Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Of course.Do you understand the difference between philosophical naturalism and methodological naturalism?
No.These quotes are either not that revealing, saying reasonable things that you've clearly taken to mean something else, or quite possibly just taken out of context.
You ignored the second part of my post over whether you had read the original sources, which is ironic considering I was saying it's important for an open and honest discussion... So have you read them?
I think you fail to grasp what is at hand here.For me, I always find it entertaining, to see how folks who deny well evidenced reality, try to support their position.
No, i just disagree with all of it.You ignored the second part of my post
Do you understand you appear very irrational right now?No, i just disagree with all of it.
No.Do you understand you appear very irrational right now?
Are you a teenager? Or a child? I'm not sure how an adult can act like this.
Sorry folks, but you all have nothing but lame excuses to dismiss what the prophets of the church of naturalism have admitted in public.
You're defending what they have you believe, while they confess their dishonesty.
Take it up with them, not with me.
I am a Christian and am just trying to help a brother out. You should really read the original sources of quotes you find to ensure they are in context and mean what you say they mean. Random internet websites can have all sorts of biases and really shouldn't be trusted.All quotes in the OP are genuine and speak for themselves.
Have fun imagining a context in which it means something other than what it says.
Obviously i post this on a CHRISTIAN FORUM for some perspective on the naturalistic gospel of our origins.
It is not based on evidence, it is decided a priori.
So much for man's endeavour to seek truth by means of gathering and analysing evidence.
Bye.
Did you even read the quotes?Was this supposed to be yet another thread that's supposed to destroy evolution through a few quotes rather than science?
Rather good actually.So...how's that working out?
With what?I am a Christian and am just trying to help a brother out.
What are you suggesting here?You should really read the original sources of quotes you find to ensure they are in context and mean what you say they mean.
As i said, the quotes are genuine.Random internet websites can have all sorts of biases and really shouldn't be trusted.
Did you even read the quotes?
The naturalist prophets admit their biasses and their refusal to consider anything else regardless of the evidence.
I can understand evolutionists have a problem with that, but they'll have to take it up with them.
Rather good actually.
Predictable, but good.
Sorry folks, but you all have nothing but lame excuses to dismiss what the prophets of the church of naturalism have admitted in public.
You're defending what they have you believe, while they confess their dishonesty.
Take it up with them, not with me.
Incorrect labels. Theistic evoution is never labeled " naturalistic." Where did you get the idea? I and other theologians do not think of terms such as natural vs. supernatural, we think of God as supra-natural, the chief exemplification of all metaphysical principles, not their negation, as per supernaturalism.So you see, joshua there are more options than naturalistic or theistic evolution.
Isn't it?They are revered by the flock.
Why do the natural sciences work?Laws of physics my friend.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?