• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Results and Discussion of the 'Weaponization of the Federal Government Subcommittee' -- Is there any there there?

Hans Blaster

One nation indivisible
Mar 11, 2017
20,841
15,756
55
USA
✟397,247.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
There were hearings...

last July featuring RFK Jr.
November
and February

and a week ago:

March 7th

Jordan Peterson talks about CCTV surveillance in China. Fascinating stuff. But this is not exactly the weaponized DOJ we were promised.
A Canadian (former) psychology professor talking about the Chinese government surveillance of the Chinese people? Sounds on topic. Talk about the wrong person discussing the wrong topic. Someone should notify Congress's "mods" and get the thread shut down.
Anyone see anything worth talking about in any of this?
Nope.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
40,933
43,999
Los Angeles Area
✟983,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Representative Jasmine Crockett took on former top Trump administration official Gene Hamilton during Wednesday's Republican led House Hearing on the Weaponization of the Federal Government. In a fiery confrontation, Rep. Crockett exposed Hamilton's work on the controversial and extreme policy proposals detailed in the Project 2025.

I don't care for her manner, but Rep. Crockett does a great job pointing out how several aspects of 'Project 2025' pose real risks to weaponizing government, and Trump is currently facing the consequences of his actions fair and square.

Three and a half minutes.

 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
40,933
43,999
Los Angeles Area
✟983,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

Jim Jordan subpoenas company where Trump judge’s daughter works

The subpoena escalates a brewing battle between the panel’s Subcommittee on Weaponization of the Federal Government and the company, Authentic Campaigns, which previously rebuffed lawmakers’ demands to turn over any communications the company had with Merchan, noting they simply don’t exist.

The letter from Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) asks CEO Mike Nellis to sit for a deposition with the company and sign a sworn affidavit that the company never communicated with Merchan.

Nellis had previously mocked Jordan, calling it absurd to suggest that his company would have any dealings with an employee’s parent

“Let us be clear: these allegations against our company are completely false and purely politically motivated."

The weaponization is coming from inside the subcommittee!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
40,933
43,999
Los Angeles Area
✟983,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Looks like the only activity since May (2 posts ago) was a hearing in July about the NY state trial (which would not appear to be the Federal Government). Lawyers on both sides provided opinions: 'Trump was railroaded' v. 'a model of proper prosecution'.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
40,933
43,999
Los Angeles Area
✟983,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Old and busted: Weaponization of the Justice Department
New Hotness: Judicial Overreach

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), who has promised to go after what he has characterized as “activist judges” who are blocking President Donald Trump’s agenda, will hold a hearing at 10 a.m. Eastern time Tuesday titled “Judicial Overreach and Constitutional Limits on the Federal Courts.”

I guess the problem was never about the prosecutions and lawsuits, it was about the verdicts and judgments. If the judges had let all the J6 hostages go, Trump wouldn't have had to pardon them.
 
Upvote 0

Godsunworthyservant

Active Member
Dec 10, 2023
274
141
69
WV
✟14,065.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
This was supposed to be one of the GOP's signature issues after taking control of the House. Jim Jordan has been figuratively waving a piece of paper with the names of numerous whistleblowers who were going to blow the lid off the issue, but so far the testimony has sounded like disgruntled employees. And Jordan has not produced much information about any other whistleblowers. No one on this side of CF has really posted about it, and one post on the Christian-only side has not gotten any activity. Though it's early days yet -- committees take their time.

So here's a thread to talk about the testimony and reports from this particular Subcommittee. <--- this is the topic of this thread, not what you heard from Aunt Edna, not what some guy on TV said. Results from this Subcommittee and discussion thereof.

In his quest to prove the federal government has been “weaponized” against conservatives, Republican House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan has touted the allegations of what he claims are “dozens” of whistleblowers who have come to his office with stories of discrimination and bias.

Three of Jordan’s witnesses have come in for private interviews with committee staff so far. None of them appear to have had their claims validated by government entities that grant federal whistleblower protection, sources familiar with their testimony said. One who alleged there was FBI wrongdoing had their claims rejected. Another is retired and it’s unclear whether he has first-hand knowledge of the violations he alleges. The third has not revealed his direct disclosures or FBI suspension notice to House Democrats, according to transcripts reviewed by CNN.

The three so far interviewed:

One of them is Steve Friend, a former FBI agent working out of Florida who was suspended in August 2022 for objecting to using a SWAT team to arrest a subject for what Friend described as “misdemeanor offenses.”

Friend, who was interviewed by Republican and Democratic subcommittee staff earlier this month, was not part of the SWAT team but was asked to help with the case and refused, he told CNN in an interview.

The men arrested on the date Friend listed in his disclosures were members of a Florida-based organization known as the “Guardians of Freedom,” which adheres to the ideology of the “Three Percenters” and were illegally at the Capitol on January 6, according to the FBI.

Friend admitted in the subcommittee interview that owning a gun or being accused of a felony crime were reasons for FBI management to consider using a SWAT team, according to transcripts reviewed by CNN.

[Guy doesn't do his job; guy gets suspended. Is that 'retaliation' or the fruits of not doing your job?]

--

Judiciary committee staff have also interviewed a former FBI analyst who retired in October 2021 named George Hill, who supervised intelligence analysts that provided support to less than a dozen cases related to January 6.

In his interview with the subcommittee Hill criticized a bank that he says shared with the FBI records of people who were in DC on January 6, according to transcripts reviewed by CNN.

As part of its investigation into the January 6 attack at the Capitol, the FBI collected financial, communications and other business records of people investigated for possible crimes related to the Capitol riot. It’s a routine investigative tool used to help investigators and prosecutors gather evidence. Bank transactions could be used to show travel and location of suspected rioters, and could be used to establish the purchase of weapons used in the attacks on police protecting the Capitol.

[Guy sees routine things he doesn't like; guy retires. ?]

--

The third whistleblower interviewed by the subcommittee is suspended FBI agent Garret O’Boyle, who says he was suspended for making an unauthorized media disclosure. During his interview with subcommittee staff, O’Boyle, who worked out of the FBI’s Wichita field office, would not elaborate on the claim or provide his suspension notice.

[His lawyer said] "He did not release that information to Democrats on the committee because he knew that they would leak it to the media.”

[?]
And don't forget, Trump tried to fire the head of the federal agency dedicated to protecting whistleblowers. (Just saying) All this discussion reminds me why the only thing Christ ever said concerning political matters was "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's". During Christ's time on this Earth, there was much to be dissatisfied with in the political arena, as the nation of Israel was under Roman rule which included "taxation without representation" among many other problems. Yet Christ never spoke about becoming involved with political opposition. When He was asked about the taxes, this was His reply and He never again spoke about politics.
 
Upvote 0