Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is essentially the place where their actual hypothesis and grandiose claims come to a screeching halt. They're attempting to *yet again* ignore the cause/effect relationships between spacetime curvature and mass/energy, just like they ignore the relationship between electrical current and magnetism. They constantly put the magnetic cart in front of the electrical horse, so of course they put their supernatural (space expanding) mathematical construct *before* the physics that even a non blunderized version of GR theory *attempts* (often imperfectly) to describe.
They did that from the start, with bent spacetime that only told matter how to move, but exerted no force upon it. In other words the magnetic field. So a ball placed at rest on their bent rubber sheet stays where it is placed. Except in real life where the two objects always approach each other, not just the one bending less nothing.This is essentially the place where their actual hypothesis and grandiose claims come to a screeching halt. They're attempting to *yet again* ignore the cause/effect relationships between spacetime curvature and mass/energy, just like they ignore the relationship between electrical current and magnetism. They constantly put the magnetic cart in front of the electrical horse, so of course they put their supernatural (space expanding) mathematical construct *before* the physics that even a non blunderized version of GR theory *attempts* (often imperfectly) to describe.
To them it makes perfect sense that "nothing" can expand, contract, do dances and jigs, sing songs, write poetry, and do anything they claim it does.
Worth repeating: "Honestly, once you start to carefully look the emperors clothing, his entire wardrobe is literally made of 'nothing'.Honestly, once you start to carefully look the emperors clothing, his entire wardrobe is literally made of 'nothing'.
"
Essentially they've dumbed down the whole electrical/magnetic process to simple magnetism and gravity, only they've created a supernatural construct out of a "blunder theory", and something that Alfven called "pseudoscience" not even pure GR, or an (Alfven) acceptable claim in MHD theory. Then again Einstein didn't believe in infinitely dense objects, but that has never stopped astronomers from claiming that GR supports their claims.
You're right of course, and that kind of nonsense is really hindering solar physics research to the point of absurdity at the moment. They know that flux ropes create large magnetic fields around them, but they blindly ignore the current that creates that flux ropes in the first place and that create the powerful magnetic fields in their wake. They ignore the charge separation that drives the physical process, and they dumb the whole thing down to 'magnetism' and 'magnetic reconnection', a concept that Alfven himself called pseudoscience at the same conference where he presented his double layer paper that made that claim obsolete and unnecessary in all current carrying environments. LMSAL's last meeting however was on the topic of 'magnetic reconnection' in the middle of a 'current sheet' no less, as though Alfven's double layer paper was never written!
Ya, an "expanding magnetically reconnecting nothing" to be exact.Worth repeating: "Honestly, once you start to carefully look the emperors clothing, his entire wardrobe is literally made of 'nothing'.
Unfortunately for the mainstream it all requires the flow of current, which is apparently something they simply don't want to discuss.
It's sad mostly because the evidence of the current flowing through the flux ropes is evident in virtually every solar satellite image. The iron ion SDO wavelengths are only made possible because of the large currents that sustain the flux ropes at million degree temperatures. The powerful currents flowing through the flux ropes also leave their magnetic field signature on SDO magnetogram images of the surface of the photosphere. Those currents and high temperature flux ropes leave their heat signatures on every 1600A and 1700A SDO image, and they are the driving force of every flux rope seen in the new IRIS images as well. It's impossible to miss the effect of the currents flowing through the flux ropes, but somehow they do. It's as though the flux ropes are simply dumbed down to two simple magnetic lines, with a current sheet that forms between them. They are not simple magnetic lines, they are current carrying *threads of pinched plasma* to start with! Their entire argument is based on an oversimplification fallacy. 
Yes, E was patently against the idea of a singularity existing as anything more than a mathematical abstract. Of course E was wrong when it comes to everything they want to ignore, but right in everything they want to keep.
We know.
I don't believe that particle physicists are trying to take EM fields out of the atom, I think they just don't have a clue how to make it work right using an EM field model (yet). I think they'll make steady progress on that front however, because it's pure 'experimental physics'.
IMO this is a most disconcerting behavior. They subjectively pick and choose, and mix and match, and take what they please from Einstein's body of work, and from Alfven's work on MHD theory, and they basically ignore everything each of them said in *key* areas of physics. They continue to write about something Alfven called "pseudoscience" (magnetic reconnection), and they base all of their cosmology beliefs on a version of the GR formulas that Einstein himself referred to a 'blunder'.
I don't believe that particle physicists are trying to take EM fields out of the atom, I think they just don't have a clue how to make it work right using an EM field model (yet). I think they'll make steady progress on that front however, because it's pure 'experimental physics'.
Lambda-CDM however is really myth making with math, and even when key components like SUSY hypotheses do fail spectacularly in the lab, astronomers still point at the sky and claim that excess positrons are "evidence" of WIMP annihilation.
Yes well, what can one expect from SN models that are based upon faulty star models to begin with?
True. Then again his 'constant' was only intended to keep an otherwise imploding universe from imploding. He never tried to get 'space' to do any magic expansion tricks even with his one brief stint with a "blunder" theory.
That depends on whether the constant is a *real* (empirically demonstrated) form of nature, say an ordinary EM field, or a *supernatural* construct that's otherwise shy around the lab.
In a static universe, a Euclidean model is one of the *simplest* models to work with. It's only *if* the universe is expanding or contracting, or we're talking about high velocity/massively heavy physics that GR is the "natural" geometric preference. I hate to break it to you, but we can (and often do) cruise around our solar system just fine on Newtonian concepts of gravity too. In a mostly plasma universe, MHD theory is the more "obvious" mathematical model to explain *many* cosmic phenomenon. GR theory isn't necessarily the 'be-all-end-all' in describing the physics of a mostly plasma universe. That's why you need all that supernatural ad hoc gap filler in fact.
Actually, GR does in fact 'better' predict the orbit or Mercury, so it has value even within the solar system.
That's obviously quite true, and it's also obvious that they *never* intend to explore EM field influences in galactic rotation curves. It's 'too scary'. They might actually come up with a "solution" that doesn't require exotic matter if they did that, particularly since they just found more mass in the form of plasma than we had found in the whole of human history up until last year. Not coincidentally that million degree plasma is located *exactly* where 'dark matter' is supposedly located.
It's certainly *not* a problem for particle physicists. The 'problem' is however, that standard cosmology *dogma* absolutely, positively *demands* that 'exotic stuff' must exist. Particle physicists have *always* considered SUSY theories to be a "dark horse". It's only the cosmology community that seems to be 'betting the farm" on exotic forms of matter and energy.
I think that EU/PC community fails to appreciate the usefulness of GR theory, only because they've seen GR theory *abused* for so long. It actually is useful in predicting orbits of planets, and useful in a *limited* way. Likewise plasma physics alone won't *completely* describe the behaviors of all objects in the solar system. Combine them however, and I do think it would be possible to create very *useful* galaxy models and very useful cosmology models. One without the other however will always be 'incomplete' IMO.
