MartinM
GondolierAce
There's no need. The problems that have already been raised are quite sufficient. His 'rebuttals' simply don't address the substantive points of the criticisms at all.Drotar said:I would like to see it. Not the long explanation- just where you present NEW information or problems on the white hole cosmology that Humphries HASN'T already rebutted
How the hell would you know? Because Humphreys says so?Several have stepped up to the plate and swung but never hit it past the pitcher
Upvote
0