it or not.
This is why there is value in studying the Scripture, its archeological and genealogical assertions, to see "accuracy" or "error".
I've never seen error.
Quote:
I've told a story about a BornAgain friend of mine who saw her entire life as a chess game between God and satan. If she had to wait for a long red light, it was satan testing her patience. When it changed, it was an intervention of God. She (sees) every action and experience in her life as literally a blessing or a curse.
This denies two other influences; herself, and her peers.
Quote:
Conversely, Buddhism teaches that everything is a blessing. The bible even says to rejoice in all things. So, when it rains, I don't think Satan is raining on me personally, but thank the sky for watering the earth, and rejuvenating it. And no matter what happens, I try to give thanks.
It's a very different way to live.
On the other hand, reality is not
"man sitting before a table, on which is spread many different religions; man decides which one is best for him."
Reality is
man sitting before a table, on which is spread a vast array of beliefs, and man wonders "which one is TRUTH"?
As Christians, we believe that there is a great factory somewhere, within whose walls is a
production line, cranking out package after package of "counterfeit religions"; each designed to
lead people away from God.
What all the counterfeits have in common (different from Christianity), are two things:
1. Jesus is not God.
2. The path to God (or enlightenment, or oneness, or eternity, whatever) ---
is by good deeds.
Christianity asserts:
1. Jesus is God; no beginning, no end --- became man to pay for our sins.
2. The path to God
has nothing to do with works; it is a free gift, which changes the heart of he who receives it,
so that good works FOLLOW.
So it all boils down to a simple decision:
"Which one is truth?" More than one cannot be right ("all roads lead to God") --- because they all say different things. And Jesus said "I'm the ONLY way"; He was, or was not and knew it and was a LIAR, or was not and didn't know it and
was a lunatic. C.S.Lewis proposed the "Lord Liar Lunatic" argument. It is not credible to say "the Bible does not record events and Jesus' words accurately"; too much evidence that it is an accurate record.
So that's our decision --- the Bible is on the table with the rest of them,
and it has the credibility we seek. Jesus was God, is God, and the path TO God
is not by works.
It's not up to us to decide "which we like best"; but rather, "which is history"?