Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Read your entire post. Mice stayed mice..... your point of mice staying mice is what? That mutations make mice, mice? Kind after Kind, I already understood this.So, you didn't bother to read anything or to grasp why that paper was listed.
As usual.
Read your entire post. Mice stayed mice..... your point of mice staying mice is what? That mutations make mice, mice?
Are you claiming to be unaware of the fact that finch DNA was tested and every one was found to have been interbreeding after arriving on the islands? Dont you know what occurrs within the scientific community?
You have yet to show any examples except incorrect classifications. All those finches are interbreeding. Tigers mate with Lions, hasnt kept them from keeping them classified incorrectly. Grizzlies produce offspring with polar bears. same incorrect classification.
You've killed your own theory by refusing to accept the observational data....
Don't know why the facts would lead you to that conclusion. Over 100 breeds of canine have occurred from wolves. It's you that needs new species to develop where they didn't exist before. I fully accept new subspecies within the species arise by mating. The Chinook is direct empirical evidence, as is the Afro-Asian.
But notice all humans are one species, as are all canines. Variation within the species does indeed occur, but Kind will always propagate Kind, regardless of the variation capable within that Kind. And the Chinook and Afro-Asian did not occur because of any evolution...... That variation within the Kind required not one shred of evolutionary theory to be valid....
Adam, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, et.al. would all disagree.The point: all you (or anyone) knows of “god,” is what other humans have said, god has said.
Wow...
I should have remembered the knowledge level of the target audience.
The first 2 papers are about TESTING the methods of using molecular data to assess hypotheses of descent. The first one, in fact, used KNOWN relationships among inbred mice to test the methods, the second generated a known phylogeny of virus, and then tested THAT known phylogeny using the molecular methods.
The third APPLIED those methods to real data of unknown phylogeny.
Get it now?
There are more - many more, of course, to include the thousands cited on the Tree of Life Web site that you dismissed.
So where is that finch data you were referring to?
Surely you do not think your silly 'Asians are Asians allies' nonsense is data?
LOL.
The observational data that demonstrates the "super genome" which contains all possible varieties for each kind?
What a hypocrite.
So where is that finch data you were referring to?
Have you seen the genome advance? Or is everything that already existed simply copied into new formats? Be honest with yourself if not with others.
That all life is similar and created from the same dust?
Are you claiming to be unaware of the fact that finch DNA was tested and every one was found to have been interbreeding after arriving on the islands?
Please stop writing things like this. When one considers that you have claimed such things as DNA 'letters' must spring from nowhere to be considered new, that alleles are 'allies' and are 'genetic strands', etc., and add to that the fact that you are almost certainly just parroting something you've seen on a creationist website, but cannot actually understand much less explain, you just make yourself look foolish.Dont you know what occurrs within the scientific community?
You have yet to show any examples except incorrect classifications.
No idea what you are prattling on about. Do you have a sensible point?All those finches are interbreeding. Tigers mate with Lions, hasnt kept them from keeping them classified incorrectly. Grizzlies produce offspring with polar bears. same incorrect classification.
You've killed your own theory by refusing to accept the observational data....
Don't know why the facts would lead you to that conclusion. Over 100 breeds of canine have occurred from wolves. It's you that needs new species to develop where they didn't exist before. I fully accept new subspecies within the species arise by mating. The Chinook is direct empirical evidence, as is the Afro-Asian.
But notice all humans are one species, as are all canines.
Variation within the species does indeed occur, but Kind will always propagate Kind, regardless of the variation capable within that Kind.
How did we get the African and the Asian alleles in the first place, from a single breeding pair?And the Chinook and Afro-Asian did not occur because of any evolution...... That variation within the Kind required not one shred of evolutionary theory to be valid....
Nooooo, please don't.
He thinks that because some different species galapagos finches are capable of interbreeding all taxonomic classification going back to the dinosaurs is wrong.... ergo...... the theory of evolution is wrong.
He ignores the fact that the definition of species doesn't say that closely related species can't interbreed.
That all life is similar and created from the same dust? Why of course such testing would show a similarity that you might confuse as ancestry.
Darwin finches' messy family tree
"The study also revealed a surprisingly large amount of "gene flow" between the branches of the family.
This indicates that the species have continued to interbreed or hybridise, after diversifying when they first arrived on the islands."
But lets be honest with each other. They were never reproductively isolated, speciation never occurred. Their was no hybridization because they were never reproductively isolated as Darwin believed they were.
Error after uncorrected error. Incorrect classification after incorrect classification. This is the ToE.
But because they contain the name Darwin, biologists refuse to correct the mistaken classification.
Defining a species
"For example, these happy face spiders look different, but since they can interbreed, they are considered the same species: Theridion grallator."
Accept the truth and stop following tales told by those that refuse to follow their own definitions.
Have you seen the genome advance? Or is everything that already existed simply copied into new formats? Be honest with yourself if not with others.
The observational data does indeed confirm that only what already exists is copied and transcribed. A hypocrite is someone that understands the data but refuses to accept it. I'd suggest a mirror for you to look into when using that word.
Accept the truth and stop following tales told by those that refuse to follow their own definitions.
I did: genus.Did you ever give a defintion of "kind"?
Did you ever get one for species?Did you ever give a defintion of "kind"?
Mammal is the class, btw.......There are 187 genera of Bat.
~30,000 genera of beetle.
1258 genera of mammal.
And so on.
Want to re-think your answer?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?