Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Except the bible state past is backed up by the bible. Since science cannot back up any state in the past, it stands supreme. Undaunted. Mighty. True.
Very simple to prove. Just name a few so called methods of science for dating, and voila...same state past basis for all. Every single one. NO exceptions. It is total religion, absolute fraud and utter deception.
Wrong. Totally wrong. I am saying that the processes that existed in the former state also were active and affecting the ratios. NOT in the way OUR present forces and laws do though, of course. Then we add to that CREATION itself.
Since I just dashed your misconception about my position, there is no need to address that strawman.
Absurd. Let's get this straight the former nature was not the present state or the present state changed, or accelerated, or bent out of shape or etc etc. The former state was different and NOT this state. WE are the change. To know how we changed we would need to know exactly what the former nature was. Science doesn't. Not at all. It doesn't so much as know there ever was any former state!!!!!!!!! Pathetic.
No. One assumes that after the fall, the big change was after the flood in the days of Peleg. It was in his day the earth was split...divided.
Close. Peleg was, by some accounts a century or two after the flood. That allows for rapid evolving of animals, the fast separating of continents..lower lifespans, etc.
Except the bible state past is backed up by the bible.
It's called hand waving. Justaway all the pesky facts and just keep making things up.
Nothing to say still, eh?
By the fact the methods are all the same .. every single one. ALL based on the foolish little satanic belief system of claiming the past was the same state. End of story.
Because you cannot show that the ratios represent anything formed in this state.
The point is that since science doesn't know they can shut their mouth.So what? The wizarding world is backed up by the Harry Potter series. What's your point? Just because it is in an old book doesn't mean it is real. If you want me to accept that something is real, show me that thing IN REALITY.
Not in any way. I merely point out they do not know what state it was. That relegates them to the intellectual sewer on issues of creation.You complaining about science does not show that your position is true.
My point exactly, science has no evidence for the foundation of their models for the past.So? All you are saying is that you have no scientific evidence for your claims. And with no evidence, why should I believe a word you say?
Former.So was the rapid evolution in the present state or past state?
Yes all methods of radioactive dating have the same belief set for a basis. This is news?QED!
!
No, you have tried to claim they represent something based on the present state with no proof.We can, and have shown what they represent.
False. They only represent a fantasy past of non existent ages! There is no match in reality whatsoever.They represent a same state past because they match what we should see from a same state past.
This one is really funny. Science is a method, not a person to shut a mouth....The point is that since science doesn't know they can shut their mouth.
This one is funny.Very simple to prove. Just name a few so called methods of science for dating, and voila...same state past basis for all. Every single one. NO exceptions. It is total religion, absolute fraud and utter deception.
The point is that since science doesn't know they can shut their mouth.
Not in any way. I merely point out they do not know what state it was. That relegates them to the intellectual sewer on issues of creation.
My point exactly, science has no evidence for the foundation of their models for the past.
Former.
No, you have tried to claim they represent something based on the present state with no proof.
False. They only represent a fantasy past of non existent ages! There is no match in reality whatsoever.
Who cares? Long as we see that science doesn't know, the bible is uncontested.Guess who doesn't know either?
The persons publish the fables in the name of science talk a lot. They never shut up.This one is really funny. Science is a method, not a person to shut a mouth....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?