• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

bibletruth469

Joyful
Apr 14, 2013
787
63
Acworth ga
✟26,702.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

I agree with you about the rapture being kept a mystery until revealed to Paul . Yes, the tribulation is not meant for the church, but for the unbelieving Jews to come to a saving faith in The Lord Jesus Christ . Daniels 70 th week has yet to begin. It will begin with the confirming of the peace accord between the Jews and the antichrist. I believe that the rapture will take place before this time and then the wrath will begin.

Note: I think that you were referring to Manessiah instead of me with above post.
 
Upvote 0

bibletruth469

Joyful
Apr 14, 2013
787
63
Acworth ga
✟26,702.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

There is tribulation in people's daily lives . Yes, Christian believers are dying for their faith every day. This is very different than Daniels 70 th week and the great tribulation . No one will be able to escape and will run and hide for their lives. There will be worldwide calamities as no one has ever seen . Everyone in the world would die if the days were not cut short by Christ himself .

It is not just about a rapture to save us from bad times as you put it. The last 2000 plus years, we have been living in the church age. The rapture will happen whether people are ready or not. This is what the scripture teaches.
 
Upvote 0

TPeterY

But seek first the Kingdom of God....
Jan 16, 2014
803
136
✟1,583.00
Faith
Christian

Hi there,

I don't know if you noticed this but Matthew 24 points to a Pre-Trib rapture "twice" in Matt 24:31 and Matt 24:14.

Matthew 24:31 New King James Version (NKJV)
And He will send His angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they will gather together His elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.


The key word in Matt 24:31 is "heaven." Christ send His angels to gather His elects (FirstFruit of the Church) in heaven.

You can't rapture or resurrect anyone already in heaven. Even Mark 13:27 confirms the gathering of the FirstFruit of the church already raptured and waiting in heaven (in our individual chambers: Mansion - Isaiah 26:20) and the FirstFruit of Israel left on earth that must go through Jacob's trouble.

Matthew 24:14 New King James Version (NKJV)
And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in all the world as a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come.


Noticed how Matthew used the words "then the end will come" at verse 14? He's referring to the end for the church, which is before the tribulation. Notice Matthew starts talking about the tribulation at Matthew 24:15?

Now for those wondering why did Matthew skips 3.5 years into the AoD when that's at the middle of the tribulation, it's because Israel is at peace the first half of the tribulation and the church is gone. Therefore nothing needs to be written about the first 3.5 years.

1 Corinthians 15:24 New King James Version (NKJV)
Then comes the end, when He delivers the kingdom to God the Father, when He puts an end to all rule and all authority and power.


"THE END" in Matt 24:14 is the same as the one in 1st Cor 15:24, they both refer to the end in the chapter of the Church Age and the start of the tribulation.

The end for the church is at the beginning of the tribulation or you can call it Pre-Trib, it's not at the end of the tribulation. At the end of the tribulation is a time of deliverance for the 144,000 FirstFruit of Israel where Christ returns to save them from annihilation, not the church.

So in Matthew 24, there's two evidence of a Pre-Trib rapture, and a debunk of a Post-Trib rapture.

___________________________________

One other thing, there's a resurrection of the dead in Christ at the end of the tribulation of only those that died of beheading to the antichrist during the tribulation mentioned in Revelation 20:4. Only they get resurrected, there's no rapture, and no resurrection of the dead in Christ that ever lived before the tribulation.

Now if the rapture is at the end of the tribulation, why would there be a need for a resurrection at the end also. And why only those that died by beheading will get to live again and reign with Christ?

So from a post-trib viewpoint, the only way to live and reign with Christ while in the tribulation is to die to the Antichrist by beheading, not by natural disaster or nuclear annihilation.

And it doesn't do much good preparing yourself stocking up on canned goods and living in a bomb shelter in the tribulation because the bible said if you're in the tribulation, the only way to reign with Christ is to die by beheading.

I don't think this is God's planned is for the church.

Revelation 20:4 New Living Translation (NLT)
Then I saw thrones, and the people sitting on them had been given the authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their testimony about Jesus and for proclaiming the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or his statue, nor accepted his mark on their foreheads or their hands. They all came to life again, and they reigned with Christ for a thousand years.



Just something to think about.




.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

TPeterY

But seek first the Kingdom of God....
Jan 16, 2014
803
136
✟1,583.00
Faith
Christian

Nice write up Bibletruth. I'm shamefully embarrassed to say I've never read the books of Titus and Philemon before and just learned something new with Titus 2:13. Accurate too.

And you're always welcomes to use any material I've written. Same for everyone else too. I'm here to help find the truth.
 
Upvote 0

Manasseh_

not the evil king Manasseh
Dec 26, 2010
1,512
17
✟24,531.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Many can argue causes; a fool will argue with a petty mouth and bitter words because his cause is weak; a wise man will decide a cause because he can communicate without irony or sarcasm.


apparently my words are only bitter because I spoke the truth, I used no sarcasm or irony, no need to.........the simple fact remains as stated, your cause has no foundation at all from scripture, you have to assume pretrib into every verse you attempt to use..........the reasons are obvious , all anyone has to do is read the verses pretrib uses and see there are never any emphatic statements made regarding a pretrib gathering......
 
Upvote 0

Manasseh_

not the evil king Manasseh
Dec 26, 2010
1,512
17
✟24,531.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single


You conveniently skipped over verse 29 where Christ said the tribulation is already over , the events you mention happen after, not before just as Christ foretold in this prophecy.........just another among many attempts to inject pretrib into scripture
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
15,074
2,589
83
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟343,279.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Manasseh, I fully agree with your posts, the pre trib rapture proponent's must interpret scriptures to suit their belief. They assume something that simply is not there.
But what they fail to take note of is the many verses that say all will be tested:
Luke 21:35, Zephaniah 3:8, 1 Peter 4:12
 
Upvote 0

Danoh

Newbie
Oct 11, 2011
3,064
310
✟48,028.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
From the Mid-Acts Dispensational Perspective its not that the Rapture was kept a Mystery til Paul, rather, that it is part of the Mystery concerning a new creature: that church which is Christ's Body, comprising Jews and Gentiles - both saved in Uncircumcision - via his distinct, "my gospel... the gospel of the Uncircumcision... of gospel of the Grace of God in His goodness this side of His severity against Israel, in its all day gainsaying, or speaking against, the Holy Spirit's Early Acts continued ministry of the Lord's ministry to them in Matth. thru John, as to their gospel of the circumcision under the Law and their Covenants.

With their fall, God, was to have begun to have spoken to them in His wrath, per Daniel 9 in light of Leviticus 26, which is why Stephen saw Christ standing at the right hand of God, just after Israel, in Acts 7, commited the unpardonable sin they were warned against in Matt. 12:30-32.

He was standing because, per Isaiah 3:13, Israel was now headed towards Daniel's 70th week: God's wrath to come under the Law, Daniel 9; Lev. 26, upon that nation.

Instead, however, He turned from them in His wrath once more, in His severity, toward these vessels fitted for destruction, that, in His goodness He might show His mercy on those vessels of mercy then ready to receive His salvation but for Israel's obstinancy, Rom. 9-11.

Instead of allowing them to continue to head toward the day of His wrath under the Law, He concluded them blind to their Acts 3 gospel of the Circumcision, and sealed the election of that nation, "they of the Circumcision which believed," Acts 10:45, back when said gospel was in its last hours, God foreknowing Israel's filling its sins against Him and His Christ by their blasphemy against the Spirit.

Instead of allowing them to continue to head towards Daniel's 70th week, He turned from them in His wrath, just as Romans 1-3 asserts, and began to reveal "a Mystery," He had kept "hid in" Himself, Eph. 3:9, concerning a new creature, one day to reign as His Son's co-heir with Him, as His fulness, as that fulness by which He will one day fill those thrones, dominions, principalities in the Heavenlies with.

This church: the Body of Christ, began with Paul, after Israel's fall, saved as he was in Uncircumcision as Israel's chief blasphmer, unsaveable under the terms of their circumcision gospel: God saved him in His long suffering by His Grace, for a pattern of said longsuffering under Grace.

We have been delivered from the wrath to come because said wrath to come is per the Law, and we are neither under the Law, nor entered into its conditional wrath, as Israel did, per Leviticus 26, and midway through Daniel 9 reveals.

As a result of the above, 70 AD had no more to do with God, other thsn His having turned from Israel, anymore than 1948, as God put His Prophesied Plan and Purpose for Israel on hold, just before He saved Saul in his Uncircumcision and sent His Uncircumcision salvation to all without distinction, Acts 22; Rom. 3; Rom. 9-11.

As a result, whether Jew or Gentile, for God was now temporarily no longer dealing with people on the basis of Israel's distinction above all the nations of the Earth, one has to come to God through Paul's Uncircumcision gospel, Rom. 3.

In all this, the Body is not so much Pre-Trib, as Pre-Prophecy - pre- God's turning His attention one day to at last making a short work [7 years] upon this work, in righteousness - to finish the transgression for which He began Daniel's Seventy Weeks upon HIS people, to begin with, and by that, to make an end of their having filled up of their sins against Him, and all the rest of that... Daniel 9.

We consider "New Testament times," and all that, but not as men count God's timeline. Rather, as He does in His Word.

I swear we too often appear to be looking at these things, not from, "Nevertheless what saith the Scripture?" but from what saith the Scholars through their view of Scripture through the viewpoint of secular history made to teach God's Word.

Respectfully...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
we all believe in the bible here ? correct ?

if the scripture does not line up to our thinking maybe our theology is a little bit missing the mark where Christ wants us to be.....

1 cor 15 is the resurrection chapter in the bible !


I will start with some context ...

1 cor 15:22 For as in Adam all die[at different times], even so in Christ shall all be made alive. How and when are we made alive ?

1 cor 15:23 But every man in his own order: #1 Christ the firstfruits [firstfruits is plural! lets define it with scripture romans 8:23 states that we have the firstfruits of the spirit... which is very important Rev 4-5 which is before any judgements are poured out on earth ; afterward they that are Christ's at his[what coming? ...2nd! and to where ?on earth! Matt 25:33 sheep and goat judgement ] coming.



1 cor 15:24 Then cometh the end[Rev 20:11-15 judgement of the dead] , when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God[2 peter 3:10-12 ] , even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power

We can go to Heb 11 also to show another reason for a better salvation than all these people listed
 
Upvote 0
 
Upvote 0

bibletruth469

Joyful
Apr 14, 2013
787
63
Acworth ga
✟26,702.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Well, the first step in studying this very important issue is for one to realize that the rapture and the second coming are two distinct events . Yes, one must be a berean and especially pray for God to reveal His truth contained within the scripture . I really do not think that someone can simply take one verse and make a doctrine out of it. We must search the entire passages pertaining to the subject to find the answer. Also, a literal interpretation of the scripture is important for understanding the true meaning being conveyed within the various passages .

One example of a difference between the rapture and the second coming is explained below:

The rapture is the return of Christ in the air to remove all believers before wrath. The second coming is the return of Christ to the earth to bring the tribulation period to an end. There are many other examples of the differences between the 2 separate comings of Christ. I can list them, however a new thread needs to be started to show the differences .

I really have searched the scriptures and have found examples of a pretribulation rapture . I have yet to see your examples of the post tribulation rapture .
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Hi BT,

Unfortunately, there are many among the fellowship of 'christians' who have bought into this understanding that the passages that speak of God's wrath and the passages that speak of the tribulation are the same thing. I'm solidly convicted that they aren't, but you'll have to choose to study up on that if you want to know.

Here's the gist of it. The tribulation is the time of suffering pressed upon believers by the policies and practices of the Antichrist and all those that will follow after him, which according to the Scriptures will be just about everyone. The wrath of God is God's doing. It is His wrath that will be released upon the whole earth against those remaining after the rapture. It is my understanding that believers will be on the earth during the tribulation, but they won't be on the earth when God releases His wrath.

God bless you.
In Christ, Ted
 
Upvote 0

bibletruth469

Joyful
Apr 14, 2013
787
63
Acworth ga
✟26,702.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

I looked up these verses that you listed. How do these examples prove your point? I believe that The Lord wants us to study His word and search for truth. I personally believe that the rapture will happen before the tribulation . Other believers in Christ may believe that the rapture will happen after tribulation . Eschatology does not determine one's salvation. Only our belief in Christ and what He has done for us is what saves .
 
Upvote 0

Manasseh_

not the evil king Manasseh
Dec 26, 2010
1,512
17
✟24,531.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

the issue here is not defending post trib, the issue is regarding pretrib and the very shaky foundation on which it attempts to stand on, again stated as before, there is not one single verse /prophecy that directly says Christ returns before tribulation to gather his elect, each and every verse used by the pretrib camp is always the same, this doctrine has to be assumed into scripture, God says he can declare the end right from the beginning, something he has done, and he didn't do it based on assumption, conjecture and only suggesting that any verse says so..........never have understood why pretribbers can never see this great discrepancy with the few verses they always use to "prove" this doctrine to be true ???
 
Upvote 0

Danoh

Newbie
Oct 11, 2011
3,064
310
✟48,028.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I teach bible .... and God will judge the teacher with greater judgement

so I take it serious... and I take all verses in consideration in context

Right there is that distinction that greatly impacts all subsequent distinctions. See, its fine to believe one is studying and or teaching in context.

The real problem, though, is what each concludes the actual contexts supposedly is.

Acts Two Dispensationalism, for example, more or less originated the phrase, "Pre-Trib Rapture."

It did so from its conclusion that the Rapture would take place within the context of God's dealings with Israel, because it never fully severed itself from the Replacement Theology it arose in opposition to.

To this day, it begins its context within an Israelite Feast Day under the Law, which it then contends gave way to some psuedo Judeo-Christian faith.

As if those Messianic Believers at Pentecost were not Christian, in sense the of that word - of Christ as Savior.

The Rapture is not Pre-Trib. Rather, it is Pre-Prophecy. It is Pre-God's turning His attention once more to finishing up at last His Prophesied Purpose for Israel. He cleanses them to that through the Tribulation of His refiner's fire PER THE LAW.

The Body never was, nor is, under the Law. There is no Pre-Trib Deliverance for we are not under the Law it is based on


Neither is the Body some sort of hybrid born on an Israelite Feast Day, nor have we in any way, shape or form replaced what God, not began at Pentecost, as Acts Dispensationalism asserts, but began given Israel a foretaste of their world to come there.

All that greatly that greatly impacts one's eschatology, due to the resulting different "context" each group that comes along and "ignorant of this mystery" just lumps in this with that as if the mail, just because it is all found in the same room, is right off concluded as addressed to anyone who walks in there to claim it as His own.

Not M.A.D. at ya, brother, just food for thought
 
Upvote 0

bibletruth469

Joyful
Apr 14, 2013
787
63
Acworth ga
✟26,702.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

This is a very interesting perspective with a lot of depth in this post.
 
Upvote 0
We have not replace the Jews... we have the greatest salvation offered from God.... Heb 11and this is by grace as a gift eph 2 yet the point of acts 2 is the spirit indwelling by the Baptist of the spirit 1 cor 12:13 which was told of in acts 1:5which and entire new thing for believers .... did they understand or have all the information to live it out... no But God gave sign gifts till the bible was fulfilled Prophecy started in gen 3 so what are you talking about? Israel has not gone thru matt 24:21 which can be proven with history ... so till Romans 11:25-26 happens
The Body never was, nor is, under the Law. There is no Pre-Trib Deliverance for we are not under the Law it is based on
prophesy of Daniels 70th week I see you do not understand...
think about it
 
Upvote 0

Danoh

Newbie
Oct 11, 2011
3,064
310
✟48,028.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
B.I.C., if you're familiar with the history of Acts Dispenasationalism's Eschatology, it progressed from the distinction that passages like Matt. 24 taught a Pre-Trib Rapture, to no longer holding to that.

In this, it progressed in those finer distinctions these issues demand be studied out.

It has yet to progress from its continued assertion that the Body began on what that Apostle of the CIRCUMCISION - Israel - refers to as Israel's "last days," there in Acts 2.

Nor does it distinguish between Israel's baptism with the Spirit by Christ, Matt. 3, and the Body's baptism by the Spirit, 1 Cor. 12.

And those are just two of the many distinctions between things that Acts Two Dispensationalism is off on.

In fact, most of those Eschatological distinctions A2D makes to the Body are, when corrrect, Mid-Acts.

Gainsay it all you want, but, seeing as we will all appear before the Judgment Seat of Christ, you should at least receive it with all readiness of mind, searching the Scriptures daily whether those things are so, Acts 17:11.

Instead, you right off write it off because it doesn't fit your "context."

Brother, consider what I say, and the Lord give thee understanding...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0