It becomes ridiculous when one goes to the extreme effort to run all evidence on its own head as to negate its validity.
I'm not baiting you, not sure why you are being extremely defensive on the subject. Just questioning your post thats all.
Defensive? When a people are being killed because of words spoken from pulpits, defenisveness is a reality-based orientation.
why would someone interpret it in any other way, other than to make it agree with them?
Or the opposite? It begs the question.
In the end one's integrity is all one has. If one spends one's life seeking to harm one's LGBT brothers and sisters, or, if one seeks to affirm their capacities to love, is up to the individual.
Would you call that Spirit-led interpretation or private interpretation?
The charge of "private interpretation" is a red herring. EVERYONE makes private interpretations and there is no other type of interpretation. If you accept someone else's interpretation you make the decision whether to do that or not. If one seeks to do the right thing it could be called "SPIRIT-LED" but as I am not a fundamentalist I do not use that term particularly.
Scripture is truth, but truth does not conform to our wills, rather ours to it.
So it's said, but what it means depends on who's reading it. Everybody brings the sum total of who they are and what they've experienced to everything they do. To pretend otherwise is to deny reality.
I know there are people who do this, as well as some who are selective in their interpretations as to profess that God encourages and loves gay sex. Are either ones right? by scripture?
I don't think you can win this with a pot and kettle argument. I think everyone determines what is best for them. The idea God "loves" or "hates" particular sex acts or not is to denigrate God. One cann either say all human functions are gloirious or disgusting depending on one's mood. To emphasize sexual acts however is to denigrate LGBTs.
Well that confirms that you know absolutely nothing about me. If you wish to see me as arrogant, then you have that right.
Could I not say the same thing? And you did make an arrogant post, or else your evil twin did.
Am I a biblical scholar? Nope. Are you? Perhaps, but unlikely.
Having been a PK who typed sermons and presently in two Bible studies I'm still pretty much a layperson at it but I have made extensive study of the misuse of the terrible texts which homophobes memorize to harass their LGBT brothers and sisters.
What does the vast majority of biblical scholars say about same-sex sex?
Not a whole lot, actually. More are concerned with who wrote what, when, and why.
I suppose it depends on how one defines "biblical scholars". It's kind of hard to be a fundamentalist and give an honest analysis. Among mainline scholars probably a slim majority favor affirming those of minority orientation's capacities to love.
All who are approaching it with integrity consider the context of the passages. Those who use them as weapons to attack those they hate neither consider it or acknowledge it.