• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

fuzzymel

Contributor
Sep 25, 2006
5,020
595
Not a clue
✟30,527.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
I came across this on another childfree board I belong to. A couple are about to have a child and issued their family and friends with the following list to ensure that their wishes were obayed. Its become a bit of an internet hit. Now some things are totally understandable but others are selfish and some are just plain crazy:

First, rules for visiting:


Ok most of these I understand. Number 8 is just plain selfish. If they want someone to pick something up for them then why not ask before the person arrives? I am sure the visitor would be only happy to help out.

Handling the baby:



Hand lotion seems a little overkill but then so does telling people how to handle a child. If I can hold a child without dropping it then anyone can.

Here's where things get a little weird:

Rights and Responsibilities


Erm ok this is beginning to sound crazy. Number three is looking like the most sensible option.

Next

Specific Rules

Unless permitted by B AND K, do not:


Ok some of these again make sense. Number 11 is a little weird. If the child is overweight I don't think people could pick it up anyway.

Finally my personal fave list and the reason I think the childfree board noticed this demand:

Repercussions


erm what? Take pleasure in hurting those who break the rules?????

To be honest I really really hope these rules made up were a joke.
 

mina

Brown Eyed girl
Sep 26, 2003
37,260
4,047
in the South
✟130,521.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
wow, i hope they are a joke too. It's a good way to alienate everyone. I completely understand wanting people to respect your family and do the best by your child, but that just seems a a bit anal. And threatening violence against anyone that doesn't pass your code of standards? That's disgusting even as a joke. They sound like people who are offended by everything but don't care who they offend or hurt.
 
Upvote 0

Epoh99

Veteran
Oct 28, 2005
1,654
72
✟24,683.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If it is just a joke it looks like they spent a lot of time coming up with it. Also, if it is supposed to be a joke the way it's written I would say that deep down there's truth to it for these people.

I should come up with some childfree rules for people who come to visit me because I really don't want kids in my house...let me correct that, I don't want any of the kids I know in my house.
 
Upvote 0

127.0.0.1

They rally 'round the family
Feb 23, 2008
3,387
222
✟27,217.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
I don't think it's fake...I found that dad's blogsite. He actually made a blog all about his wife's pregnancy and their expectancy.

immabeadad

And then a reposting of the rules can be found here

I'd tell the they could go F themselves and that'd be that.

How do you think they got pregnant?

lol! yeah right on!
 
Upvote 0

HeyHomie

Senior Veteran
Jul 8, 2005
3,015
236
55
Springfield, IL
✟4,386.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Wow. Just, wow.

It has "Internet Joke" written all over it, but the evidence seems to suggest it's real. That's just... wrong.

The funny thing is, I think a lot of their requests are reasonable, but I wouldn't dream of codifying them, especially in such a formal and business-like manner. I'd say something more like:

A and L appreciate your interest in our new arrival. We hope that little Philbert brings as much joy to you as he will to us. We ask that you please consider the fact that, as new parents, we are likely to be worn out, and ask that you plan accordingly.

And by the way, the bit about the hand lotion is WAY off. I read that one of the reasons kids these days are turning up with such deathly allergies is the fact that our world is so antiseptic that they're not getting the early childhood exposure to germs and allergens that they need to build up immunity.
 
Upvote 0

snoochface

Meet the new boss -- same as the old boss.
Jan 3, 2005
14,128
2,965
59
San Marcos, CA
✟193,383.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Is spawn a word we are allowed to use here?

I'm sure someone will "accidentally" fall into this forum and rip me a new one for it. And truthfully, the word isn't fair to the poor child who had no say in being born to those people. I just know that if I had to deal with them in any way, that's probably how I'd feel about them and their child.


That's exactly right. Plus, I wouldn't want someone's hands slicked up with smelly, greasy lotion before holding my newborn.
 
Upvote 0

Mskedi

Senior Veteran
Dec 13, 2005
4,165
518
47
✟29,300.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Green
Yeah... I wouldn't be visiting them.

I always offer to pick up things for friends of mine that have just had a kid... it's just a nice thing to do. But if they expected or demanded it, it would be my last visit until the kid could go to the store himself.
 
Upvote 0
Oct 29, 2006
2,361
193
✟25,867.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
yeah, whoever said 'obsessive' was spot on. To actually go to the trouble of drawing up a list of rules?? Obviously their first child! Watch him have a heart attack the first time his kid eats a fistfull of dirt - or will the child not be allowed outside until the world is sterilized???
lol, some of the rules are fine, but like heyhomie said, codifying them is a bit nuts...
 
Upvote 0

Caffeinated

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2008
859
190
✟24,447.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private



These people have no class. Many of their 'rules' have nothing to do with the baby's well-being anyway - no complaining in their house? Hope they're okay with the massive amounts of complaining that will take place outisde their house with the departure of each visitor.
 
Upvote 0

Rembrandtfan

He's here, the Phantom of the Opera
Jul 18, 2007
1,200
205
La La Land
✟24,778.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It may be an internet joke, but I believe there could be a nugget of truth to it in some cases. It sounds like some people I knew from church. Some of us would take meals to couples with newborns and it almost started to seem like it was becoming expected after a while. I even had someone tell me that she was sent a thank you card that said "thank you for not bringing chicken". And someone actually sent me a thank you card that said "thank you for bringing healthy food to help me stick to my diet" I'm like Hello!? I'm not Jenny Craig. I had heard there were couples complaining about what was being brought to them. I'm thinking, "Get over it. If you don't like it, give it away to someone else. No one is obligated to bring you anything." My husband even thought it started getting ridiculous, and he has children.

I can understand some of it, but I think it should have been phrased as requests instead of rules. A person has a right to set reasonable boundaries in their own home, but some of it goes to extremes. And "punishment" for breaking the rules? Well B-O-O-H-O-O!
 
Upvote 0

Rembrandtfan

He's here, the Phantom of the Opera
Jul 18, 2007
1,200
205
La La Land
✟24,778.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
1


Could some of this be directed at in-laws who try to interfere? Some of it kind of makes sense in that context, i.e. taking the child to a religious event w/o permission, or trying to convince one spouse to keep a violation from another?
 
Upvote 0

127.0.0.1

They rally 'round the family
Feb 23, 2008
3,387
222
✟27,217.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Could some of this be directed at in-laws who try to interfere? Some of it kind of makes sense in that context, i.e. taking the child to a religious event w/o permission, or trying to convince one spouse to keep a violation from another?

3. Touch or pick up the baby.
Oh yes, that one's got in-laws and everyone else written all over it.

GRRRRR no, back off, my baby!

I'm the total opposite. I can't accept involvement in any child's life. The kid could be my nephew and I'd still totally disown him as an uncle.

You know what'd be funny is to go up and put your hand on the baby & see if mommy bites you! Maybe you'll get lucky and she'll give you a warning growl first.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0