Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
RIGHT!What I find most amusing is when pre-Tribulation Rapturists take 1 Thessalonians 4 and try to say it refers to the Rapture. I want to know how you can possibly read that and not come to the conclusion it refers to the Second Coming.
The FIRST RESURRECTION/rapture is at the Lord's 2nd Adent, immediately followed by God's Wrath, then the Mill. reign begins. There is no indicated that anyone is saved during this 1,000 years. The SECOND RESURRECTION (those who did not partake of the first) will consist of all the rest of the dead, raised up, and judged at the Great White Throne
Greetings Justme,Justme said:Hi Ernie,
The bible is an amazing book. Even more amazing is the number of different ways the words of that bible are understood. If you have time I would like to go thru this particular topic verse by verse. As you know I don't agree with your understanding, but I would like to follow thru with you to see how you developed that understanding.
Let's start with Daniel 12.
The End Times
1 "At that time Michael, the great prince who protects your people, will arise. There will be a time of distress such as has not happened from the beginning of nations until then. But at that time your people-everyone whose name is found written in the book-will be delivered. 2 Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt
I see this 'time of distress' as being the 'great tribulation' of Matthew 24. Is this your understanding as well?
Justme
Yep, we on the same page.Yes, I believe the "time of distress" is the same as the "great tribulation".
Okay. We shall go step by step and I will add my comments as we go along.I agree with lots of your posts, but not the sequence of events of these resurrections as I understand it now.
Good to hear that.Yep, we on the same page.
This is interesting, recently I have heard a spate of teaching on the OT saints and where they are now. Keep in mind, I see the cross as the dividing line between the OT and the NT, so the "first resurrection" applies to a "future resurrection".The next thing I look at is the first resurrection of Rev 20.
Verses 4 and 6 spell out who the participants in the first resurrection are and as I see it lay out the parameters of who can be included in this first resurrection.
They must have been in contact with the tribulation in order to resist the beast.
The participants are blessed and will take part in the 1000 year reign with Christ.
I guess my main concern is that Daniel who sleeps in the dust til the happenings of Daniel 12:1-3 could not be part of the so-called first resurrection. Daniel did not see the great tribulation. Daniel was not beheaded. Daniel was not a martyr.
Yes, I understand that you consider the 'first resurrection' to be future. I consider the 'first resurrection' to be PRIOR to the parousia. As we go thru this it will clear up as to whether there is any biblical significance to that, I hope.Keep in mind, I see the cross as the dividing line between the OT and the NT, so the "first resurrection" applies to a "future resurrection".
Greetings Justme,Justme said:However, what I was getting at specifically is if Daniel himself will be raised AFTER the people of the 'first resurrection?' In my mind Daniel could not qualify as part of the first so would have to be part of the 'rest of the dead' as spoken of in Rev 20: 5.
Let's look at the verse:yet Jesus clearly says no one has ever gone to Heaven as He walked the earth early in His ministry.
Well, about all I can offer in the way of Eph. 4:8 is another translation that seems clearer.You will first have to address the verses I quoted, particularly "he led captives captive".
I use Daniel 12 here.So when and where do the scriptures say what happened to Daniel et al. of the OT?
Yes, and even tho there is the confusing verse John 3:13 which says:I think I mentioned that I believe Moses and Elijah are in heaven along with Enoch.
You also feel that all who are not in the first resurrection are doomed to the lake of fire.So those of the OT MUST be included somewhere among all the saints, and all we have is the "firstfruits", "the First Resurrection" and "those who did not partake of the First Resurrection
You also feel that all who are not in the first resurrection are doomed to the lake of fire.
Because of the wording of 1 Thess 4:13-18 I can't follow that all not in the first resurrection are in the lake of fire. There is the rest of the dead and then there are those who are alive at the time of the parousia that are raised.
All of this leads me to conclude that the first resurrection is prior to the parousia and therefore occurs only in the Heavenly realm.
Could you point out where you feel those who are alive at the parousia fall into this?
No problem at all.I'm sorry this is sort of rambling. It's late and I'm tired.
I see some merit in this, but we explain it different. I'm also going to go back thru a bit and get a better grasp of your meaning from earlier posts.May I suggest this also supports the idea that the Lord led the OT saints captive to heaven.
I see the resurrection of the just and the unjust at the same time..at the parousia. That resurrection I see as the one talked about in Daniel 12. That is the ones who 'sleep' which would include Daniel himself. However, that means they would be the 'rest of the dead' of Rev 20:5 and they would be AFTER the so-called 'first' resurrection or the 1000 year reign with Christ.At the Lord's 2nd Advent, the resurrection of the just shall occur. The rapture of the living "remnant" shall occur subsequent to this, but the exact time of it, doesn't seem to be clear, I believe it to be a relatively short time afterward.
Dad Ernie said:Greetings All,
There IS a rapture, but it is AFTER the First Resurrection, consists of only a very small remnant (those who are alive and remain), and comes AFTER the Tribulation period, BUT prior to God's outpouring WRATH on the unbelievers.
Blessings,
Dad Ernie
You see I don't see that. Simply put Daniel was one who 'slept'. Those who 'sleep' are not of the first resurrection, but after it.I believe ALL the saints, living and dead are revealed here.
You see I don't see that. Simply put Daniel was one who 'slept'. Those who 'sleep' are not of the first resurrection, but after it.
You see I don't see that. Simply put Daniel was one who 'slept'. Those who 'sleep' are not of the first resurrection, but after it.
However, I enjoyed talking with you and it was fruitful. While looking thru some of your references I noticed 1 Peter 1 which for the first time I saw was talking about that elusive elect.
I owe you, thanks.
Justme
I'm not concerned if anybody has beliefs as I do or not. I find the the bible to be the ultimate mystery and someday I hope to know what it actually means.You will have to come up with something more than you have if you want anyone to believe you,
And why don't you believe he was a part of the "firstfruits"? Have you any reason why he would be judged at the Great White Throne Judgment? What scriptural support do you have?
And why don't you believe he was a part of the "firstfruits"? Have you any reason why he would be judged at the Great White Throne Judgment? What scriptural support do you have?
Well, let's see. You also put forth that the word 'rest' has some significance here.It does not say that Daniel would "sleep" implying his body would remain lying in the grave.
The word lot also fits in perfectly with:The word "lot" means he shall receive his "portion", which fits in perfectly with:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?