• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Questions on the extent of God’s sovereignty.

John Mullally

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2020
2,463
857
Califormia
✟146,819.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
I said He acts mostly in a positive fashion. In fact, I’d argued it’s all positive because everything is for His glory, and He won’t let anything interfere with His glory.
1 John 4:8 and 1 John 4:16 say that God is love. 1 Corinthians 13 describes love and it not self-seeking.

1 Corinthians 13:4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.​
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bling
Upvote 0

William Lefranc

Active Member
Aug 4, 2019
140
34
54
Wyoming
✟29,533.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I think we can all agree that God is sovereign. This thread is meant to try to explore the extent of His sovereignty. So to start, I pose these questions.

Does God know every action man might freely choose? If so, can He let man do that action if it suits His purpose? Also, can He intervene to prevent man from performing that action?
Man has free reign to do his own will, but in the end, God will accomplish His good will regardless of how (unredeemed) man finished his race. If he chooses to bow to Messiah and obey him, he will be walking in love and grace, and his joy will be full in the end.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,057
57
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,962,858.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
1 John 4:8 and 1 John 4:16 say that God is love. 1 Corinthians 13 describes love and it not self-seeking.

1 Corinthians 13:4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.​
How does this relate to my post?
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,057
57
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,962,858.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Man has free rein to do his own will, but in the end, God will accomplish His good will regardless of how (unredeemed) man finished his race. If he chooses to bow to Messiah and obey him, he will be walking in love and grace, and his joy will be full in the end.
Are you saying that God doesn’t intervene in the affairs of men?
 
Upvote 0

John Mullally

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2020
2,463
857
Califormia
✟146,819.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
I said He acts mostly in a positive fashion. In fact, I’d argued it’s all positive because everything is for His glory, and He won’t let anything interfere with His glory.
1 John 4:8 and 1 John 4:16 say that God is love. 1 Corinthians 13 describes love and it not self-seeking.

1 Corinthians 13:4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.​
How does this relate to my post?
It relates to Post 107. If we believe that God's highest motive is to receive greater glory for himself, then God is almost unknowable as no one knows what gives God the greatest glory. But that is not God's highest motive because God is love and love is not self-seeking.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,057
57
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,962,858.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
It relates to Post 107. If we believe that God's highest motive is to receive greater glory for himself, then God is almost unknowable as no one knows what gives God the greatest glory. But that is not God's highest motive because God is love and love is not self-seeking.
What you are implying is that there’s something greater than God’s glory. Maybe free will, perhaps?
 
Upvote 0

John Mullally

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2020
2,463
857
Califormia
✟146,819.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
What you are implying is that there’s something greater than God’s glory. Maybe free will, perhaps?
God’s greatest glory is manifested in His own selflessness. God does not selfishly sacrifice creation for the sake of His own glory, but instead He selflessly sacrifices Himself for sake of His creation, which in turn reveals Him as the most glorious of all. It is the selfless motive of Christ’s sacrifice that brings Him so much glory. To in anyway undermine the selflessness of the Divine motive actually undermines the very thing that makes His grace so glorious.

1 Timothy 4:10 That is why we labor and strive, because we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all people, and especially of those who believe.​

Jesus described the greatest commandment at Matthew 22:37-40: “And He said to him, ‘“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.” This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.’” So, the purpose of the world is to glorify God by reciprocating His love, and to effect the same in others, by showing them God’s love so that they would love God in return.

Non-Calvinists believe that God created humanity with the purpose and intention of having a relationship, in which freewill makes relationships truly possible, insomuch that free-will is necessary for there to be genuine worship and reciprocated love. In other words, God is most glorified by His love and provision for all people, with real relationships among real people who are not puppets who are irresistibly forced to do anything.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,057
57
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,962,858.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
God’s greatest glory is manifested in His own selflessness. God does not selfishly sacrifice creation for the sake of His own glory, but instead He selflessly sacrifices Himself for sake of His creation, which in turn reveals Him as the most glorious of all. It is the selfless motive of Christ’s sacrifice that brings Him so much glory. To in anyway undermine the selflessness of the Divine motive actually undermines the very thing that makes His grace so glorious.

1 Timothy 4:10 That is why we labor and strive, because we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all people, and especially of those who believe.​

Jesus described the greatest commandment at Matthew 22:37-40: “And He said to him, ‘“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.” This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.’” So, the purpose of the world is to glorify God by reciprocating His love, and to effect the same in others, by showing them God’s love so that they would love God in return.

Non-Calvinists believe that God created humanity with the purpose and intention of having a relationship, in which freewill makes relationships truly possible, insomuch that free-will is necessary for there to be genuine worship and reciprocated love. In other words, God is most glorified by His love and provision for all people, with real relationships among real people who are not puppets who are irresistibly forced to do anything

I was going to respond, but we’ve gone off topic.

Still waiting for you to address the OP, though.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,831
1,928
✟1,005,358.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I said He acts mostly in a positive fashion. In fact, I’d argued it’s all positive because everything is for His glory, and He won’t let anything interfere with His glory.
I questioned you “most” with: When are you seeing God not "act in a positive fashion"?

We agree everything God does is for His glory, but you say, “everything is for His glory”, so can human do stuff which does not bring glory to God?

The father in the prodigal son story was always glorious, but did the prodigal son bring glory to his father while in the foreign land?
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,831
1,928
✟1,005,358.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
This seems like a bit of a Pollyannaish perspective to me. It's kind of like the game we play with prayer: Your prayer seems to have been quickly and directly answered: Praise God! Precisely the opposite of what you prayed for occurs: Oh, sorry, your prayer apparently wasn't in accord with God's will. Absolutely nothing remotely related to your prayer occurs: Oh, well, God doesn't always answer immediately - wait a year or 50.

Voila, every prayer is "answered" - even if it may not look that way much of the time.

Ditto with the notion the "bad stuff which seems to happen helps some willing individuals." Is that how we look at the Holocaust? Is that how we look at Pompeii or other natural disasters? Sure, I suppose I could articulate some "opportunities" that flowed from the ghastly deaths of six million Jewish men, women and children and five million prisoners of war - but doesn't that seem ABSURD in the context of any theology that deserves to be called Christian?

I recently happen to have done a great deal of reading of scholarly books dealing with the Problem of Evil. Yes, the consensus is that evil is not a defeater for Christian or theistic belief. Nevertheless, the consensus is also that there is no theodicy that really provides a satisfactory answer to the problem. That's pretty much the message of the Book of Job - we have to trust because we are NOT going to fathom God's ways. We are not going to "explain" God by any attempt at rational analysis.

GOD IS SOVEREIGN: That's what we need to know. "Exploring" His sovereignty, in my opinion, is pointless. However it all works, we all know (with the possible exception of hardline Calvinists, who live on some other theological planet) that we have enough free will to be accountable to God for how we exercise it.
Thank you for replying.

Sometimes reading the Bible, thinking about it and trying to allow the Spirit to communicate with you is better than reading scholarly works.

Unless Christ comes in our life time we will die, but is death in and of itself “bad”?

Is death not the way good people get to go home and bad people quit doing bad stuff?

This messed up world with all its problems seems to be the very best place for willing individuals to fulfill their earthly objective, so is this world a good or bad place?
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,057
57
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,962,858.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
I questioned you “most” with: When are you seeing God not "act in a positive fashion"?

We agree everything God does is for His glory, but you say, “everything is for His glory”, so can human do stuff which does not bring glory to God?

The father in the prodigal son story was always glorious, but did the prodigal son bring glory to his father while in the foreign land?
Wrong question. The question is was God glorified in that situation? Yes, He was.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,831
1,928
✟1,005,358.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Wrong question. The question is was God glorified in that situation? Yes, He was.
The father in the prodigal son story is glorious for His Love for His sons, no matter if the young son returns or does not return and if the older son goes to the party or does not go (the father went out to them).

The question remains: “Can human do stuff which does not bring glory to God?”

People can bring dishonor to God/Christ:

Psalms 106: 19 They made a calf in Horeb

and worshiped a molten image.

20 They exchanged the glory of God

for the image of an ox that eats grass.

John 8:49

Jesus answered, “I have not a demon; but I honor my Father, and you dishonor me.

Romans 2:23

You who boast in the law, do you dishonor God by breaking the law?
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,057
57
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,962,858.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
The father in the prodigal son story is glorious for His Love for His sons, no matter if the young son returns or does not return and if the older son goes to the party or does not go (the father went out to them).
The problem with using that parable is that it’s not elastic, being able to be stretched every which way. I’m hoping you don’t think God isn’t omniscient, like the father in the parable.
The question remains: “Can human do stuff which does not bring glory to God?”
Of course. Can they do that without God letting them? Of course not.
People can bring dishonor to God/Christ:

Psalms 106: 19 They made a calf in Horeb

and worshiped a molten image.

20 They exchanged the glory of God

for the image of an ox that eats grass.

John 8:49

Jesus answered, “I have not a demon; but I honor my Father, and you dishonor me.

Romans 2:23

You who boast in the law, do you dishonor God by breaking the law?

Right. God creates some vessels for dishonor to bring Him glory.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,057
57
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,962,858.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Unless you're a Calvinist, of course. Then, those millions who died in the Holocaust simply weren't among the elect.
Did God treat any holocaust victims unfairly?
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,057
57
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,962,858.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
As I suggested in my previous dialogue with you, I believe God allowed demonic influence to do its work and human evil to operate unrestrained. There are innumerable ways in which God could have prevented or greatly minimized what became the Holocaust. He chose not to do so, which presents a challenge to the notion of an omnipotent, omnibenevolent God whose very nature is Love. Was the Holocaust consistent with such a God? By every human standard: No, it was entirely inconsistent. To cling to a non-deterministic Christian theology, one must pretty much throw up one's hands and say, "We can only trust that God is who we believe Him to be and that the Holocaust somehow makes sense from the divine perspective." From a Calvinistic perspective, there is no inconsistency because those who suffered and died were not among the elect but were vessels of wrath prepared for destruction. As all non-Calvinist theologians argue, this is a very curious idea of an omnipotent, omnibenevolent God whose very nature is Love. Even if I were a Calvinist, I think I would have a very difficult time seeing God's glory in the Holocaust.
First off, you act as if scripture doesn’t talk about vessels of wrath prepared for destruction. You act as if it’s some sort of Calvinist mantra devised in Geneva as opposed to coming from scripture.

Second, at least you admit that God could have stopped the Holocaust. What I don’t understand is this idea of God being omnibenevolent. Scripture talks about God hating. It talks about His wrath against those who do evil.

From, for lack of a better term, an emotional standpoint, the Holocaust was horrific. What was done to the Jews is beyond words. But from a biblical point of view, what God did was just because every single Jew that was killed was a sinner who deserved death. There’s no other way to look at that. God could have stopped it. But even though we may not be able to grasp it, it was for His glory.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,831
1,928
✟1,005,358.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The problem with using that parable is that it’s not elastic, being able to be stretched every which way. I’m hoping you don’t think God isn’t omniscient, like the father in the parable.
Any good wonderful intelligent father would know what his young rebellious unwise son would do with his inheritance.

The question is not the day and time of the young son’s return, but the father is waiting and watch in Love for the son.

Like with the father going out and asking the older son to please join the party with the young son, God working through Christians having us going out asking others to join the party (the elect), which is left to them to make the choice. There are reasons for not joining and reason to join, so it is their autonomous free will choice. God knowing which choice the person made, but the question must be asked and the answer given.
Of course. Can they do that without God letting them? Of course not.
God “letting them” allows both the right and wrong choice to be their free will choice, they can be accountable for making that choice.
Right. God creates some vessels for dishonor to bring Him glory.
This one verse is taken out of context using an old translation: (KJV) Ro. 9: 21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

A better translation would be: (NIV) Ro 9:21 Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special (τιμὴν in Greek) purposes and some for common (ἀτιμίαν; in the Greek) use?

The reason for translating (τιμὴν) special purpose and (ἀτιμίαv) common purpose is: first because they can have those meanings and second because Paul uses these same Greek words in a similar analogy:

2 Tim. 2: 20 In a large house there are articles not only of gold and silver, but also of wood and clay; some are for special purposes (τιμὴν in Greek) and some for common use (ἀτιμίαν; in the Greek). 21 Those who cleanse themselves from the latter will be instruments for special purposes, made holy, useful to the Master and prepared to do any good work.

From Tim. 2:20 and knowing a rich person has things that are common (like water jugs) but would not have items of dishonor in his house the meaning is obvious?

Even more importantly here, Paul says: “Those who cleanse themselves from the latter will be instruments for special purposes (honor), made holy… So can a common (dishonorable) vessel become special (honorable)? Does this individual described as being “common” have to do something or does God only do it?

Romans chapter 9 takes lots of explanation, thinking, other verses, understanding of the context and time, so you cannot just take a verse out of context.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,831
1,928
✟1,005,358.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Sometimes, yes. Often, no. The Problem of Evil has been and remains one of the greatest philosophical and theological challenges to the Christian belief in an omnipotent, omnibenevolent God. You seem to be suggesting that scholarship is inherently suspect, as though great scholars don't read and think the about the Bible and allow the Holy Spirit to inform their work. Of course, they do. In books like God and the Problem of Evil: Five Views, Amazon.com, non-Calvinist Christian scholars of the highest caliber wrestle with this issue. Why would I or any Christian not take advantage of a resource like this to help inform our own Bible reading and reflection?
Do you see death as being bad in and of itself?

Lots of innocent people have been killed in all wars and genocides, so is the Holocaust that much different?

Here are some questions to get you thinking:



1. Was Job spiritually more mature at the end of Job’s story than at the beginning?

2. What problem did Job finally show that he needed correction?

3. Would Job have easily acknowledged this problem prior to the disaster, because he would have realized he had a problem?

4. Would God have known of Job’s problem prior to satan’s visit?

5. Did satan manipulate God to get at Job or did God manipulate satan to get satan to do stuff God could not do (hurt innocent people) and bring Job to the point of accepting God’s understanding of his problem?

6. Does this give us an example of the degree to which God will go in order to help us to grow spiritually?

7. Is this an example of the role satan plays indirectly helping good people become even better?

Is God manipulating satan did have satan do what God will not do directly?

8. It is “unfortunate” that some of Jobs children went to be with God in heaven and leave Job and his wife, but how big of a price will God pay to help us (send his only son)?



Look at this at least:



Job, He was the greatest man among all the people of the East.



1. This is the oldest story thought to be recorded, it could be before the time of the flood.

2. First!! Remember our objective: All humans are to develop and grow in Godly type love (agape) of God and other humans.

3. God’s objective is the most selfless, in that He has and will do everything to help human individually develop and grow Godly type love (help us fulfill our objective).

4. In the story of Job, we can see God is in charge, satan can only do what God allows Satan to do.

5. God has power over Satan and could destroy Satan at any time, so Satan has a purpose that forces God to allow Satan to stick around.

6. From the story we see Satan doing the bad stuff to good people and God allowing Satan to do this bad stuff.

7. Bad stuff is never bad for the individual that loves God: Rm8: 28And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him. What good can Job get out of this discipline, trial, learning experience?

8. Job would have been praying for himself like he prayed for his kids: Early in the morning he would sacrifice a burnt offering for each of them, thinking, "Perhaps my children have sinned and cursed God in their hearts." This was Job's regular custom. Job’s pray would easily been to ask to love more and grow spiritually.

9. We can not stop, we have to be growing or we will start withering spiritually. Where Job is in his spiritual growth at the beginning seem to be far down the path so further growing could be a challenge and require a new level.

10. Job is fantastic at the beginning of the story, but he is not perfect, he can still do a lot of growing.

11. I think we can agree that Job is personally a better person (spiritually stronger) at the end of the story then at the beginning, so what was Job’s weakness in the beginning that God would know and realize? If we could figure this out we could figure what was needed to help Job. Would a burning bush experience help Job?

12. This is another situation in which God works with an individual personally. God is working with each of us very similarly.

13. We do not know how God worked individually with each of Job’s kids, but He was and they joined God in heaven and would be there when Job got there.

14. It has been my experience people (including myself) really hate to humble ourselves. It is like being baptized, people use every excuse for not being baptized that comes down to being a sign of humility they will not do.





At the end we see a changed Job:



1 Then Job replied to the LORD :

2 "I know that you can do all things;

no plan of yours can be thwarted.

3 You asked, 'Who is this that obscures my counsel without knowledge?'

Surely I spoke of things I did not understand,

things too wonderful for me to know.

4 "You said, 'Listen now, and I will speak;

I will question you,

and you shall answer me.'

5 My ears had heard of you

but now my eyes have seen you.

6 Therefore I despise myself

and repent in dust and ashes."

The fact Job talks of “repenting”, means he realized he sinned, so what was Job’s sin?

Here seems to be the problem: Job 31: 35 (“Oh, that I had someone to hear me! I sign now my defense—let the Almighty answer me; let my accuser put his indictment in writing. 36 Surely I would wear it on my shoulder, I would put it on like a crown. 37 I would give him an account of my every step; I would present it to him as to a ruler.)—

From this and previous verses Job has lower God to his level like he could argue his case before God and win. Job would not have admitted that deep in his heart early on he saw God as being like some superior human being and not above making any mistakes, so it would take a huge upheaval in Job’s life to get him to realize this weakness in himself.



Job was humbled in the end, but why go through all this would there not be an easier way? If God had spoken directly to Job prior to all this would Job not have listened? I would say, “NO”. Job would have said, I know Lord (when he really didn’t) Job would not have said what he did say in the end and that is what he needed to say. How do you get Job to say what he did without going through what he experienced? If you had asked Job in the beginning, “do you know the Lord”, he would have said, “yes” for he knew the Lord better then anyone else at the time. God does not want you to just be the best, but the best you can be and that is what Job wanted.

Just some thoughts, I really love Job and thank God for this story.
Has the Holy Spirit communicated to you a clear understanding of how events such as the Holocaust, in which millions of Jews and non-Jews suffered utterly ghastly deaths and were deprived of any further opportunity for salvation, are consistent with an omnipotent, omnibenevolent God? He hasn't to me. Perhaps you have an understanding of an issue that has confounded virtually everyone who has attempted to tackle it. My only answer is the one suggested in the Book of Job: something like the Holocaust simply cannot be explained from the human perspective, and we can only trust that one day we will understand how it is consistent with God as we believe Him to be.

Well, yes, death was bad for the millions of Holocaust victims who died in an unsaved state. Bad people not only quit doing bad stuff, but death deprives them of any opportunity to repent. An omnipotent, omnibenevolent God was willing to allow the evil of the Holocaust to bring a ghastly end to the lives of millions of people, most of them among His covenantal chosen people, thereby depriving them of any further opportunity for salvation, because ... ??? This is the Problem of Evil, and it has no easy answer.

Unless you're a Calvinist, of course. Then, those millions who died in the Holocaust simply weren't among the elect. They were vessels of wrath prepared for (ghastly) destruction, all to the glory of God! This is the glorious, omnipotent, omnibenevolent God of Calvinism, who strikes most people including me as not very glorious or benevolent. Sovereign, yes, but not exactly glorious or benevolent.

My quest over the past 50+ years, has been to get as close to the truth of Christianity as I am able in this lifetime. That's my "earthly objective." I am willing to consider any resource that my assist me. On many issues, however, I am forced to concede that no answer is entirely satisfactory from a human perspective and to trust that one day we will see how the real answer is consistent with the omnipotent, omnibenevolent God in whom we believe.
I like your heart and concern for others.

I do not believe in the doctrine of “original sin”, so I believe people are innocent and in a “safe” condition until they reach adult maturity and sin themselves. If they die in their innocence they would go to heaven, but would not have fulfilled their earthly objective thus lacking Godly type Love and having only a wonderful child for parent type love.

Everything needs to start with the objective.

The differences and issues begin with misunderstanding of the objective. Most Christians like: Man’s objective is to “bring glory to God” and have scripture references to support that objective, but a person can take any commandment or direction of God given in scripture and have Biblical support for call that command: “Man’s Objective”. We are certainly commanded to do that command, so why is it not man’s objective?

There are the two superior commands which all other commands are subordinate to and combined would be like: “Love God (and secondly others) with all your heart, soul, mind, and energy.” That appears to be man’s “Mission Statement”. The huge problem with fulfilling that “Mission Statement” is the fact that the “Love” needed would have to be huge, way beyond anything man could develop, learn, deserve, earn, pay back, be instinctive to man, or somehow just be forced upon humans.

Thus, the reason you have free will, is because it is required for you to complete your earthly objective.

This messed up world which includes satan roaming around is not here for your pleasure, but to help each of us to become like God Himself in that you have the unique, unbelievable Godly type Love (God himself is Love).

There are just somethings even an all-powerful Creator cannot do (there are things impossible to do), like create another Christ, since Christ has always existed, the big impossibility for us is; create humans with instinctive Godly type Love, since Godly type Love is not instinctive. Godly type love has to be the result of a free will decision by the being, to make it the person’s Love apart from God. In other words: If the Love was in a human from the human’s creation it would be a robotic type love and not a Godly type Love. Also, if God “forces” this Love on a person (Kind a like a shotgun wedding) it would not be “loving” on God’s part and the love forced on the person would not be Godly type Love. This Love has to be the result of a free will moral choice with real alternatives (for humans those alternatives include the perceived pleasures of sin for a season.)

Read the story of the Prodigal Son in Luke 15, the young son was generously given more then he could handle (like most of us today), which the father would realize. The prodigal son returned to his father, not out of “Love”, but selfishly wanting a job he did not deserve or should even ask for. Just because the son became just willing to accept pure undeserved charity from the father he hated, allowed the father to shower him with gifts. God is that way with you.

God has created beings to shower them with the greatest gifts possible, the greatest gift being having a Love like His.

If there is this Creator of the universe out there, His “creations” could not really “do” anything for Him, so this Creator would have to be seen as a Giver (Unselfish Lover) and not trying to “get” something from His creation.

Why would God have a totally unselfish type of Love, since He personally would not get anything out of it? If God’s “Love” is some kind of knee jerk reaction, then it is really meaningless (something like; gravity which is nice to have, but everyone automatically has it). God Loves us in spite of what we have done, who we are or what we will do, so it has to be by His choice.

God would create the right universe for the sake of the individuals that will accept His gift (the most powerful force [Love] in all universes, since that force [Love] compels even God to do all He does) and thus the willing become like He is (the greatest gift He could give).

What keeps the all-powerful Creator from just giving whatever He wants to his creation, eliminating the need for free will and this earthly time.

This Love is way beyond anything humans could develop, obtain, learn, earn, pay back or ever deserve, so it must be the result of a gift that is accepted or rejected (a free will choice).

This “Love” is much more than just an emotional feeling; it is God Himself (God is Love). If you see this Love you see God.

All mature adults do stuff that hurts others (this is called sin) these transgressions weigh on them, burden them, to the point the individual seeks relief (at least early on before they allow their hearts to be hardened). Lots of “alternatives” can be tried for relief, but the only true relief comes from God with forgiveness (this forgiveness is pure charity [grace/mercy/Love]). The correct humble acceptance of this Forgiveness (Charity) automatically will result in Love (we are taught by Jesus and our own experience “…he that is forgiven much will Love much…”). Sin is thus made hugely significant, so there will be an unbelievable huge debt to be forgiven of and thus result in an unbelievable huge “Love” (Godly type Love).

Sin has purpose in helping willing humans in fulfilling their objective. God does not like it but allows it.

Unfortunately, I, along with others, needed to see and know the brevity of life in order to respond sooner than later. Time is not on our side, since we do not get better, but worse. If everyone had at least 60 years, there would be no rush to repent and repenting does not get easier with time. We all tend to spiral down into the pigsty of life (like the prodigal son) and that does help, if when we do come to our senses we turn to the Father, but that does not have to take 60 years.

Let me just give you an example of How God works to help willing individuals.

If the nonbeliever had knowledge of God's existence that person would not need faith in God's existence, but faith is needed for humility and humility is needed to humbly accept pure charity and the only way to get Godly type Love is through accepting it as pure charity in the form of forgiveness.

This also shows a “need” for man to sin.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,057
57
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,962,858.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Any good wonderful intelligent father would know what his young rebellious unwise son would do with his inheritance.

The question is not the day and time of the young son’s return, but the father is waiting and watch in Love for the son.

Like with the father going out and asking the older son to please join the party with the young son, God working through Christians having us going out asking others to join the party (the elect), which is left to them to make the choice. There are reasons for not joining and reason to join, so it is their autonomous free will choice. God knowing which choice the person made, but the question must be asked and the answer given.
The problem is still your incorrect use. You have assumed things in that parable that cannot be substantiated.
God “letting them” allows both the right and wrong choice to be their free will choice, they can be accountable for making that choice.
Of course. You are arguing against a point that I’ve not made.
This one verse is taken out of context using an old translation: (KJV) Ro. 9: 21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

A better translation would be: (NIV) Ro 9:21 Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special (τιμὴν in Greek) purposes and some for common (ἀτιμίαν; in the Greek) use?

The reason for translating (τιμὴν) special purpose and (ἀτιμίαv) common purpose is: first because they can have those meanings and second because Paul uses these same Greek words in a similar analogy:

2 Tim. 2: 20 In a large house there are articles not only of gold and silver, but also of wood and clay; some are for special purposes (τιμὴν in Greek) and some for common use (ἀτιμίαν; in the Greek). 21 Those who cleanse themselves from the latter will be instruments for special purposes, made holy, useful to the Master and prepared to do any good work.

From Tim. 2:20 and knowing a rich person has things that are common (like water jugs) but would not have items of dishonor in his house the meaning is obvious?

Even more importantly here, Paul says: “Those who cleanse themselves from the latter will be instruments for special purposes (honor), made holy… So can a common (dishonorable) vessel become special (honorable)? Does this individual described as being “common” have to do something or does God only do it?

Romans chapter 9 takes lots of explanation, thinking, other verses, understanding of the context and time, so you cannot just take a verse out of context.
I haven’t taken it out of context. Here’s your NIV.

“What if God, although choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath—prepared for destruction? What if he did this to make the riches of his glory known to the objects of his mercy, whom he prepared in advance for glory—”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭9‬:‭22‬-‭23‬ ‭NIV‬‬

There are two objects in view. Those prepared for wrath, and those prepared for destruction. There’s no other context that shows this to not be true.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,831
1,928
✟1,005,358.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The problem is still your incorrect use. You have assumed things in that parable that cannot be substantiated.
Where is your support for saying I am “incorrect use” of the parable, did Christ give you special insight into the correct meaning, you need to be a lot more specific and give what you see as the “true meaning”.
I haven’t taken it out of context. Here’s your NIV.

“What if God, although choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath—prepared for destruction? What if he did this to make the riches of his glory known to the objects of his mercy, whom he prepared in advance for glory—”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭9‬:‭22‬-‭23‬ ‭NIV‬‬

There are two objects in view. Those prepared for wrath, and those prepared for destruction. There’s no other context that shows this to not be true.
The context of Ro. 9:21 is God (our Potter) making vessels, special and common, that leave His shop (they would have the potter’s mark on their bottom) as representee of God’s work (the Potter God would be pleased with both). Potters back in the first century did not make, clay pigeons, for destruction and no one at that time would imagine such an item from a wonderful skilled potter, since he made common items and special items, ideal for their purpose.

In the context of, all of Romans and especially Ro. 9, the topic is Jews and Gentiles with the Jews represent those made (born into the world) with a very special purpose and the gentiles made (born into the world) as very common. So, what objects would the Potter want destroyed after they leave the Potter’s shop which are prepared for what they were made to do? Over time some vessels from the special group and the common group would crack from misuse and the Potter would not want His mark on any damaged vessel. God has always intended to show His glory to those vessels, who maintain quality worthy of the Potter’s mark.

Explaining all of Romans, all of Romans 9-11 and/or just Romans 9, takes lots of words.
 
Upvote 0