- Apr 7, 2004
- 23,587
- 1,245
- 44
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
While I can successfully argue both the historical and religious validness of theistic evolution, unlike the great many of you here, when it comes to science, I am not up to par.
Might any of you perhaps lend a hand here?: http://www.christianforums.com/t5564621-noah-was-just-a-story.html
In particular, I know full well the source he insists to use is invalid due to psuedoscience and eisegesis, but I'm not sure how to defend very well what the article itself is assalting. I'm pretty sure its wrong, and can recall even from my high school years how C-dating is accurate, but it has been MANY years since.
Thanks in advance for any help offered!
Might any of you perhaps lend a hand here?: http://www.christianforums.com/t5564621-noah-was-just-a-story.html
In particular, I know full well the source he insists to use is invalid due to psuedoscience and eisegesis, but I'm not sure how to defend very well what the article itself is assalting. I'm pretty sure its wrong, and can recall even from my high school years how C-dating is accurate, but it has been MANY years since.
Thanks in advance for any help offered!