Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!
no since in both reptile and a mammal ear you will need at least 3 parts for its minimal function. so you dont solved the problem of ic.Odd that you would post a picture of the mammal ear, since we have hundreds of fossils showing the transition. See Evolution of the mammalian middle ear
That is what scientists do for a living.Evidently you still think opinions are verifiable.
actually even in this system we still need at least 3 parts: a part that can detect vibrations, a part that can transmit it to the brain (or other system that can process a signal) and a part that can process the signal.Hearing is a particular form of detecting vibration. Vibrations can be detected with much simpler things than anything we recognise as an 'ear'. E.g. like the hair cells in a fish's lateral line.
Like eyes and sight, if you actually look at how it developed, there is no sudden leap that cannot be explained through standard evolution.
no since in both reptile and a mammal ear you will need at least 3 parts for its minimal function. so you dont solved the problem of ic.
You didn't say "superior intelligence" before, you said reason.
Are you saying that animals are incapable of learning... anything?
Now you're just babbling. "Superior intelligence..." To what?
Scientists are idiots ... lost and on their way to a place prepared for the devil and his angels.
Animals cannot judge between good and evil. Only Humans and God can. Gen 3:22
So what is your claim? That God used special creation to form 3 basic parts of the ear, and then left the rest of the mammallian middle ear to evolve over many millions of years? As Paul and I have pointed out to you, the evolution of the mammal's ear from the reptile-like ancestor is well documented.
[
As others have explained to you, the question is only one of the timing
That's right.Like I've said before, creationists will happily disparage science and scientists,
Would you stop shopping at Walmart if you heard Sam Walton was a creationist?pitabread said:... but they sure don't seem in a hurry to give up the benefits thereof.
Join the club.pitabread said:Does this make them hypocrites? I'd imagine so.
Would you stop shopping at Walmart if you heard Sam Walton was a creationist?
Would you give up labeling God's creatures with those goofy labels if you heard Carlos Linnaeus was a Christian?
Join the club.
Ah, then apparently my cats have divine intelligence. For they seem to know that, if two cats are blocking the path for the third to reach the feeding bowl, that the moral thing to do is to step to the side and let the other cat in.
OK, I will put down my clipboard. You talk. I will listen.Scientists are idiots ... lost and on their way to a place prepared for the devil and his angels.
But there's hope, if they'll just put down their clipboards and listen.
Maybe your daughter is right.Sure, and my daughter is convinced that they think. You can convince others of many false ideas. Just look at Trump.
What we don't understand is your claim that, since we do not find a series of intermediates at the species level, therefore such intermediates do not exist. We have documented many intermediates at the genera level and above. You simply ignore that, and go back to your infamous 50 word quotes about the species level.What is it about "New species usually appear in the fossil record suddenly, not connected with their ancestors by a series of intermediates you don't understand?
Try reading the article. Which I did.
The fossil is not 'in the wrong place'. It simply shows that the evolution of whales seems to have taken less time than previously suggested. I.e. 4 million years rather than 15 million years. The existence of the fossil is not in any way in conflict with the theory of evolution. It's only in conflict with the theory that the evolution of fully aquatic whales took 15 million years. Which isn't that newsworthy a theory to be shown to be (likely) wrong
Not a problem for evolution.if it can hear then its s till mean that it has a system that can detect sound waves. and again it means at least 3 parts as i showed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?