• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Restore Wine to the Table

Koey

Veteran
Apr 25, 2004
1,059
70
Australia
Visit site
✟24,141.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The Churches of Christ claims to be a restoration movement. Yet not when it comes to wine at the Lord's Supper. Why?

Almost every Bible commentary and almost every theologian agrees that the terms for "wine" in the original languages refer to fermented that is alcoholic grape juice. There is no indication otherwise, except for those who wish to read their prejudice into the Bible.

Until pasteurization and refrigeration, there was no method of preserving grape juice other than allowing it to ferment. Certainly, alcoholism was a problem in ancient times and the Bible contains a number of warnings against excessive drinking.

The Word Temperance

In Galatians 5:23 the word temperance does not mean a methyphobia (fear of alcohol). A modern translation of the Bible will use the word self-control in Galatians 5, because that's what the original Greek meant, self-control not abstinence.

Wine or Grape Juice

Some people believe that the wine described in the Bible was unfermented grape juice. But this is a misunderstanding of history and science. Until pasteurization and refrigeration, fresh squeezed grape juice always fermented within a very few days.

Jesus’ First Miracle

Jesus’ first recorded miracle was at a wedding in Cana (John 2), where he turned water into wine.

"A feast is made for laughter, and wine makes merry" (Ecclesiastes 10:19). The wedding at Cana in Galilee, where Jesus turned water into wine, was a feast. There is absolutely no logical reason, no indication in Scripture or historical context demonstrating that this was grape juice.

The Last Supper

Jesus passed around a cup of wine to His disciples. It is not logical to claim that this was merely grape juice. Passover is in the northern hemisphere's Spring, six months after the grape harvest. There was no refrigeration and pasteurization had not yet been invented. This had to be fermented wine.

The expression "fruit of the vine," was "employed by the Jews from time immemorial for the wine partaken of on sacred occasions, as at the Passover and on the evening of the Sabbath” (The New Westminster Dictionary of the Bible).

A Blessing in Measure

The real reason that some ban alcohol for all Christians today is not the result of good theology, a thorough study of ancient history or even linguistic analysis of biblical Greek and Hebrew. It first arose around 1830 during the temperance movement in Britain, which at first encouraged abstinence from distilled spirits but not beer.

If used moderately, alcohol was designed by God to be a blessing in the body of a normally healthy person. It cheers God and men (Judges 9:13), gladdens the heart (Psalms 104:15), gladdens life (Exodus 10:19), makes the heart exult (Zechariah 10:7), cheers up those who are depressed (Proverbs 31:6). Wine is to be imbibed with a cheerful heart (Ecclesiastes 9:7). It makes life merry (Ecclesiastes 10:19).

A Curse if Abused

Yet, like most things in life, alcohol can be abused. The Bible does not condemn moderate consumption of alcohol, but does strongly warn against drunkenness (Proverbs 20:1). Those who linger too long or keep mixing their drinks are promised woe (Proverbs 23:29-32), as are those who drink all day and night (Isaiah 5:11).

Sometimes it may be good to avoid eating certain foods or drinking alcohol when it may cause someone to stumble (Romans 14:21). We could apply this principle to friends who may be alcoholics, teetotalers, overeaters, vegetarians or are on a diet. Some apply this only to alcohol and not to foods, and so avoid drinking alcohol at all or in public, which is inconsistent because the verse also speaks about foods. The choice is yours.

The writer to the Romans is not making a religious rule about alcohol or even food, but teaching the importance of not offending. Yet at times Jesus purposely offended the Pharisees to wake them up. Curiously enough, usually those who are most offended by Christians drinking are other Christians. We all have the tendency to create lists of rules that are not Christian essentials. That was also a problem with a sect 2,000 years ago called Pharisees. Instead, we need to focus on the nuts and bolts of Christianity.

May Leaders Drink?

What about church leaders? Doesn't 1 Timothy 3:3; 5:23 say that an elder should not be a drunkard? Yes, it does. It does not say he must be a teetotaler. By implication then this "allows moderate use of alcoholic beverages" for church leaders (Walter L. Liefeld, NIV Application Commentary, 1999, Zondervan, p. 120). Paul confirms this by encouraging Timothy to take "a little wine" (1 Timothy 5:23). Some church leaders have had the odd occasion when they were relaxing at home only to be called away on a crisis where they needed a clear head. As a result of similar experiences, some church leaders are careful not to drink much if any alcohol when on call. That is a personal choice made in wisdom and not a legalistic rule.

Honesty Check

Teetotalers must be honest in admitting that there is no direct Scriptural statement banning moderate consumption of alcohol and that taken collectively, the Scriptures allow either total abstinence from alcohol or moderation. Teetotalers must also admit that the Passover wine Jesus took at his Last Supper could not have been grape juice, because it was 6 months after the grape harvest, and there was neither refrigeration nor pasteurization.

Moderate drinkers must admit that their freedom can at times be a stumbling block to the weak and that because there is no clear line between moderation and excess, they ought to avoid even the appearance of overindulgence. Drunkards must admit that the Scriptures clearly define drunkenness as wrong (Romans 13:13; Galatians 5:21) and that no drunkard will inherit the kingdom of heaven (1 Corinthians 6:10).

Conclusion

Jesus came to do away with a religion of touch not, taste not. There is no biblical ground for bigotry against Christians who drink moderately. Jesus miraculously made wine for a wedding, drank wine at the Last Supper and died at the hands of people who loved Pharisaic lists of religious rules. Let's do away with our Christianized Talmud of do's and don'ts and make our rules the ones that Jesus plainly taught.

It is a non-essential whether Christians drink alcohol in moderation or are teetotalers. That is a matter of personal choice. Either way it does not make someone a better or worse Christian than another. The only essentials here are that Christians avoid the sin of drunkenness and use wisdom if they do choose to drink a little alcohol.

Finally, we must admit that we cannot claim to be a restoration movement, when we refuse to restore wine to the Lord's table.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pdudgeon

Frame1520

Senior Member
Dec 29, 2005
552
29
44
Cincinnati
Visit site
✟23,354.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Hi Koey,
I appreciate your thoughts on this. One question I have is, what good does this do for the recovering alcoholic, or someone who is prone to alcohol abuse? I cannot remember the verse, but it has something to do with not setting up your brother to sin. I'm not arguing for or against, I just wanted to pose this question.

Thanks!
 
Upvote 0

AJB4

Senior Veteran
Sep 21, 2006
2,990
92
New Zealand
✟26,180.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Exactly. Also, what good does it do to young Christians who are still too young to consume any alcohol? Not to mention recovering alcoholics. The slightest taste of wine by a dried-out alcoholic might make them jump into that lifestyle again. My Dad is a dried-out alcoholic and hasn't had a drink since before I was born. It wouldn't be legal, if you gave alcoholic wine to the young, underage Christians.

The negatives outweigh the positives. Grape juice is still wine, just unfermented, so it's still wine. I say leave things as they are.
 
Upvote 0

Koey

Veteran
Apr 25, 2004
1,059
70
Australia
Visit site
✟24,141.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Hi Koey,
I appreciate your thoughts on this. One question I have is, what good does this do for the recovering alcoholic, or someone who is prone to alcohol abuse? I cannot remember the verse, but it has something to do with not setting up your brother to sin. I'm not arguing for or against, I just wanted to pose this question.

Thanks!
Why is it that we claim to be a restoration movement, but find excuses not to restore things? Jesus had alcoholics in his day too, but drank wine at the last supper, not grape juice. Was he wrong too?

Romans 14:21 is often used as an excuse to avoid alcohol, but I notice that nobody avoids foods. Why? Because the temperance movement has hoodwinked us that alcohol is a problem but food not. This is not good reasoning. It also does nothing about Paul who even advised Timothy to drink "a little" wine, nor Christ who was not a teetotaller and did not see the need to avoid it. To make such a conclusion makes Paul contradict Jesus.

The idea that avoiding alcohol helps alcoholics also has its critics. Some say that a good example of moderation helps them just as much. But neither argument is a biblical one, but a social argument, outside the Bible. I'm interested in the Bible. Sorry, but I follow Jesus and his example, not legalism.

If my brother is weak in the faith and prefers grape juice, that is okay, but let's not impose our lack of faith on others. Some churches offer both, so that the individual may choose according to their faith. That would be my preference too. Then you and I could meet in harmony, me taking my wine and you your grape juice for communion.
 
Upvote 0

Koey

Veteran
Apr 25, 2004
1,059
70
Australia
Visit site
✟24,141.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Exactly. Also, what good does it do to young Christians who are still too young to consume any alcohol? Not to mention recovering alcoholics. The slightest taste of wine by a dried-out alcoholic might make them jump into that lifestyle again. My Dad is a dried-out alcoholic and hasn't had a drink since before I was born. It wouldn't be legal, if you gave alcoholic wine to the young, underage Christians.

The negatives outweigh the positives. Grape juice is still wine, just unfermented, so it's still wine. I say leave things as they are.
Sorry, but in most countries and states it is legal for Catholics, Lutherans, Anglicans, etc. to give communion wine to minors for religious purposes. If a parent or alcoholic prefers not, why not offer them grape juice as an alternative. Why must churches impose either one or the other, without offering us the choice?
 
Upvote 0

JDIBe

Senior Member
Oct 3, 2006
1,029
71
Midland, TX
✟16,539.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Koey,
So which is more important, the "fruit of the vine" which Christ called His Blood or the ethanol?

If you wish to use wine during the LS, I see no problem with that, but I think it would be very impractical to take everyone's "drink order":) before the LS. People who prefer alcohol are not offended by grape juice, but people whose concience will not allow them to consume alcohol in that manner probably would be offended by wine. Tolerance runs both ways you know.....
 
Upvote 0

Frame1520

Senior Member
Dec 29, 2005
552
29
44
Cincinnati
Visit site
✟23,354.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Why is it that we claim to be a restoration movement, but find excuses not to restore things?
Restore what?

Jesus had alcoholics in his day too, but drank wine at the last supper, not grape juice. Was he wrong too?
Are you implying that some of the disciples were alcoholics? And no, Jesus was not wrong. Jesus was however perfect, and sinless, which is something that I lack.

Romans 14:21 is often used as an excuse to avoid alcohol, but I notice that nobody avoids foods. Why? Because the temperance movement has hoodwinked us that alcohol is a problem but food not. This is not good reasoning. It also does nothing about Paul who even advised Timothy to drink "a little" wine, nor Christ who was not a teetotaller and did not see the need to avoid it. To make such a conclusion makes Paul contradict Jesus.
I don't recall saying you should or should not drink wine. I merely asked a question...which has me a little confused why you are jumping down my throat as if I said, "Down with alcohol, all you alcohol drinking sinners are going to hell!" What did I say that's got you so worked up?

The idea that avoiding alcohol helps alcoholics also has its critics. Some say that a good example of moderation helps them just as much. But neither argument is a biblical one, but a social argument, outside the Bible. I'm interested in the Bible. Sorry, but I follow Jesus and his example, not legalism.
Ok, so now I don't follow the bible, or Jesus, and I am legalistic? Man, you are really angry about this alcohol thing.

If my brother is weak in the faith and prefers grape juice, that is okay, but let's not impose our lack of faith on others. Some churches offer both, so that the individual may choose according to their faith. That would be my preference too. Then you and I could meet in harmony, me taking my wine and you your grape juice for communion.
Ok, now you are judging the Faith of others based on whether they drink grape juice or wine. Isn't THAT legalistic? Who are you to judge anyone? I'll leave the judging to God.

And again, I never said one way or another where I stand on this topic, so you have put words in my mouth. Perhaps answering the question stated would be better than turning on the person asking the question? Am I alone in this assumption?
 
Upvote 0

Koey

Veteran
Apr 25, 2004
1,059
70
Australia
Visit site
✟24,141.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Please accept my apologies if I "sound" worked up. I am not mad at you. I AM rather tired of the self-righteousness, which we have in our movement. What I am doing is merely trying to discuss or argue (in the positive sense of that word) a point.

My point is that CoC claims to be RM (THE restoration movement). Restoration means to restore things the way they were in the early church. When Christ took an early Passover, and instituted the Lord's Supper, most experts are clear, that he drank wine.

To claim to be restorationist, yet change wine into grape juice, is not restoring anything. It is revisionism. So, all I'm asking is for a little honesty in our movement, instead of the often found self-righteousness that we are the restoration movement. We are not!

If we want to use grape juice, that is just fine and dandy, but let's not call it a restoration, but a revision. It is not from the 1st century, but from the 18th. I would personally prefer being offered a choice, and I would take the wine.
 
Upvote 0

Splayd

Just some guy
Apr 19, 2006
2,547
1,033
53
✟8,071.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I've no problem with using a loaf of bread and a glass of wine for communion. To me it makes no difference either way, but I've heard some good arguments put forward for unleavened bread and grape juice.

Now, I'm in a rush, so I'm not referencing anything right now. Please correct me if necessary but as I understand it the last supper took place as part of the Passover meal. (It's fascinating if you go through the whole thing.) We know that the Israelites used unleavened bread for the Passover because they were in a rush. Likewise it's suggested they used unfermented wine. There's other important symbolism in all of this too. Yeast is used as a symbol to represent sin. The bread used at Passover was free of yeast, just as Christ's body was free of sin. It's also interesting that part of the process of making unleavened bread is to strip it and pierce it. During the meal, it's broken, wrapped in linen and buried. Then it's recovered and purchased by the head of the table before being distributed amongst everyone at the table.

When Christ said "This is my body", He was talking about a broken, striped and pierced piece of bread that was free from yeast (ie: sin) that had been buried and risen and used to pay a price.

Just as the bread was free of yeast (because it was made in a rush), the wine too was free of alcohol (again being made in a rush and not given time to ferment) representing purity and sinlessness in much the same way as the bread did.

Anyway - I'll get into the bones of it all when I get a chance but that's the general gist of it.

Peace
 
Upvote 0

Splayd

Just some guy
Apr 19, 2006
2,547
1,033
53
✟8,071.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Oh incidentally the Greeks have a word for fermented wine. It's "oinos" and it is used 28 times in the NT, though never when describing communion or Passover. There they always use "fruit of the vine" or simply "cup".

Once again I'll stress that it makes little difference to me either way. Both wine and grape juice are "fruit of the vine" and I respect either choice, though as someone with a history of substance abuse, grape juice is the wiser choice for me personally.
 
Upvote 0

Splayd

Just some guy
Apr 19, 2006
2,547
1,033
53
✟8,071.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm BIG on looking at things from the context of those involved. Subsequently, I'm often studying the Jewish practices and understanding of 2nd Temple Judaism to try and appreciate what they heard and/or did from their perspective.

Pretty much everything I've said regarding the bread is 100% true and uncontested. I've partaken in Passover celebrations. (Incidentally - they are incredibly rich in Messianic symbolism. If you ever get the chance, check them out an authentic Jewish festival.) The extension to wine is debated either way.
 
Upvote 0

Koey

Veteran
Apr 25, 2004
1,059
70
Australia
Visit site
✟24,141.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Splayd, I appreciate your good research. May I gently point out that Passover is 6 months after the grape harvest. There was not refrigeration. There was no pasteurization. The idea that some try to insert into history of hanging grapes up until you wanted to squeeze out some juice is of little merit. Have you ever kept grapes longer than a month? It just doesn't work for a time scale of six months later.
 
Upvote 0

Splayd

Just some guy
Apr 19, 2006
2,547
1,033
53
✟8,071.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Splayd, I appreciate your good research. May I gently point out that Passover is 6 months after the grape harvest. There was not refrigeration. There was no pasteurization. The idea that some try to insert into history of hanging grapes up until you wanted to squeeze out some juice is of little merit. Have you ever kept grapes longer than a month? It just doesn't work for a time scale of six months later.
Thanks Koey,
Are you sure about the timing? I'll have to look into it. Passover is part of the Spring festivals and First Fruits isn't long after. I would have imagined that grapes would be ripening around then... BUT I will look into it.

Thanks
 
Upvote 0