Romans 1:26-27 - Vile Affections

[HuntingMan]

I don't see how its apples and oranges... both are considered "unBiblical". S why is one countenanced ant not the other.

then you dont understand the issue of MDR...which ISNT the topic here...
*IF* you want to discuss that issue see my thread here...
http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=7307151

 

[EnemyPartyII]

I don't think I'm talking about MDR (whatever that is) I'm asking for an explanation of the double standard

 

[HuntingMan]

I don't think I'm talking about MDR (whatever that is) I'm asking for an explanation of the double standard

If you cant take this to the thread I started on the topic Im going to put you on ignore.

 

[EnemyPartyII]

If you cant take this to the thread I started on the topic Im going to put you on ignore.

I'm not debating anything! I asked a question?!

What IS MDR anyway?

 

[HuntingMan]

I'm not debating anything! I asked a question?!

What IS MDR anyway?

off topic...see here.
http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=7307151

 

[OllieFranz]

I believe that MDR is the way HuntingMan refers to the issue of Marriage->Divorce->Remarriage. And please go to his other thread before he has a heart attack because you are messing up his neat little "vile affections" thread with questions about remarriage. (Of course, on that thread he'll just complain about you mentioning homosexuality. I wonder if his philosophy is so compartmentalized that he can't see that people have questions about his different -- one might almost say contradictory -- treatment of the two subjects.)

 

[CaDan]

Tho youre wasting your time if you plan on presenting material from philosophers, Ollie.
And I hardly think Paul 'borrowed' his INSPIRED message from any philosopher

I do.

So do the majority of New Testament text critics.

But please, continue.

By the way, have you followed through on God's command to kill any gay folks you might meet lately?

 

[CaDan]

If you cant take this to the thread I started on the topic Im going to put you on ignore.

Ooooh . . . . We is scared now!

 

[HuntingMan]

I do.

So do the majority of New Testament text critics.

oh please....modern critics and ones trying to do away with biblical precepts, no doubt.

But please, continue.

By the way, have you followed through on God's command to kill any gay folks you might meet lately?

By the way have you figured out that Im not under the right covenant to kill gays

 

[CaDan]

oh please....modern critics and ones trying to do away with biblical precepts, no doubt.

Or ones simply trying to read the text and understand it without cultural preconditions as much as possible.

By the way have you figured out that Im not under the right covenant to kill gays

You sure?

God has taught me to call no man unclean. That's St. Peter. How about you? You up for taking St. Peter seriously?

 

[HuntingMan]

Or ones simply trying to read the text and understand it without cultural preconditions as much as possible.

or ones trying to remove the true intent of Gods word....

You sure?

apparently you arent.

God has taught me to call no man unclean. That's St. Peter. How about you? You up for taking St. Peter seriously?

Youre as bad as others here about ripping things out of context.
Peters vision was about the gentiles...peter seemed to be a bit of a racist of sorts and didnt seem to want to believe that the gentiles had been brought in and were equal to Jews. That has nothing to do with knowing and acknowledging sin, poster.

(Act 10:34 KJV) Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.

homosexuals engaged in sexual deviance are not working righteousness according to scripture but that which is dishonorable...

 

[EnemyPartyII]

Youre as bad as others here about ripping things out of context.

*kchht* Black kettle this is pot, over*

 

[HuntingMan]

*kchht* Black kettle this is pot, over*

 

[davedjy]

or ones trying to remove the true intent of Gods word....

Taking a passage out of context isn't fighting for God's Word in the least...

 

[HuntingMan]

Taking a passage out of context isn't fighting for God's Word in the least...

Nice try chap.
Stealing is stealing REGARDLESS of the context it is presented in

 

[Stinker]

HuntingMan, Is it your understanding that the condition of the transgendered, transexual, hermaphrodite, and homosexual, are a nature?

 

[HuntingMan]

HuntingMan, Is it your understanding that the condition of the transgendered, transexual, hermaphrodite, and homosexual, are a nature?

For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
(Rom 1:26-27 KJV)

What is natural is for a man to desire a woman.
men desiring men is AGAINST what is natural....

 

[Stinker]

What is natural is for a man to desire a woman.
men desiring men is AGAINST what is natural....

HuntingMan, Do you believe that it is natural for women to have difficulty parallel parking their automobiles, and that it is unnatural for men to have difficulty parallel parking their automobiles?

 

[HuntingMan]

HuntingMan, Do you believe that it is natural for women to have difficulty parallel parking their automobiles, and that it is unnatural for men to have difficulty parallel parking their automobiles?

When you return from the brink of absurdity, give me a ring...

 

[ryanb6]

HuntingMan, Do you believe that it is natural for women to have difficulty parallel parking their automobiles, and that it is unnatural for men to have difficulty parallel parking their automobiles?

horrible analogy