Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Mark,
Good words.
Non-dispensationalists are precipitous when we deny the rapture entirely.
The Bible clearly teaches a 'catching up' of the saints.
Ethan_Fetch said:I see no difference in kind between The Tribulation® and the pain and persecution the church has been suffering for 2000 years. All I see is an increase in its intensity as we near the time of Christ's return.
God has not spared us 2000 years of trouble, I do not believe He will spare us it's final culmination, not is there any real biblical reason for believing He will.
If it were not for the mercy and grace of our Lord none of us would be even discussing this. There would be no such thing as Christianforums.com. All of us would be utterly forsaken and without hope.
I can think of two biblical reasons off the top of my head for believing the Church will not be around for the Tribulation.
1. Noah and his family were pulled out of harms way when God poured out His wrath via the Flood.
2. The Israelites were kept out of harms way when the angel of death was sent as the last plague upon Egypt.
Believers escaping God's wrath seems to my mind to be His "modus operandi".
peace
sawdust said:I don't really know enough to truly debate this but I'm hoping others who do know more pick up on this.
There is a difference "in kind" because the pain and persecution the Church has suffered for 2000 years has been due to the work of evil in this world but the pain and suffering that will occur during the Tribulation is due to God's wrath being poured out. To say they are of the same "kind" is to suggest God works evil.
Not really sure whether to laugh or cry at this??!!
If it were not for the mercy and grace of our Lord none of us would be even discussing this. There would be no such thing as Christianforums.com. All of us would be utterly forsaken and without hope.
I can think of two biblical reasons off the top of my head for believing the Church will not be around for the Tribulation.
1. Noah and his family were pulled out of harms way when God poured out His wrath via the Flood.
2. The Israelites were kept out of harms way when the angel of death was sent as the last plague upon Egypt.
Believers escaping God's wrath seems to my mind to be His "modus operandi".
peace
genez said:Sir? Okkayyyyyy....
The earth will still be with us.
genez said:Nations will still exist.
Zechariah 8:23 niv
"This is what the LORD Almighty says: "In those days ten men from all languages and nations will take firm hold of one Jew by the hem of his robe and say, 'Let us go with you, because we have heard that God is with you.'
genez said:The city you speak of will be above the new earth, which will replace this earth AFTER the Millennium is over. Yet, this earth will be drastically transformed for the 1000 year reign of Christ.
Isaiah 11:6-7 (New International Version)
"The wolf will live with the lamb,
the leopard will lie down with the goat,
the calf and the lion and the yearling together;
and a little child will lead them.
The cow will feed with the bear,
their young will lie down together,
and the lion will eat straw like the ox."
genez said:Why have a city above a burned out planet? Makes no sense. Perfection mixed with destruction? Not a good concept.
genez said:Obvious, schmovious.....
Barns are of the earth. On land.
After all? Barns are for FARMS. There will be no barns in Heaven.
Ethan_Fetch said:God's wrath doesn't happen until Christ has already returned and the saints are with Him, so, obviously they will not experience His wrath.
Tonks said:Not in the silly "Left Behind" sense if that is what you are asking - the idea is so far outside the bounds of orthodoxy that one cannot even see it.
adam332 said:Hmmm....when you say tribulation are you defining that as God's wrath, aka the plagues? Tribulation upon the Saints comes from man. There is no Biblical indication that I can find that tells us; God's wrath = tribulation.
The Israelites were covered from the harm that was caused by God's plagues. But, they still had their burdens increased by the Egyptians. As God smited the wicked, the wicked then took it out on God's people.
There is no record, that I'm aware of, in the scriptures regarding Noah being persecuted. But, it is pretty much considered so by the vast majority of Christians, Jews and Muslims. The Quran actually says that he was, but I don't think I'll be wagering on the accuracy of the Quran anytime soon.
My point is that he probably was....
There is no reason to think in the time which the plagues are coming down upon us, that wicked men won't be taking it out of the righteous.. thus the righteous WILL endure tribulation.
adam332 said:Wrong. The coming of Christ is the last plague.
adam332 said:During the millennium? No they wont, they will be brought low...the very elements will melt like wax. That verse you quoted above has absolutely nothing to do with the millenium.
The verse you quoted above is probably from the timeline of the new earth, not during the mellinnium. It is after the millennium and the second death that we find no more death or sorrow.
No one said there will be barns in heaven, it's called symbolism. You don't think that he will leave us behind and take some literal wheat with him, of course not!
By your way of reckoning, He has gone to prepare our "mansions" in his heavenly city, but mansions are for the ground, right? So that means we all get to go to beverly hills at the second coming according, right?
sawdust said:I can think of two biblical reasons off the top of my head for believing the Church WILL NOT be around for the Tribulation.
1. Noah and his family were pulled out of harms way when God poured out His wrath via the Flood.
2. The Israelites were kept out of harms way when the angel of death was sent as the last plague upon Egypt.
Believers escaping God's wrath seems to my mind to be His "modus operandi".
Ethan_Fetch said:Why does He protect them from His punishment but not that of the world?
sawdust said:
This doesn't seem right. Revelation 16 is the chapter that deals with the completeness of God's wrath yet none of the seven bowls seem to indicate Christ's return.
The seventh angel poured out his bowl into the air, and out of the temple came a loud voice from the throne, saying, "It is done!" 18Then there came flashes of lightning, rumblings, peals of thunder and a severe earthquake. No earthquake like it has ever occurred since man has been on earth, so tremendous was the quake. 19The great city split into three parts, and the cities of the nations collapsed. God remembered Babylon the Great and gave her the cup filled with the wine of the fury of his wrath. 20Every island fled away and the mountains could not be found. 21From the sky huge hailstones of about a hundred pounds each fell upon men. And they cursed God on account of the plague of hail, because the plague was so terrible. Rev.16:17-21
The seventh bowl is the last plague. Yes? Where is Christ's return in this description?
peace
adam332 said:It's right here...and remember Revelation isn't the only passages that refer to the endtime quake, it is the only one that refers to it as a numbered vial.
Let's see what happened right before the last plague....
Rev. 16:15-16 BEHOLD, I COME as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.
John boldly proclaims his coming immediately before the quake...almost as if his presence caused it.
Just because you don't have a number doesn't mean you can't discern other prophecies which contain the same event.
Yep, the earthquake, lightnings, thunders, voices, and hail is simply Christ and his army stepping up to bat. So the prophetic accounts concur, but also does the symbolism.
.adam332 said:Genez, just because you post a verse and say this is the context and that is the timing, doesn't make it so
Just do one thing for me; contend with....
We know that we will judge during the millennium.
We know that we will sit on thrones during the millennium.
We know that we will be with Christ during the millennium.
Now show me ANY VERSES AT ALL, that are obviously after the second coming, and tell us that we will be judging, sitting on thrones, or with Christ here on earth at that time.
There aren't any!
adam332 said:I'm reading your post(s) and thinking I don't disagree with you.... so I looked back to see where we got our wires crossed.
Please note MY EMPHASIS...
In your last 3 statements you acknowledged it as coming from God. But, your first statement says "tribulation", which is not of God. Then later you indicate the church in will be around for tribulation.
I'm thinking you just mis-worded it here, yes?
sawdust said:John boldy proclaims the manner of Christ's coming not the timing. And this is partly why I personally believe in a pre-trib rapture for what "thief" announces he is about to break into your house?
And this is partly why I personally believe in a pre-trib rapture for what "thief" announces he is about to break into your house?
I have no idea what you mean.
I can agree with the above but that doesn't make the earthquake, lightnings, etc actually Christ but rather what precedes Him. ie the wrath of God the Father or His indignation (as in Nahum 1 verse). I can see Christ as the reason for the plagues but I fail to see how He is the plague itself and I hear you saying Christ is the plague. Maybe this in not exactly what you mean?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?