obviously this is going to be an uphill battle....the heart here refers to the determination or deep seated self that is who you are. For example, "he believed with all his heart that she loved him" is not referring to the pump inside the chest but rather to the very nature of who the guy is.
Ie: the brain. That's where you do your thinking. That's where your "mind" is. That's where your "personality" is.
Likewise, if you look up heart in scripture, it is this deep seated core of the man that is being referred to here. It's all about context.
Actually, it's all about poetry.
The fact of the matter is that your brain is what you do your thinking with. It's in the brain that thoughts, beliefs, convictions, etc are formed and formulated.
It's what the brain does.
like I said, belief unto salvation is not a belief of the mind but of the very core of man
Which is the exact same thing, using different words.
, therefore it does not have to be rational and logical and thought out though it can be.
If you care about being rational, it should.
The fact that you are basically saying that I should NOT care, and simply circumvent rationality and logical thinking, speaks volumes actually....
Take the above, the "she" might be acting hateful but the "he" still believes with his heart that she loved him....not rational and yet belief none the less.
Indeed. Not rational. Not to mention that his belief is mistaken.
That's the thing with irrational belief... they often are mistaken. But if the reasoning of the belief is irrational / illogical, how would you know - if you don't actually care?
Also, keep in mind that you aren't actually arguing against my point. I didn't even speak about rationality. I spoke about how I can not simply decide on a whim what I will and will not belief.
I can't simply
choose to believe that Thor causes lightning. I could pretend I do, but I could not
really, actually believe that like I believe that I will plummeth to my death when jumping from the Empire State building.
but you choose every day what you will and will not believe.
I do not.
For example, the cake is sitting on the counter, do you choose to believe it will be yummy or not? It's a choice..
No. It is an expectation based on my previous experiences with tasting cakes.
Nore is that really a "belief". Rather, it is a subjective personal preference based on my likes and dislikes (which I don't choose either, btw). Which is not the same thing. Obviously.
I really don't know why you seem to be getting so upset about this
I'm not upset. I just don't see how you can't comprehend this, while it is rather easy to understand for yourself how it is to NOT believe a certain thing, because there is a very wide range of things that you do not believe. You are not into Viking Gods, for example. You do not believe that Odin and Thor are real.
Honestly now... could you here and now
really consciously decide that you will start believing that these Gods are real? And
really honestly believe it?
I say: no, you could not. At best, you could
pretend to.
What we believe or don't believe does nothing to change truth. sure you can, what you choose just does nothing to change the truth or lie of those claims
It's not the truth of the claims that is the subject of discussion here.
My point is that it is completely immoral / unethical to punish or reward people for things that are not under their control.
Punishing someone for not being convinced of a certain thing, is like punishing someone for the color of their skin.