Mike Warnke did admit some failures, and he was a novice in ministry... He was saved from a life of sin, Satanism, and drugs... He too soon came into the ministry, without adequate spiritual training. He failed in financial accountability, and did not adequately protect himself from several other temptations. He repented, set up financial accountability with a reputable company who then reported that all was now honest, fair and acceptable.
The Christian Research group, who is very strict, some years after the Cornerstone expose, did some research and found the 'cornerstone' group had an agenda in their attack on MW and others who opposed Satanism... and that group was advocating 'goddess worship' and condoning homosexuality... the Christian Research group said their attack on Mike Warnke was hostile and ill intended.
It is time we take a look at attacks... I am here in this thread, evaluate what the Bible says on 'strange fire', not trying to validate what John MacArthur is going to say in his conference, or in his book. I do not even know what it is.
I know there will be much I do not agree with in his book, since I am not a cessationist. I have been presenting what the Bible says about 'strange fire', so I have adequate knowledge on the Biblical subject to evaluate and test what John MacArthur says.
Some have said I am defending him, helping him, and probably due to these attacks, some of might think I am him... LOL I tire of the unjustified attacks, and the one on Mike Warnke is also a misrepresentation of what is actually truth. He was not perfect, neither am I, neither are you... but the harsh, some untrue, unforgiving attitude of some is horrible.
When John MacArthur speaks, when his book comes out, I will judge it by its doctrine, by its accuracy of charges... I do not come here to attack persons, but their teachings. If John MacArthur is accurate in his interpretation of Scripture on strange fire, I will say so, unafraid of the attackers here. I will not be intimidated or scared off by unjustified and false charges like have already been made.
If John MacArthur is un-Scriptural, and says untrue things about the ones he is to expose, I will condemn the action, and still pray for the man. Somehow, I feel that way is better than the 'attack the man' philosophy. We are told to
'pray for them who despitefully use you and persecute you' and that is my way of handling even some here.
The 'attack the person' is far more common than it should be. Mike Warnke could use prayers. The Cornerstone newspaper misrepresented much, came to unwarranted and untrue conclusions, and it was done purposely... and proven by Christian Research, The 'attack the man' philosophy is so widely accepted, few will ever give him an opportunity...
Jimmy Swaggart failed and repented... Jim Bakker failed and repented... both might fail again... but they have to get in line behind us in that... This 'attack' syndrome is why many never accepted Paul, for while Saul, he helped in stoning Stephen. We could judge Peter for his denials of the Lord, and we could judge David for his seduction of Bathsheba, his involvement in the death of her husband... Wow... why not start a denomination of attacking all that have failed??? I speak in sarcasm... for a mirror in such a church would likely be broken the first day, for in it, they would see the person they should be judging.
So... ATTACKERS.. GO FOR IT. Keep misrepresenting what I say, misquote me, insult me, harass me, and enjoy it. I am going to continue to still teach what the Bible says, and not join your ways.
The Christian Research group, who is very strict, some years after the Cornerstone expose, did some research and found the 'cornerstone' group had an agenda in their attack on MW and others who opposed Satanism... and that group was advocating 'goddess worship' and condoning homosexuality... the Christian Research group said their attack on Mike Warnke was hostile and ill intended.
It is time we take a look at attacks... I am here in this thread, evaluate what the Bible says on 'strange fire', not trying to validate what John MacArthur is going to say in his conference, or in his book. I do not even know what it is.
I know there will be much I do not agree with in his book, since I am not a cessationist. I have been presenting what the Bible says about 'strange fire', so I have adequate knowledge on the Biblical subject to evaluate and test what John MacArthur says.
Some have said I am defending him, helping him, and probably due to these attacks, some of might think I am him... LOL I tire of the unjustified attacks, and the one on Mike Warnke is also a misrepresentation of what is actually truth. He was not perfect, neither am I, neither are you... but the harsh, some untrue, unforgiving attitude of some is horrible.
When John MacArthur speaks, when his book comes out, I will judge it by its doctrine, by its accuracy of charges... I do not come here to attack persons, but their teachings. If John MacArthur is accurate in his interpretation of Scripture on strange fire, I will say so, unafraid of the attackers here. I will not be intimidated or scared off by unjustified and false charges like have already been made.
If John MacArthur is un-Scriptural, and says untrue things about the ones he is to expose, I will condemn the action, and still pray for the man. Somehow, I feel that way is better than the 'attack the man' philosophy. We are told to
'pray for them who despitefully use you and persecute you' and that is my way of handling even some here.
The 'attack the person' is far more common than it should be. Mike Warnke could use prayers. The Cornerstone newspaper misrepresented much, came to unwarranted and untrue conclusions, and it was done purposely... and proven by Christian Research, The 'attack the man' philosophy is so widely accepted, few will ever give him an opportunity...
Jimmy Swaggart failed and repented... Jim Bakker failed and repented... both might fail again... but they have to get in line behind us in that... This 'attack' syndrome is why many never accepted Paul, for while Saul, he helped in stoning Stephen. We could judge Peter for his denials of the Lord, and we could judge David for his seduction of Bathsheba, his involvement in the death of her husband... Wow... why not start a denomination of attacking all that have failed??? I speak in sarcasm... for a mirror in such a church would likely be broken the first day, for in it, they would see the person they should be judging.
So... ATTACKERS.. GO FOR IT. Keep misrepresenting what I say, misquote me, insult me, harass me, and enjoy it. I am going to continue to still teach what the Bible says, and not join your ways.
Upvote
0