I'm on my lunch break at work now, so I can reply

Since I have used "we" at least once, I'm assuming that I could the one being referred to.
I just want to make it absolutely clear how uncultic my "we" references should be interpreted. I use "we" as a reference to the body of Christ as a whole, and the effort we should make as Christ's children to take the Gospel to unbelievers without embellishment or compromise. I have my views on outreach, such as when I said "whilst we most definitely need to meet people where they are, it's essential that we don't do what amounts to rewriting the Gospel.", that I believe are Scripturally based, and thus I think could be applicable to not just my efforts, but the efforts of others. I can't for the life of me interpret the above sentence as being cultish, but then again, I acknowledge that I may not have been whom was referred to. Hence why I think it's constructive to directly address others in the form of quotes.
To address the rest of your post - in my curent occupation in a Christian bookshop, I know full well what the current popular themes are in Christian books and music. And unfortunately it seems to resemble more of a self-help/motivational genre than true theological insight. As true as it is that it would be unwise to have all books on every topic of theology under the sun, it's not necessarily helpful that the branches of thought that the top selling books are being written on are more focussed on potential, success, victory and the like instead of attributes such as holiness and grace. As a matter of fact, sometimes when I hear "I", I fear that to be to a degree cultish, since it oftem is attached to the word "will". And those 2 words, when combined with actions that we as fallible humans may not be capable of doing, can be almost as dangerous as direct heretical teachings to any believer, whether fledgling or mature.