• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Question for atheists regarding "the problem of evil"

Atheists: If you got stabbed tomorrow night in the taco bell parking lot who most-likely did it?

  • Born-Again Christian

  • Godless atheist

  • Someone who calls themselves a Christian, but lives like a godless heathen


Results are only viewable after voting.

Undead

Active Member
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2018
141
90
54
Colorado
✟9,298.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I find it amusing when atheists ask about the "problem of evil" because it reminds me an awful lot of a cigarette smoker coming up to a non-smoker and asking "Why do I smoke?" and the non smoker is like uh... don't.

Let me get right to the point. Most of the terrible evil in this life is caused by the actions of godless hedonists.
Even if you can point to a few horrible cases of priests molesting children for years, they were not behaving Christlike. Let me put it another way-- no one has ever sinned and been Christ-like at the same time. You could almost say they were behaving more like godless heathens when molesting children. And we also know that not everyone calling themselves a Christian is an actual Christian.
The BTK Killer was actually a deacon at a church--imagine that! (I would like to have a talk with the pastor some day, whatever church it was--but I know that will never happen). He should be held accountable and the public should get to know whether he is still an active Pastor somewhere.

So let me be as blunt as possible to all atheists who care to tackle this one.. because.. you're asking me.. when I'm asking YOU.

If you were walking back to your car from Taco Bell at 2am with a bag of food and 5 bucks in your wallet, and someone walks up and stabs you for your food and $5, was it more likely a born-again Christian that just murdered you, or one of your godless hedonistic brethren? Be honest now.

Let me show you something that Jefferey Dahmer said, and you tell me how his idea of morality is any different than yours.. tell me what words of his you would change (if any)

"If a person doesn’t think there is a God to be accountable to, then—then what's the point of trying to modify your behaviour to keep it within acceptable ranges? That's how I thought anyway. I always believed the theory of evolution as truth, that we all just came from the slime. When we, when we died, you know, that was it, there is nothing ..."
(source: Wikipedia)

Now let me answer your unasked question: There are no born-again serial rapists or killers. How can I tell this is a fact? Because Christ changes people from the inside out--and while we still sin--take me for example.. I may sin and tell my wife to "shut up" or something dumb like that-- but I am no longer breaking in houses, stealing guns to take down and hand to potential murderers in exchange for crack cocaine. Can we all agree that while we never stop sinning, our sins change drastically once we are truly born again? The prostitute who is born-again, may still let a cuss word fly every now and again but she is not out standing on the street corner anymore--not if she is truly born again.
The test: If she is still selling her body, then she didn't truly get saved.
This is not an example of the "no true scotsman" fallacy--if you think it is then you don't know what that fallacy means.
Here, let me show you (from Wikipedia)
"Philosophy professor Bradley Dowden explains the fallacy as an "ad hoc rescue" of a refuted generalization attempt. The following is a simplified rendition of the fallacy:

Person A: "No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."
Person B: "But my uncle Angus is a Scotsman and he puts sugar on his porridge."
Person A: "Ah yes, but no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge.""
===
I bolded the important part--because defining what a Christian is, is not an "ad hoc rescue" we have tons of Scripture that defines what a true Christian is. We have the beatitudes, we have the Commandments, and we have Jesus' two commandments in which all the law and the prophets are upheld. Love God with all your heart all your soul and all your mind--and the second one is like the first-- love your neighbor as yourself. So if you murder a child, you are breaking both of these commandments. (Mark 12:30-31 "Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’ 31 The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no commandment greater than these.”)

So when the atheist asks about the problem of evil, he is really asking us why we all don't just serve God like we are supposed to. Then would there be evil? Sure, some.. but not to the degree that we see on the news.

And the next unasked question: "I thought there were no degrees to sin-- I thought in the eyes of God, sin is sin is sin."
This is true, but also needs some light shed on it. While God does not put degrees to sin (sin being defined from an archery term which merely means "to miss the mark" ) then to miss the mark is to miss the mark. BUT
I think you will all agree with me that even though Jesus said "If you have lusted in your heart for your neighbor's wife, then you have already sinned." that this certainly does not mean that you should go ahead and have an affair since you already sinned.
The difference here being the consequences of acting out sin in real life is far greater than sinning in one's heart.
Can we all agree that me fantasizing about killing my boss is sin, but actually killing my boss is a greater sin because the consequences of my sin are much greater? There is his wife, who is now a widow, there are his children who loved him, I will spend the rest of my life in prison-- there are the first responders who put their lives on the line to come to secure the scene. There could be collateral damage (shot went through him and also wounded or killed his secretary). etc..etc.. ad infinitum.

The bottom line, to go along with my other post I made to Rinitau (found here: Christians: how do you reconcile the problem of evil?)

Is that if everyone would simply follow God and His ways, then we would all share, we would all love one another. We would never stab another person for their burritos, we would have way less poverty and disease--we would not have war, or famines (or at least they would be greatly decreased).

The problem of evil is not a problem of evil, it is a matter of these two ideas co-existing: Evil + Free Will. You simply cannot look at the "problem of evil" in a vacuum. If there were no free will, there would be no evil.
Use your free will to stop being part of the problem and become part of the love-solution.

Lastly, if you say "Even if we all held hands and sang kumbaya, we would still have trees occasionally falling on houses and killing sleeping infants in their cribs" This is a result of the fall of Adam and Eve. Now disease has entered the world--now the Earth is working against us, the devil will be at enmity with our seed, but he will bruise our heel and we will bruise his head (sounds worse for him) now Eve has pain in child-birth and has a lust to have her husband's authority.
You ate the apple and so did I. The sooner we come to grips with this, the better. The sooner we stop saying "But why am I punished for Adam's sin?" the better, because if it were you or I, we would have also sinned eventually. Maybe we would have taken longer, or maybe shorter-- but there is a saying.. maybe you've heard it but never quite understood what it meant: "Laws were made to be broken" (Usually people say this while laughing and shoplifting) but what it means is that The Commandments were given to show that we could not keep them, no matter how hard we tried--God was showing us that we need Him--and His saving grace. Atonement for our sins.
And He has provided for us that bridge to the Father through His torturous death.
Once you accept Christ--the problem of evil disappears (for you). Will you still stub your toe in the garage--sure--but remember what I said--all this life is, is a means to an end. WE ALL DIE.

If you have the spirit of God in you when you die, then you go to be with Him for all eternity, no more tears, no more pain. No memory of it. But if you die because one of your heathen brethren stabs you tomorrow night for your burrito supreme, then you die like the beasts of the field, no different than a buffalo who dies in an unusually brutal Kansas winter--does this offend you? I recommend you take God's olive branch as soon as possible.
There is no problem of evil-- there is a "problem" of free will--and people using it to spit in God's face.

In conclusion, there is no "problem of evil" there is a "blessing of free will" (but people misuse it).
What are your questions at this time?
 

Nithavela

you're in charge you can do it just get louis
Apr 14, 2007
30,671
22,311
Comb. Pizza Hut and Taco Bell/Jamaica Avenue.
✟590,087.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
I see, only non-Christians can start threads.
I will ask that this be moved.

That is one good way to dodge an answer--I'll give you that. Thanks for pointing out the rules though
As I'm not an atheist, that wasn't directed at me anyway.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: Undead
Upvote 0

Brightmoon

Apes and humans are all in family Hominidae.
Mar 2, 2018
6,297
5,539
NYC
✟166,950.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Episcopalian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I put the so called Christian as my answer because most people in the USA identify as Christians . Atheists tend to be a small part of the population and unlike their stereotype , they tend to actually think through their morality ,why they believe things and , what their behavior should be. I’m not an atheist, I just know a lot of them
 
Upvote 0

Moral Orel

Proud Citizen of Moralton
Site Supporter
May 22, 2015
7,379
2,640
✟499,248.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
The problem of evil is not a problem of evil, it is a matter of these two ideas co-existing: Evil + Free Will. You simply cannot look at the "problem of evil" in a vacuum. If there were no free will, there would be no evil.
But there could be free will and no evil, so they aren't intrinsically linked.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Voted christian i live in the us of a, me bumping into another atheist in person is super rare, thiers just not that many of us by comparision.

I think there are more than you think. Many in the US, just stay in the closet about it, because of the social stigma.
 
Upvote 0

jacknife

Theophobic troll
Oct 22, 2014
2,046
849
✟186,524.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
I think there are more than you think. Many in the US, just stay in the closet about it, because of the social stigma.
Thats probably true i live in a very religous area as well, but still i dont think the number of us are near as many as the number of christians within the us
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Thats probably true i live in a very religous area as well, but still i dont think the number of us are near as many as the number of christians within the us

No question about that. Just saying, the actual non-believer number, is a lot higher than advertised.
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Eight Foot Manchild

His Supreme Holy Correctfulness
Sep 9, 2010
2,389
1,605
Somerville, MA, USA
✟155,694.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
What are your questions at this time?

Why are you pretending like your moral philosophy has anything at all to do with good or bad behavior?

In your system, I could spend a lifetime murdering and raping, have a deathbed conversion at the very last second and go on to an eternal reward. Conversely, I could spend a lifetime as an atheist philanthropist and volunteer for Doctors Without Borders and go to an eternity in hell. Behavior is utterly irrelevant.

Anyway, I don't distinguish between the first and third options on your poll in any meaningful way, so I just went with the first.
 
Upvote 0

Eight Foot Manchild

His Supreme Holy Correctfulness
Sep 9, 2010
2,389
1,605
Somerville, MA, USA
✟155,694.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Actually, I take it back. There is one meaningful distinction - since 'godless heathens' are statistically less violent, the Christian who 'lives like a godless heathen' is less likely to be the one doing the stabbing.

This is all to say nothing of the fact that I would never insult real Mexican cuisine by eating Taco Bell in the first place.....but that's just me being a wiseguy.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: DogmaHunter
Upvote 0

DogmaHunter

Code Monkey
Jan 26, 2014
16,757
8,531
Antwerp
✟158,395.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
I find it amusing when atheists ask about the "problem of evil" because it reminds me an awful lot of a cigarette smoker coming up to a non-smoker and asking "Why do I smoke?" and the non smoker is like uh... don't.

Let me get right to the point. Most of the terrible evil in this life is caused by the actions of godless hedonists.
Even if you can point to a few horrible cases of priests molesting children for years, they were not behaving Christlike. Let me put it another way-- no one has ever sinned and been Christ-like at the same time. You could almost say they were behaving more like godless heathens when molesting children. And we also know that not everyone calling themselves a Christian is an actual Christian.
The BTK Killer was actually a deacon at a church--imagine that! (I would like to have a talk with the pastor some day, whatever church it was--but I know that will never happen). He should be held accountable and the public should get to know whether he is still an active Pastor somewhere.

So let me be as blunt as possible to all atheists who care to tackle this one.. because.. you're asking me.. when I'm asking YOU.

If you were walking back to your car from Taco Bell at 2am with a bag of food and 5 bucks in your wallet, and someone walks up and stabs you for your food and $5, was it more likely a born-again Christian that just murdered you, or one of your godless hedonistic brethren? Be honest now.

Let me show you something that Jefferey Dahmer said, and you tell me how his idea of morality is any different than yours.. tell me what words of his you would change (if any)

"If a person doesn’t think there is a God to be accountable to, then—then what's the point of trying to modify your behaviour to keep it within acceptable ranges? That's how I thought anyway. I always believed the theory of evolution as truth, that we all just came from the slime. When we, when we died, you know, that was it, there is nothing ..."
(source: Wikipedia)

Now let me answer your unasked question: There are no born-again serial rapists or killers. How can I tell this is a fact? Because Christ changes people from the inside out--and while we still sin--take me for example.. I may sin and tell my wife to "shut up" or something dumb like that-- but I am no longer breaking in houses, stealing guns to take down and hand to potential murderers in exchange for crack cocaine. Can we all agree that while we never stop sinning, our sins change drastically once we are truly born again? The prostitute who is born-again, may still let a cuss word fly every now and again but she is not out standing on the street corner anymore--not if she is truly born again.
The test: If she is still selling her body, then she didn't truly get saved.
This is not an example of the "no true scotsman" fallacy--if you think it is then you don't know what that fallacy means.
Here, let me show you (from Wikipedia)
"Philosophy professor Bradley Dowden explains the fallacy as an "ad hoc rescue" of a refuted generalization attempt. The following is a simplified rendition of the fallacy:

Person A: "No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."
Person B: "But my uncle Angus is a Scotsman and he puts sugar on his porridge."
Person A: "Ah yes, but no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge.""
===
I bolded the important part--because defining what a Christian is, is not an "ad hoc rescue" we have tons of Scripture that defines what a true Christian is. We have the beatitudes, we have the Commandments, and we have Jesus' two commandments in which all the law and the prophets are upheld. Love God with all your heart all your soul and all your mind--and the second one is like the first-- love your neighbor as yourself. So if you murder a child, you are breaking both of these commandments. (Mark 12:30-31 "Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’ 31 The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no commandment greater than these.”)

So when the atheist asks about the problem of evil, he is really asking us why we all don't just serve God like we are supposed to. Then would there be evil? Sure, some.. but not to the degree that we see on the news.

And the next unasked question: "I thought there were no degrees to sin-- I thought in the eyes of God, sin is sin is sin."
This is true, but also needs some light shed on it. While God does not put degrees to sin (sin being defined from an archery term which merely means "to miss the mark" ) then to miss the mark is to miss the mark. BUT
I think you will all agree with me that even though Jesus said "If you have lusted in your heart for your neighbor's wife, then you have already sinned." that this certainly does not mean that you should go ahead and have an affair since you already sinned.
The difference here being the consequences of acting out sin in real life is far greater than sinning in one's heart.
Can we all agree that me fantasizing about killing my boss is sin, but actually killing my boss is a greater sin because the consequences of my sin are much greater? There is his wife, who is now a widow, there are his children who loved him, I will spend the rest of my life in prison-- there are the first responders who put their lives on the line to come to secure the scene. There could be collateral damage (shot went through him and also wounded or killed his secretary). etc..etc.. ad infinitum.

The bottom line, to go along with my other post I made to Rinitau (found here: Christians: how do you reconcile the problem of evil?)

Is that if everyone would simply follow God and His ways, then we would all share, we would all love one another. We would never stab another person for their burritos, we would have way less poverty and disease--we would not have war, or famines (or at least they would be greatly decreased).

The problem of evil is not a problem of evil, it is a matter of these two ideas co-existing: Evil + Free Will. You simply cannot look at the "problem of evil" in a vacuum. If there were no free will, there would be no evil.
Use your free will to stop being part of the problem and become part of the love-solution.

Lastly, if you say "Even if we all held hands and sang kumbaya, we would still have trees occasionally falling on houses and killing sleeping infants in their cribs" This is a result of the fall of Adam and Eve. Now disease has entered the world--now the Earth is working against us, the devil will be at enmity with our seed, but he will bruise our heel and we will bruise his head (sounds worse for him) now Eve has pain in child-birth and has a lust to have her husband's authority.
You ate the apple and so did I. The sooner we come to grips with this, the better. The sooner we stop saying "But why am I punished for Adam's sin?" the better, because if it were you or I, we would have also sinned eventually. Maybe we would have taken longer, or maybe shorter-- but there is a saying.. maybe you've heard it but never quite understood what it meant: "Laws were made to be broken" (Usually people say this while laughing and shoplifting) but what it means is that The Commandments were given to show that we could not keep them, no matter how hard we tried--God was showing us that we need Him--and His saving grace. Atonement for our sins.
And He has provided for us that bridge to the Father through His torturous death.
Once you accept Christ--the problem of evil disappears (for you). Will you still stub your toe in the garage--sure--but remember what I said--all this life is, is a means to an end. WE ALL DIE.

If you have the spirit of God in you when you die, then you go to be with Him for all eternity, no more tears, no more pain. No memory of it. But if you die because one of your heathen brethren stabs you tomorrow night for your burrito supreme, then you die like the beasts of the field, no different than a buffalo who dies in an unusually brutal Kansas winter--does this offend you? I recommend you take God's olive branch as soon as possible.
There is no problem of evil-- there is a "problem" of free will--and people using it to spit in God's face.

In conclusion, there is no "problem of evil" there is a "blessing of free will" (but people misuse it).
What are your questions at this time?

Isn't it curious then, that while the US is the most religious country of the western world, it also has the most violent crime?

Isn't it curious then, that while some 10% of american citizens are atheists, that percentage drops to below 1% when we only look at prison populations?

Isn't it curious then, that most the domestic violence in the US, is found in the so-called bible belt?

The difference between you and me, is that those figures don't make me conclude that christianity makes people violent and/or evil.

Although I'll end with an infamous Hitchslap, for kicks and giggles:
"Good people will do good things and bad people will do bad things. But for good people to do bad things, you require religion"



ps: I didn't answer your poll, because it is dishonest and loaded.
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,686
6,192
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,119,986.00
Faith
Atheist
"Good people will do good things and bad people will do bad things. But for good people to do bad things, you require religion"

I think Hitchens may have quote him, but the original is Steven Weinberg
Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

ETA source: Steven Weinberg - Wikiquote
 
Upvote 0