• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Radioactive dating

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Prove a same state past then. Your longstanding epic fail cries out to us all, and says.....flush....

There is no need. No one has offered any substantial evidence to the contrary. As has been pointed out so often the burden of proof is upon you since you claim there was a change. All we need to do is to point out that there is no evidence for a change and therefore no rational reason to believe in one.

dad failed again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JackRT
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It does tell us what forces acted on them. Deal with it.
Ratios tell us how much of various stuff there is not what it did.

You are assuming a different state past.
I assume God is right, but you need to pay cash.

So you complain that I don't use time, but soon as I do use time you will accuse me of making a circular argument. Do you see the problem here? You are complaining that I am not using a circular argument.
No complaints. I observe that you cannot support the dates and when you try it has to be inbred circular reasoning. Nothing else. How sweet it is.

If the K/T boundary was created 4500 years ago in a different state past, would the ratios marked by these red dots be consistent with what you would expect to see?
The ratios we see in real life are consistent.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
There is no need. No one has offered any substantial evidence to the contrary. As has been pointed out so often the burden of proof is upon you since you claim there was a change. All we need to do is to point out that there is no evidence for a change and therefore no rational reason to believe in one.

dad failed again.
Prove a same state past then. Your longstanding epic fail cries out to us all, and says.....flush....
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Prove a same state past then. Your longstanding epic fail cries out to us all, and says.....flush....
No need dad. You already failed. I did not fail since the evidence supports my views. All you have are misinterpretations of the Bible, in other words less than nothing.
It is nice to see that you like to be reminded how badly you failed.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Quoting out of context is dishonest. I have no fiction, that is your sin dad.
. Rather than fiction, it is crystal clear that your so called science godless pipe dream factory fables are true garbage through and through. You will need more than a grudge against creation and creator here, you would have needed fact and real knowledge and science. You failed.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Hey dad, if we assume a different state past, is it unreasonable to accept Last Thursdayism?
Yes. The days of Genesis were not last week any more than the days of the new earth are next week. Elementary.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No need....
Rather than spam hate posts and intellectual graffiti, and attempt to derail the thread, you should face the wonderful facts here. Rejoice in the real fail of science with us.
 
Upvote 0

The Cadet

SO COOL
Apr 29, 2010
6,290
4,743
Munich
✟60,617.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Yes. The days of Genesis were not last week any more than the days of the new earth are next week. Elementary.

But wait, if we accept that there was a different past state, couldn't that mean that the bible didn't actually come from God? After all, even if all the evidence we have right now indicates that the bible was divinely inspired, that past state may have been greatly different!
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
. Rather than fiction, it is crystal clear that your so called science godless pipe dream factory fables are true garbage through and through. You will need more than a grudge against creation and creator here, you would have needed fact and real knowledge and science. You failed.
Then why is your very life dependent upon the science that I accept and that you reject? What are you doing here using this science to merely communicate here.

dad shoots himself in the foot again.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
But wait, if we accept that there was a different past state, couldn't that mean that the bible didn't actually come from God? After all, even if all the evidence we have right now indicates that the bible was divinely inspired, that past state may have been greatly different!
No. The bible is here now and forever, and will not change when the earth and stars change.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Rather than spam hate posts and intellectual graffiti, and attempt to derail the thread, you should face the wonderful facts here. Rejoice in the real fail of science with us.
Again, it is dishonest to quote out of context. And I make no spam or hate posts. When people ask for evidence or it is needed I am more than happy to provide it. The problem is that your response are so weak that none is needed to refute your weak attacks. You can't show a fail of science. All you can do is to show a failure of dad.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Every time you disagree with Jesus that the Scripture is of God and which He came to fulfill, you badmouth the Almighty.

Pointing out errors in the Bible is not disagreeing with Jesus or God. As you know you failed to show that the Bible is the "word of God" and the Bible's countless errors makes such a claim blasphemy on your part. You are at best simply misinterpreting the Bible. No one here is trying to badmouth the Almighty except for the creationists.

You try to tell your God how he made the Earth instead of looking at the evidence that your God left for you. The evidence says that there was no Garden of Eden, no Flood. Why are you badmouthing God by calling him a liar?
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
But wait, if we accept that there was a different past state, couldn't that mean that the bible didn't actually come from God? After all, even if all the evidence we have right now indicates that the bible was divinely inspired, that past state may have been greatly different!
It is not grown up to pretend that God changing some laws of nature in the past or future at some point means that either He doesn't exist or His word would not still be perfect.
 
Upvote 0