Question for Evolutionists

[Schroeder]

I expect there's evidence. But that's not the point - the argument was raised that something was irreducibly complex. The burden of proof is now on you to show that the organs couldn't have evolved to become co-dependent, because that's what your argument is relying on.
It is not up to us to disprove your argument - it is up to you to prove it.

well i am not prepared to argue this. I dont know enough to do it. But if HE said they did evolve to be co-dependant then he should prove his point first or as well. YOur arguement goes both ways. since he brought it up or who ever did should be the one to prove there point. And if one does bring such an arguement then one who says it not true should show a little bit of evidence not just say thats not true.