Visit this site.
www.answersingenesis.org
There is more evidence for creation then the "text books" will reveal. The fossil record is exactly what we would expect if the bible were true.
Also Darwin knew absolutely nothing about genetics. He thought cells were blobs of carbon. It wasn't until modern equipment actually looked inside the cell to see the vastly complex machine that it is that modern genetics took form. Trusting a theory involving genetics from a man who didn't even know DNA existed is foolish to say the least.
Also it is true that most genetic mutations are harmful or have no effect. But it is also true that some beneficial mutations do occur. But in either case they never involve and increase in genetic information. It always involves either a lose, or rearranging of existing information.
If we are to conclude that evolution is caused by mutations and it also involves simple organisms becoming more complex there would have to be an increase in genetic information. This is not possible through mutations. What we do see however is exactly what we would if the bible were true. Life is degenerating, not evolving. Our genome has many errors where as in the beginning there were none. In a decaying world we would expect to see degeneration rather than an evolution of life. And surely there is a scientific law which supports this. Law #2 of thermodynamics. All matter and energy increase in entropy, or become less complex. It decays to it's simplest form. We grow old, our cars rust etc. This law contradicts the ability of matter to go from inanimate to living and then to a complex organism. evolutionists have tried to counter this but have been unsuccessful.
What you have to realize is that evolution is unproved and unprovable. It is just as much a faith as creation is. It is not science in any form. There is plenty of evidence to contradict evolution. What you also have to realize is that we all have the same evidence. It's how you see the evidence based on your personal bias.
Archaeopteryx has been identified as a true bird, not a missing link.
Ramapithecus is an extinct orangutan. All so called human ancestors have been identified as either true human, or true ape or a hoax/misidentified body part. There are no missing links.
I however am not an expert so I'm not good at debating the matter. I'm just someone who has read and watched alot about it. The experts are on the site I linked you to. There is a search function on there and just about any question you have can be answered there. If not you can contact them I'm sure.