sentipente
Senior Contributor
- Jul 17, 2007
- 11,651
- 4,492
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Politics
- US-Others
Why didn't you ask freeindeed in PM?I can't speak on behalf of MVA, you'll have to ask him, perhaps in PM?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why didn't you ask freeindeed in PM?I can't speak on behalf of MVA, you'll have to ask him, perhaps in PM?
lol.... you mean like you assume the worst of me?You guys sure like to assume the worst of this sister.
I'm just not sure why.
I DID PM Free.![]()
We are not but I am glad you are getting a sense of what it feels like when people assume the worst of you.You guys sure like to assume the worst of this sister.
Thanks for that.I don't mind Free posting comments. I've talked with him at length before and he's a VERY nice person.
I was not commenting about anyone individually. I made an observation about the thread in general. There is no end in discussion, even among current SDA's, as to exactly how they should 'keep' the Sabbath. It always seems to arrive at a discussion of legalism. I believe that if you take an honest look, this thread is not about lifting up Christ. It is about what's 'legal' to 'do' on Sabbath and what is not.I do have a problem with him saying we aren't uplifting Christ when Christ Himself told us to obey the commandments.
I'm a Christian, sold out to Christ alone, who used to be an SDA pastor. I made an observation that this discussion has moved away from lifting up Christ. I am assuming that those participating in this discussion as fellow Christians (body of Christ) would rather see the discussion be about him rather than continuing down a path of legalism. Maybe I'm wrong. I've been wrong before and have no problem admitting it.He's ex-Adventist so he knows exactly how we feel about Sabbath, and he's made it abundantly clear that he doesn't agree already...to the point of ignoring any forum rules we have set up.
Sorry. Not trying to make a stink. Just hoping something positive can come of this.I just don't get it.
lol.... you mean like you assume the worst of me?
It was not about assuming as much as it was my commenting on your reaction which I did not understand....
thanks for dropping back in and clarifying a few things.... always a pleasure to discuss topics with people willing to do so.... as far as I am concerned there was no stink.... but that's just me....Thanks for that.
I was not commenting about anyone individually. I made an observation about the thread in general. There is no end in discussion, even among current SDA's, as to exactly how they should 'keep' the Sabbath. It always seems to arrive at a discussion of legalism. I believe that if you take an honest look, this thread is not about lifting up Christ. It is about what's 'legal' to 'do' on Sabbath and what is not.
I'm a Christian, sold out to Christ alone, who used to be an SDA pastor. I made an observation that this discussion has moved away from lifting up Christ. I am assuming that those participating in this discussion as fellow Christians (body of Christ) would rather see the discussion be about him rather than continuing down a path of legalism. Maybe I'm wrong. I've been wrong before and have no problem admitting it.
I did nothing to cut on the Sabbath.
Sorry. Not trying to make a stink. Just hoping something positive can come of this.
In Christ alone,
All he said was that the vultures are watching. That's a figure of speech. He did not call anyone a vulture. Should we get upset when DJ says "who is the filty-rotten liar who said . . .?" (Maybe if he says it too often).I also don't see condoning comparing anyone a vulture.
Why should he explain something that only you are trying to make an issue of? I did not see him in a negative light because of the comment.I think the comment reflects poorly on you BUT I really would like to give you a chance to explain.
I sent you a PM on this.Thanks for the answer Free.
I still would like to know who you were referring to as a vultures? People that report posts? Or moderators? Who?
I think the comment reflects poorly on you BUT I really would like to give you a chance to explain.
Just as I thought.I assure you the word 'vultures' was a figure of speach and not directed at any individual
I sent you a PM on this.
However, I would like to publically apologize to anyone who took offense at my comment. NO INDIVIDUAL was in mind when it was made and NO personal offense was intended. I know full-well that I am now considered to be an outsider and that any observation I might make is scrutinized to a higher degree than if I had just shut up and stayed SDA, but I assure you the word 'vultures' was a figure of speach and not directed at any individual and certainly not at the moderators.
God bless, and may Chirst alone be lifted up, for he alone is worthy!
you are not alone....lolI know full-well that I am now considered to be an outsider and that any observation I might make is scrutinized to a higher degree than if I had just shut up and stayed SDA,.....
Now, I suspect the mods will side with the person (wink) who reported him for posting where he does not belong.you are not alone....lol
aint life grand......Now, I suspect the mods will side with the person (wink) who reported him for posting where he does not belong.
In Christ ALONE, yes! It's the best! Aside from that, it's disappointing, at best.aint life grand......
how about this one....
John 5:15-18 The man left and told the leaders that Jesus was the one who had healed him. (16) They started making a lot of trouble for Jesus because he did things like this on the Sabbath. (17) But Jesus said, "My Father has never stopped working, and that is why I keep on working." (18) Now the leaders wanted to kill Jesus for two reasons. First, he had broken the law of the Sabbath. But even worse, he had said that God was his Father, which made him equal with God.
So if God works on the sabbath, and Jesus worked on the sabbath, and Jesus is the example as some here have suggested, then the moderators should work on the sabbath....