This was not a guy in high school, this was someone with a higher education degree. I'm assuming at some point he sat in a class that explained the history of blackface and how hurtful it was to black people in the United States.
If he had robbed a liquor store at that age, should we equally say that it was just a less than wise decision? I assume that even if he learned his lesson and never did it again, people wouldn't be saying it should be overlooked.
As a citizen of Virginia who voted for this man, I want him to resign. I would not vote for him again.
I'm assuming at some point he sat in a class that explained the history of blackface and how hurtful it was to black people in the United States.
Comparing a liquor store robbery, which involves the threat of violence or force, or the use of view violence or force, towrds another person to take property, which is a crime, a felony, in all fifty states, to this photo, is asinine.
May be a false assumption, as I’ve never heard of any such class in my many years in the educational system, including undergrad and graduate school. Indeed, to my knowledge, no educational institution I attended offered any such class. Maybe he didn’t attend any school, college, or unvisity offering any such class.
And a great many of us have done something or said something that was reckless and in poor taste, many years ago. How many skeletons from your youth have you hidden? How many times have you seen someone who wasn’t Caucasian and had a racist thought about them, or experienced fear because of the color of their skin? How many times, being flippant, did you utter a racist slur or phrase? How many times did you cross to the other side of the street as a person who wasn’t Caucasian was walking on your side of the street in your direction?
You’ve offered a poor rebuttal to my position. Comparing the photo to felonious criminal conduct of robbery, referring to possibly nonexistent college class, isn’t a rebuttal.
The Roy thing happen not to long ago. As was about sexual assault. I believe. He's forgotten in my mind. As for Paula Dean. I assume some people have forgiven her by now. But liberals don't seem to be a forgiving group.How is Roy Moore not forgiven for merely having asked younger women on dates many years ago?
How is Paula Deen not forgiven for the use of a word that was commonplace in her state when she was a youth many years ago?
Didn't Jesse Jackson have an affair , that produced a kid. And Louis call for segregation. Then men are considered nothing to care about. They aren't really respected at all.How is it that Jesse Jackson and Louis Farrakhan ARE forgiven?
Double Standard
Wrong. I see from your age that you weren’t even born at that time. I was in my 30s. I can assure you that such behaviour was considered unacceptable...
Yes, it was long ago. The flap was recent, but the events themselves were long ago--just as in the Northam case.The Roy thing happen not to long ago.
No, it wasn't.As was about sexual assault.
The point was that, in some cases, they are.As for Paula Dean. I assume some people have forgiven her by now. But liberals don't seem to be a forgiving group.
You are telling me that these men are, or have been, politically insignificant??Didn't Jesse Jackson have an affair , that produced a kid. And Louis call for segregation. Then men are considered nothing to care about.
What's the line? That it's a crime? What's the cutoff age? Looks like it isn't 25. 30 maybe? I'm very willing to look at someone who's underage and give them the benefit of the doubt but this was an adult. I get that it isn't the same exactly, but I don't think anybody thought a KKK member and blackface was a good thing even in the 1980s. It was a very poor decision and him being a young 25 year old doesn't excuse it for me.
My US history classes covered the history of racism and included things like blackface. Perhaps I was just lucky.
I'd welcome someone to dig through the skeletons in my closet. I don't drink, I don't indulge in drugs, I'd rather stay home and play games than go out and my social media is pretty much blank. I was bullied so badly in school that I kept to myself and only talked to about four people the time I went. I've only been in relationships with two women, one is my wife and the other is a friend. I've never been accused of acting inappropriately toward anybody at work or in school.
Yes, I will freely admit that when confronted with a group of young black men, I've had the occasional spike of fear. Then I let my brain override that because I understand emotions are one of the worst ways to make decisions. I doubt they would have noticed anything.
"He was awkward and weird" is about what you'd come up with.
What's the line? That it's a crime? What's the cutoff age? Looks like it isn't 25. 30 maybe?
but I don't think anybody thought a KKK member and blackface was a good thing even in the 1980s.
It was a very poor decision and him being a young 25 year old doesn't excuse it for me.
Yes, I will freely admit that when confronted with a group of young black men, I've had the occasional spike of fear.
Then I let my brain override that because I understand emotions are one of the worst ways to make decisions. I doubt they would have noticed anything.
A fear based upon an irrational, racial stereotype. You should be tarred, feathered, and asked to resign from any job you currently hold. How dare you not be perfect.
You are attempting to mitigate the severity of your racially based stereotyped fear. So is Northam, except with Northam his conduct may not have been on account of any racism, just a poor decision drenched in racist insensitivity.
And, did you just try and argue that your fear based on a racial stereotype was okay since, well, no one knew about it, especially the blacks on the street?
Your bringing things up, that haven't been forgiven .By many liberal. Many forgotten by me. But I'm not going to keep these horrible grudges over people, like many liberals do.Yes, it was long ago. The flap was recent, but the events themselves were long ago--just as in the Northam case.
No, it wasn't.
The point was that, in some cases, they are.
You are telling me that these men are, or have been, politically insignificant??
I'm assuming at some point he sat in a class that explained the history of blackface and how hurtful it was to black people in the United States.
I don’t know that this was a deliberate omission. I’m not sure, when he decided to run for public office, he thought,”Quick, check my yearbooks for any potentially offensive material,” or that he should have. It’s not at all clear when he chose to run for public office that he even recalled the existence of this photo in any of his yearbooks. I can recall two pictures of all the pics in my yearbooks.
Now you are the one conflating things, I think. What someone feels like that is not necessarily within their control. What they do with those feelings is within their control. That initial stereotype fear never had me put on blackface.
I have trouble seeing due to what looks like static in my vision and get afraid if it's dark where I'm at because I cannot see my surroundings. I'm not choosing to be afraid of that. What I do with that, however, is what I consider important.The fear was in part based on their skin color. That is within your control. You can choose not be be afraid of people, even a group of them, on the basis of their skin color.
I still think he should resign.The point I’m making, however, is that you shouldn’t necessarily be subjected to the kind of reaction Northam is receiving, and neither should he.
I have trouble seeing due to what looks like static in my vision and get afraid if it's dark where I'm at because I cannot see my surroundings. I'm not choosing to be afraid of that. What I do with that, however, is what I consider important.
I still think he should resign.
You want to pat yourself on the back for merely having a fear of people based in part in race because you didn’t engage in conduct because of race? This ignores the fact that the fear is based in part on skin color, which is the problem, and you can’t mitigtae that by arguing other conduct is worse.
But I love your philosophy. Northam hires you as his PR guy to address the picture in the yearbook. You craftily tell the press that it was a picture in poor taste and racially insensitive, but since Northam’s actions aren’t as deplorable as being a member of the KKK, or espousing racist views, Northam should receive a reprieve from the demands he resign.
As I said, you do not want to be harshly treated for your fear of a group of guys who are black, at some point in the past, what you acknowledge was a problem, and neither should Northam for his poor exercise of prudent judgment.
What’s ironic is your reasons for Northam to face the political guillotine are applicable to you but you want to escape the same result, Mr. Maximilien Robespierre.