Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Like I said it just gets thrown out like the trash.Nothing has come across yet that would be valid that the change to Sunday was ever made of God, Jesus or any Prophet.
Don't come out shortchanged by the clever theology of men.
Like I said it just gets thrown out like the trash.
What ever you say.Well, there is One who will one day soon, reveal to all what the trash was.
I must take His Word as it clearly states and He wants me to hold Him to it!
This is talking about a period of time prior to the cross and New Covenant. Furthermore one is no longer a stranger if they join that covenant as Ex 12:48 states. This doesn't mean they're still not a son or daughter of the stranger who doesn't. One must join that covenant to participate in the Israeli religious rites. Its only those former gentiles that subject themselves to the law. It must be physical circumcision for the male as the Bible states. This isn't required of a female.What about these passages in Isaiah 56:1-2, 6-8 which speak of Sabbath, includes gentiles, and is yet unfulfilled being about the future of a time the Messiah comes.
It wasn't the Sabbath that was changed with the new covenant. What was changed was the fact it was founded on better promises and the blood of Jesus simply met all the ordinances, laws of sacrifices that pointed to the Real One that could take away sin.
The law of sacrifices was all that was removed and nailed to His Cross!
There is no such reference to be found in the Bible. BTW the above admits the law has changed.It wasn't the Sabbath that was changed with the new covenant. What was changed was the fact it was founded on better promises and the blood of Jesus simply met all the ordinances, laws of sacrifices that pointed to the Real One that could take away sin.
The law of sacrifices was all that was removed and nailed to His Cross!
There is no such reference to be found in the Bible. BTW the above admits the law has changed.
How so? Jeremiah says very clearly "Not according to.."It wasn't the Sabbath that was changed with the new covenant. What was changed was the fact it was founded on better promises and the blood of Jesus simply met all the ordinances, laws of sacrifices that pointed to the Real One that could take away sin.
The law of sacrifices was all that was removed and nailed to His Cross!
You're calling the Ten Commandments the Royal Law and James doesn't.No and no emphatically, the law of sacrifices was not the Royal law of which you will be judged!
The Royal law is as immutable as Yahweh Himself.
How so? Jeremiah says very clearly "Not according to.."
Hosea say the Sabbath will cease.
Seems you said the New Covenant is based on better promises and not the law. Did I read you wrong?
You're calling the Ten Commandments the Royal Law and James doesn't.
8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:
9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
11 For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law.
James changes the subject from Royal Law to the whole law in verse 10 and then references the Ten Commandments.
Would you mind explaining how the sacrifices were against us?Yes you sure did. You don't seem to catch that the new covenant don't change or remove the Royal law. The new covenant was about the laws of sacrifices, the type that pointed to the true one and only sacrifice that could take away sins.
These were the handwritten laws given by Moses, pertaining to the sacrifices that Pointe to Christ and His shed Blood! The laws of the sacrificial system.
Col 2:14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;
There were essential defects in these sacrifices. 1st.--They were not of the same nature with those who sinned. 2nd.--They were not of sufficient value to make satisfaction for the affronts done to the justice and government of God. 3rd.--The beasts offered up under the law could not consent to put themselves in the sinner's room and place. The atoning sacrifice must be one capable of consenting, and must voluntarily substitute himself in the sinner's stead: Christ did so.
Those sacrificial laws were of course met in Christ and done away with!
I'm really at a loss here. I just don't see James telling us to keep any law. James said "If".The whole law is exactly the same as the Royal law and the law of Liberty.
You are reading it in a bias as it is very clear James is speaking of the one only law given of God to Moses which is a copy of the ones in the Ark of His Testament in Heaven by the Throne, therefore, "The Royal Law!"
I'm really at a loss here. I just don't see James telling us to keep any law. James said "If".
Would you mind explaining how the sacrifices were against us?
What you're calling the Royal Law isn't part of the Ten Commandments. Surely you're not advocating keeping the whole law. James is speaking to Jews about what they're doing. James isn't telling us to keep the law.The whole law is exactly the same as the Royal law and the law of Liberty.
You are reading it in a bias as it is very clear James is speaking of the one only law given of God to Moses which is a copy of the ones in the Ark of His Testament in Heaven by the Throne, therefore, "The Royal Law!"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?