![[serious]](/data/avatars/m/160/160873.jpg?1431539545){kind=avatar}
The issue is not whether present day memories could be extrapolated into last week existing, and yield results! The issue is what we know about the state of lat week.
That doesn't seem reasonable, does it?
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Radioactive dating
- Thread starter dad
- Start date
That doesn't seem reasonable, does it?
Name one modern mammal species found under the K/T boundary. Show me a single fossil of a human being found below the K/T boundary.
Evidence please.
Why?
Would an Ar/K ratio of 0.5 and a Pb/U ratio of 0.1 qualify as "some isotopic signature"?
I see that you can't refute the simple fact that the isotope ratios are exactly what we should see with a same state past.
Yes, that is the issue. If the evidence is consistent with a same state past, then it is evidence for a same state past. That's how evidence works.
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Most life apparently could not leave remains such as fossils. If you look for that you grope blindly in the dark.
Because water shooting up from possibly as deep as the core of earth likely would result in great pressure exiting the surface!
Upvote
0
We can find remains of modern mammals above the K/T boundary. Why not below the K/T boundary?
Why would that put specific ratios of Ar/K into the tektites?
Upvote
0
Still waiting for an answer to this question:
Would an Ar/K ratio of 0.5 and a Pb/U ratio of 0.1 qualify as "some isotopic signature"?
Would an Ar/K ratio of 0.5 and a Pb/U ratio of 0.1 qualify as "some isotopic signature"?
Upvote
0
Astrophile
Newbie
- Aug 30, 2013
- 2,338
- 1,559
- 78
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Widowed
So why do we find fossil dinosaurs, plesiosaurs, ichythosaurs and mammal-like reptiles below the K-T boundary?
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Some creatures apparently could fossilize. Those are what the fossil record consist of. For man, and other kinds of creatures, the general rule was basically, as god put it....from dust you came, to dust you will return..
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
the isotopes in the real world do have sigs. Your personal dream isotopes don't matter.
Upvote
0
Still waiting for an answer to this question:
Would an Ar/K ratio of 0.5 and a Pb/U ratio of 0.1 qualify as "some isotopic signature"?
It is a simple yes/no.
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
If Adam went to dust fast, praytell, how would you expect him to fossilize???
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Ratios are known to change as we go back in time, for example in layers. The layers of your dreams just don't matter.
Upvote
0
Still waiting for an answer to this question:
Would an Ar/K ratio of 0.5 and a Pb/U ratio of 0.1 qualify as "some isotopic signature"?
It is a simple yes/no.
Upvote
0
Sorry, that's just crazy. You would, by your interpretation, make God a liar after the present state was formed, because man no longer goes inevitably to dust, now leaving behind bones, etc.
You even sacrifice God's integrity to maintain your "different state" views!
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
No idea what you are babbling about. Try to be topical, or interesting rather than parroting and silly.
The issue with isotopes and the nature of the past is whether the ratios also changed in the former state. The evidence suggests they did.
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
If God said dust to dust for Adam, and then Adam fossilized, that would be the problem. Focus.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
No!
In cases where descendants are included, it is usually obvious. Such as for Abraham being father of many nations, or the curse of Adam and Eve, etc
Upvote
0
Similar threads
