• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Reading the Da Vinci Code

Hishandmaiden

The Humble Servant
Site Supporter
Jan 11, 2002
6,382
229
42
Singapore
✟35,969.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
P/S: For those who are weak in the faith, please don't read the Da Vinci Code, it really does have many bad things inside. But God often brings out the good in a bad book, if you are forced to read if as a part of the university requirement. Do not read it, if you do not have to read it.

Yesterday, as part of my university module, I was forced to read the Da Vinci Code. It was not a book that I wanted to read, but in the end, I read it.

Well, when I touched it, I was like... er... I am touching something that will stumble... stumble... stumble my christian walk with God. I am touching something evil, something bad.

I heard that there were many bad references inside the book about Jesus, about Mary, about agh... their relationships, and about the Catholic Church.

When I read it, well, I saw a person. I saw a man who was not a believer of God, who was seeing the church from outside the perspective of the church.

To his outsider's eyes, he could not understand why the church was so bent to destroy other religions, religions like the pagan religion which was harmless to him but harmful to the Christians.

What was wrong with sex? Why was the church so against woman? Corporal mortification... why did people in this Catholic organization like to hurt themselves so much?

To us—the Christians, what he wrote was not true, of course. We are not weirdoes. Not all of us hurt ourselves that much, and we are not that crazy about money, either. We are not like that bishop who was the head of that Opex something.


Yet, in the eyes of a non-believer, their views of the church could often be quite different from the eyes of the Christians.

Flawed as he was, that bishop, who was being mocked repeatedly in the Dan Brown novel, he did have one good point. He really did care for Silas, and he did give a second chance to that assassin who the rest of the world could not be bothered with and would have forgotten and abandoned.

Even as a non-believer, Dan Brown with all his criticisms and anger of the church did recognize one thing which the Christian Church, which God, in Christ, gave to the entire world--Forgiveness.

Forgiveness was God's greatest gift to the world, and this was the word of the greed-driven but sincere bishop to Silas. The bishop forgave Silas for shooting him and the bishop wanted Silas to forgive also the one who had double-crossed them.

I felt that in the midst of all kinds of discouragements (Agh... all this leonardo thing, all this John is bigger than Jesus thing, all this crazy theory about Jesus having children, all this portrayal of greed-driven catholic priest who love both faith and money and all this bad message being written repeatedly in the book about the Christian church), there is at least one thing good in here. Forgiveness. Forgiveness for the wicked, for the unwanted, for people like Silas, which the Christian God, and the Christian church that represent Him did give to the world.


And I realized that this Dan Brown was not the scrum that I thought he was, not that satanic guy which I felt he must be, because I had heard so many things from my Christian friends about the book and him that did not really paint a … er… very nice picture of him in my eyes. He was just a normal human being, who saw the church and Christianity and God from an outsider’s perspective.
To me, I had been to the Holy of holies. I had tasted the goodness of Christ. I had witnessed and encountered Him face to face and tasted the pleasure of being in His presence. To him, God is someone he is not even sure is real or fake, God is distant, God is far away, and God may even be the imagination, the product of the human mind.

I am of the spiritual world, seeing things in the span of eternity. I had seen God and know that there is only one God, and therefore know why He commands us to destroy all the other religions, so that no one will be led astray to other religions. He is of earth, and he sees thing from an earthly point of view. From an earthly perspective, he saw the Christians building larger and larger church. From the earthly perspective, he saw Christians fighting in wars. From the earthly perspective, he saw many politics that occurred in the secular world occurred in the church of God as well, and he reflected all these unsightly thing he saw in his story.

He is like the gentile, who can only access God through the outer court, the court of the gentile, and it is at the court of the gentile where the buying and selling of sparrows took place. No wonder Jesus chased all the money changers and the sellers out of the temple. We had given the outsiders the perspective that we Christians were very business minded, and were sincere in God … er… and Money.

Minus all the bad things about the church which Dan Brown see from his outsider and non-spiritual perspective, he did notice one good thing about the Christian church, which will reflect very well on our God.

In his novel, while the bishop was greedy for money, the bishop did have a heart for the sheep that was under his care. The bishop, on discovering he was double-crossed by the teacher, tried all means and ways to locate Silas, who was really like a son to him. In the end, in spite of how Silas was the one who shot him, the bishop told Silas to remember one thing from him—forgiveness.

Dan Brown notices that Christians, with all our flaws and imperfections, are often active in doing good works for the world around us. We may be greedy people, but some of us do have this redeeming feature in his eyes about us—we give second chance to people who others don’t give a second chance to. No one will want to give a second chance to Silas, a condemned criminal, an unwanted, abandoned youth, with no name, but the bishop gave a second chance, a new life to this ghost that no one else notices.

I guess non-believer like Dan Brown may also see the good side of the Christian church, even though they also see our many bad sides. He can see us giving prisoners and outcasts in society a new meaning in life, a chance to start afresh a life which is like a ghost. As much he had seen the wars we fight, the money-seeking mind we appear to have, he also noticed our prison ministry to the undeserving, and our outreach to the poor and outcasts in society.

The bishop in the novel is sincere. Dan Brown may make fun of his bigoted mind in which he see everyone in the world as being against him, and he cannot see why the world will hate him and go against his religious conviction. But the bishop is at least sincere in what he believes in. He feels for his sheep, for those people under his care that he feels he is watching over for God.


In the end, he tries every mean to help Silas. He tries to look for his sheep. He also tries to redeem the sins that his sheep has committed by giving away all the money in his possession to the relatives of those whom Silas had murdered. The money is so precious to him, since his church, his million dollars church is on the brink of a crumple, and yet he gives up the money that may possibly save the church, to redeem the crime of someone who is a ghost that no one else notices, that he sees and he forgives.

Dan Brown notices the good works that Christians had done all through the centuries as much as the bad things he notices about us, and he makes reference to it as well.

The bishop is greedy and money-minded and that is his flaw. He wants to have both faith and God. Dan Brown the bigoted perspective of the church in their conservativeness and overly liberalism at times. He mocks the money-mindedness of the church and also the wars which we Christians sometimes go into over the centuries for our religions. He mocks our naïve beliefs in God, our over-dependence on faith, to the point that we often forget about reasons. But there is one thing Dan Brown respects about Christians in his book, Da Vinci code. He respects the fact that we notice the ghost of society--the transparent people who are in need of help that no one else notices. People like Silas who is abandoned, who is a murderer, who is unredeemable in the eyes of the world, who the bishop, who the Christians are willing to give a chance and new life to. Dan Brown may not agree with our views on God and other religions, but he does respect the second chance we give to people like Silas, and the message of forgiveness which we preach, which our God commands us to preach to the rest of the world.


”Forgiveness is God’s greatest gift.” That is what the bishop says to Silas, when he is being pushed away to the operation room. He forgives Silas, someone he treats as a son, and loves as a son, someone who no one else wants to give a chance to. At least, Dan Brown does recognize some good in a Christian. Our God forgives.


I feel a heart to pray for Dan Brown and the non believers of the world that they may know Him who forgives them. I feel a heart to pray for the church, both the Christian and catholic church that we will be lights of the world and not love the world and money so much. And I think we need to be on our knees more often.
 

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,869
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Why not read it? It's a great story.

It's pretty mediocre. He cuts the "suspects" down to one possible suspect, and when you're waiting to see how he'll pull off it's not him he... doesn't. He also writes rather formulatic and if you want to read one of his books, read Demons and Angels. It's better, and most of his stories follow the same path.
 
Upvote 0

Hishandmaiden

The Humble Servant
Site Supporter
Jan 11, 2002
6,382
229
42
Singapore
✟35,969.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Why not read it? It's a great story.
I heard it had many stuffs in it that were quite anti-biblical, like for instance, he did mention that bible is written by men, not God.

Unless I had to read it for my module, I wouldn't read it.
 
Upvote 0

wiggsfly

Walking the tightrope of life
Nov 20, 2005
3,187
158
✟4,140.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Its still a story. If it was a textbook I might have a problem there, but just like horror movies and all osrts of other stories it is meant to entertain pure and simple. If you want to read one that is rather blantantly anti-christian try The Last Templar (I forget the author). There isn't much of a plot line and just emphasis of the authors theory that Jesus wrote a gospel claiming he wasn't the son of God.
 
Upvote 0
D

DanielJamesSimon

Guest
Thanks for your post, Hishandmaiden. I agree that Dan Brown and people like him are people we need to remember in prayer. It's sad to see people research Christianity and the Bible so thoroughly, which Brown obviously did, and still come out with the wrong story.

I hadn't actually thought much about the book in quite the same way as you. It does portray Christianity as at least showing forgiveness, etc., in a way that the rest of the world doesn't.

I think the danger of the book, though, is that it attacks Christianity on a much deeper level. Almost everyone, atheists included, can see the good works of the church and the characteristics such as forgiveness. Acknowledging these traits of the church is all very well, but Dan Brown (rather blatantly) attacked the very foundations of Christianity, from the validity of the Bible to Jesus Christ Himself, basically calling the whole of Christian history a cleverly devised fraud. Nobody reading the book would deny the good works of the church that everyone can see on the surface, but the non-Christian who's searching for answers could easily be deceived by the apparently thorough and in depth research Brown appears to have done. Even new Christians could be deceived. I think by making sure he recognised the positive aspects of the church that nobody would deny, and then attacking the history and validity of the church on a more "academic" level, Dan Brown has created what seems to be a feasible attack on Christianity.

The greatest danger is that, while a fictional story, it uses what Dan Brown considers "historical facts" as the foundations of the story. Like using World War II for fiction; it's built on facts. Trouble is, The Da Vinci Code is built on, well, some truth, some half-truths, and some lies.

I have worried before that it's quite possible the Code could have adverse effects on society's attitudes of the church if people start to buy into all its lies, but on the other hand, some have pointed out that all the controversy surrounding the book, especially when the movie came out (I haven't seen the movie), actually brought society and pop culture into closer contact with Christianity than it is normally; at least it's bringing Christianity into the mainstream, in a sense. Maybe the controversy surrounding it will end up raising people's interest in Christianity and outweight the negative effects the book itself would have... here's hoping anyway.

But I'd be with you in urging new Christians or those weak in the faith to avoid it, or at least, if they must read it, to do so carefully making sure they always keep in mind that it's written by a critic of Christianity and the Bible and the church, and really just taking it as a work of pure fiction.

Besides all that, it wasn't even really that good a book... I much preferred Angels and Demons and his other book Deception Point was even better (Deception Point was much less anti-Christian than the others but still quite antagonistic towards Christianity in parts).
 
Upvote 0

Hishandmaiden

The Humble Servant
Site Supporter
Jan 11, 2002
6,382
229
42
Singapore
✟35,969.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Its still a story. If it was a textbook I might have a problem there, but just like horror movies and all osrts of other stories it is meant to entertain pure and simple. If you want to read one that is rather blantantly anti-christian try The Last Templar (I forget the author). There isn't much of a plot line and just emphasis of the authors theory that Jesus wrote a gospel claiming he wasn't the son of God.
It was my textbook for one of my modules in school. A compulsory textbook. That was the ONLY reason why I read it.
 
Upvote 0

Live4HimAndLoveOthers

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2007
853
45
Florida
Visit site
✟23,782.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I saw the movie, but I did not read the book. A Christian friend said the book is much better than the movie. When watching the movie, at the end, I found it so ridiculous that I had to strain really hard not to burst out laughing. But I held back out of respect for the audience. I ran to the door entrance as soon as the movie ended, and handed out gospel tracts to everyone coming out of the movie.
 
Upvote 0

GrinningDwarf

Just a humble servant
Mar 30, 2005
2,732
276
61
✟34,311.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
I saw the movie, but I did not read the book. A Christian friend said the book is much better than the movie.

I read the book a couple of years ago, mainly because people in my congregation kept asking me about it. (I'm an elder at a tiny little non-denominational country church.) I intentionally avoided the movie for a long time...but my wife rented it a couple of months ago, so I've finally seen it and now I can compare the two.

Robert Langdon in the movie, played by Tom Hanks, is much more sympathetic towards Christianity than the Robert Langdon in the book. When Sir Leigh Teabing goes through his anti-Christian rant in the movie, Langdon argues with him, pointing out the flaws in the theories. In the book, Langdon agrees with Teabring totally; the issues aren't even debated.
 
Upvote 0

GrinningDwarf

Just a humble servant
Mar 30, 2005
2,732
276
61
✟34,311.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
What I find most interesting about this book is the fact that it became so hugely successful. There are many books (every year) dealing with the same theories and issues.

So why did this one book become so popular?

I would say there are two elements contributing to this book's success...

1. Americans love conspiracy theories. Look at all of the excitement surrounding the ubiquitous Kennedy conspiracies...and the 9/11 theories...and the Hurricane Katrina theories...

2. These theories were put in the setting of an easily accessable fiction book. As much as people love conspiracies, I don't think Americans on the whole are literate enough to pick up an Elaine Pagels book on the same topic, because Pagels' book would read too much like a textbook. Fiction has a history of reaching the masses where more academic works do not...two examples would be Uncle Tom's Cabin, which helped feed the pre-Civil War abolishonist movement, and Stranger in a Strange Land, which helped feed the '60s anti-establishment movements.
 
Upvote 0

IzzyPop

I wear my sunglasses at night...
Jun 2, 2007
5,379
438
52
✟37,709.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I wanted the 4 hours of my life I spent reading the steaming pile back. It raised some interesting ideas, but his style is an affront to literate individuals everywhere. His characters have almost as much complexity as the lead of a low budget action flick. Pacing wasn't bad, but the potting was imbecilic. Good thing the plot involved God or else he would have had to create one to put the deus in deus ex machina.
 
Upvote 0

Jeriel

Live life to the beat of your own drum!
May 31, 2007
1,046
198
Home
✟32,006.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I saw the movie, but I did not read the book. A Christian friend said the book is much better than the movie. When watching the movie, at the end, I found it so ridiculous that I had to strain really hard not to burst out laughing. But I held back out of respect for the audience. I ran to the door entrance as soon as the movie ended, and handed out gospel tracts to everyone coming out of the movie.
lol, no kidding! I saw it because I wanted to know what all the talk was about, and I found it totally unbelievable and ridiculous. I thought it was like some cheap copy of National Treasure, only dealing with religion instead of American history.
 
Upvote 0