Unless. . .since my interpretation fits Rev 20, then yours is in error, and the rebellion of 2 Th 2:3 is yours. . .not to mention the convenient and pathetic notion that those who disagree with you are in "rebellion."
You do not agree that those who take the position - my interpretation is as good as your interpretation, fit 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12?
The scriptures are there for all to read. Paul spoke of this occurring after the apostles were gone.
Also, it is noted by historians that this proliferated as time went by.
By the 17th century, the contemporary word "denomination" began to be used to describe religious offshoots, Michelle Sanchez, an associate professor of theology at Harvard Divinity School, told Live Science via email.
Protestants had used scripture to critique the Roman Catholic Church, claiming that any believer could read scripture and have a personal relationship with God. But then, "the obvious problem emerged: Whose interpretation of scripture was the right one?" Sanchez said in an interview. As believers debated the scriptures and sacraments, churches formed and split based on myriad biblical interpretations, ways of worship and organizational structures. From these debates, denominations such as the Presbyterians, Mennonites, Baptists and Quakers, among others, took root.
I did not author this. It's available on the internet free.
You are the one claiming that if anyone disagrees with me they are in 'rebellion'.
I never said that.
More of that convenient interpretation which nullifies and anathematizes all not in agreement with it.
Precisely. . .addressed in post #43.
Satan is very active, but he is still partially bound in that he is not able to use the nations to conquer the church, which he will pursue when he is fully loosed.
You don't see how you are contradicting the scripture?
No scripture says Satan is partially bound. Therefore, that is an addition, in order to support your view.
Revelation 22:18 ...If anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book...
You understand that, don't you.
The scripture actually says,
1 Then
I saw an angel coming down from heaven, having the key to the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.
2 He laid hold of the dragon, that serpent of old, who is the Devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years;
3 and he cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal on him, so that he should deceive the nations no more till the thousand years were finished. But after these things he must be released for a little while. Revelation 20:1-3
The lid of the abyss is not partially opened also, is it? Did the angel partially seal it over him?
You used a word earlier - pathetic.
Do you know how Christ views those who do not want to accept the truth he presents?
Revelation 22:18, 19
18 For I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book;
19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God[ shall take away his part from the Book of Life, from the holy city, and
from the things which are written in this book.
How Jesus views us is more important than how a human views us, wouldn't you agree.
If we hate the truth, and indicate we do, by insisting on believing a lie - what we want to believe, for what ever reason, 2 Thessalonians 2:12 tells us in no uncertain terms, we are condemned.
These are not my words. Nothing here is my interpretation.
Everything I said is scripture.
You, on the other hand have added words like "partially", "enough", and other words, which change what is written in scripture, and
invalidates it. Matthew 15:9
So, if you are annoyed Clare, get used to it. Or adjust.