Find some scientific evidence for God, and the scientific community will "accept" God just fine. Don't get mad at science for asking for evidence you can't provide.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Find some scientific evidence for God, and the scientific community will "accept" God just fine. Don't get mad at science for asking for evidence you can't provide.Rather lame excuses there, Cadet.
It is quite clear that the scientific community CHOOSES naturalism and DISMISSES God, and not at all because of the evidence.
For the n-th time, it's about history, the history of the universe and life coming into existence.Find some scientific evidence for God,
No, they admit they will not.and the scientific community will "accept" God just fine.
You didn;t read the quotes then, otherwise you wouldn't say what you just said.Don't get mad at science for asking for evidence you can't provide.
For the n-th time, it's about history, the history of the universe and life coming into existence.No, they admit they will not.
Are you sure you read the OP?
You didn;t read the quotes then, otherwise you wouldn't say what you just said.
They are not my quotes, it says in small font whose quotes they are.Your quotes have no value:
Your acting as if they don't mean what they say is not even convincing to yourself.Deuteronomy 32 39 "there is no God"
They are not my quotes, it says in small font whose quotes they are.Your acting as if they don't mean what they say is not even convincing to yourself.
It's pathetic how you folks take what your prophets have said out on me.
..but i guess you have no choice..
because there's no evidence of God. Science deals in evidence. If you want science to talk about God, find some evidence first. Then we (science literate types) will talk about him in a scientific context all you likeFor the n-th time, it's about history, the history of the universe and life coming into existence.No, they admit they will not.
I read enough of them to see the thread title was misleading, and there was plenty of out of context quote mining.Are you sure you read the OP?
You didn;t read the quotes then, otherwise you wouldn't say what you just said.
2nd Corinthians "I was stoned".Please, there is a commandment against doing what you are currently doing. You posted those out of context quotes, so you are responsible for them.
But those quotes are worthless since they are out of context. Once again, from the book of 1 Kings:
"there is no God"
That is twice now that the Bible has said there is no God. According to your standards it must be correct.
Is that all you have? I have at least ten more, all of then much more damaging to your case than your out of context quotes are to reality.
Isn't it?They are revered by the flock.
As i said, the quotes are genuine.
If you have a problem with the content, take it up with them.
Ar you suggesting truth is decided up on by the most popular opinion??Which is as much an argument against democracy as anything.
(But we're rather stuck with that as everything else seems worse still.)
Nope, it violates the laws of matter and energy.That seems about right:
This "quantum cosmology" provides a loophole for the universe to, so to speak, spring into existence from nothing, without violating any laws of physics. (Paul Davies)
In order create itself, it would have to exist prior to its existence.The universe can spontaneously create itself out of nothing.
(Steven Hawking)
Exactly.Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.
(R Dawkins, "the Blind Watchmaker") (my emphasis)
Without a valid reason.Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed but rather evolved.
(Francis Crick "what mad pursuit")
Not when you actually think.First two: spontaneous existence is quite thinkable.
Even less it means "not designed".Second two: *apparent* design does not does not have to mean "designed" at all.
So you know more than Davies and Hawking, do you?Nope, it violates the laws of matter and energy.
In order create itself, it would have to exist prior to its existence.
You say that because you believe in evolution.
and now you're hurt because your prophets admit to their dishonesty.
So you think they meant something else?This is just twice in the thread, aside from the actual OP, where you have lied, Hieronymous.
Since you like quotes so much, here's one for you, from Proverbs 6:16-19:
"There are six things that the LORD strongly dislikes, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers."
You think they don't know?So you know more than Davies and Hawking, do you?
So you think they meant something else?
Not very likely, is it?
How many times do i have to explain to you lot that the scientific method does not apply to the questions about the origins?Then you should understand that we're not talking about philosophical naturalism when we talk about science.
That's a lie.You are lying.
That's a lie.
You are desperate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?