concretecamper
Member of His Church
- Nov 23, 2013
- 6,742
- 2,553
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
read @Strong in Him post 155. Pretty much agrees with my response to you.Oh my goodness, you got me!! "Bible" vs. "Scripture". Good argument... Make up your mind, Rome
of course it is. But that is not the discussion we are having. The discussion is what was Paul referring to in the letter to Timothy.Is the "Bible" "Scripture" or is it not?
What does this have to do with my question to you?If it's Scripture, then the implication of it being inspired is stronger than many of the arguments from silence Rome makes up for their tradition.
your words, not mine.So, Rome "canonizes" the "Bible"
Because the Bible never claims to be the "Standard". If want to hold your interpretation of the Bible as the "Standard", go ahead. Just realize you are following a man made idea.and criticizes everyone else when they want to see the "Bible" as the "standard" above Roman tradition.
you are making things up. No one ever suggested that the NT writing are God inspired.And now Rome's adherents want to suggest the NT Writings are not God inspired
Jesus promised us a Church. Jesus never promised us a book. I'll follow Jesus, you follow man.and in effect make Roman tradition the standard
if that made any sense, I would offer a response.Rome is both the canonizer and the canon. We outside have known this. Nothing new.
Last edited:
Upvote
0