proving evolution as just a "theory"

[rjs330]

Next time you visit your physician, ask them whether the theory of evolution has been beneficial to medicine. Then, i would hold your ears when they respond.

You seem to make the same mistake that most evolutionists do. I am not sure how many times I have to say it. It does get tiresome really. But ai will try for your benefit since you must not have read what I've said many many times.

The adaptation of things or evolution of things I have no issue with. I have no issue with birds wing structure changing it the changing of viruses it whatever. That's just part of life the way God created it. The only problem I have is evolution from a common ancestor.

You don't need to believe in that in order to use science or medical science.

 

[joshua 1 9]

What you personally dont haveba problem with is irrelevant.

You seem to have a comprehension problem.
fig·ure of speech
noun

1. a word or phrase used in a non-literal sense for rhetorical or vivid effect.

 

[joshua 1 9]

ToE is the biggest Satanic Lie ever forced upon innocent children in the Public Schools.

Just what is in the Science/Biology book that you actually have a problem with?

 

[joshua 1 9]

Actually I was merely pointing out where you have been shown examples of beneficial mutations in the past, after you claimed you hadn't.

Mumbo Jumbo with a tap dance is not evidence.

 

[bhsmte]

You seem to have a comprehension problem.
fig·ure of speech
noun

1. a word or phrase used in a non-literal sense for rhetorical or vivid effect.

Serious projection.

 

[bhsmte]

You seem to make the same mistake that most evolutionists do. I am not sure how many times I have to say it. It does get tiresome really. But ai will try for your benefit since you must not have read what I've said many many times.

The adaptation of things or evolution of things I have no issue with. I have no issue with birds wing structure changing it the changing of viruses it whatever. That's just part of life the way God created it. The only problem I have is evolution from a common ancestor.

You don't need to believe in that in order to use science or medical science.

LOL

 

[joshua 1 9]

Well, i'm rubber and you're glue!!!

Pre 911 rhetoric. Now a days what you say can get you thrown in jail.

 

[bhsmte]

Mumbo Jumbo with a tap dance is not evidence.

Are you claiming you havent been given examples?

 

[bhsmte]

Pre 911 rhetoric. Now a days what you say can get you thrown in jail.

Such as?

 

[AV1611VET]

Such as?

Shouting FIRE in a crowed theater.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Such as?

It did not use to be against the law to threaten someone. Now with Homeland security it could be considered an act of terrorism.

 

[bhsmte]

It did not use to be against the law to threaten someone. Now with Homeland security it could be considered an act of terrorism.

You are saying then, before you could threaten anyone you like?

 

[bhsmte]

Shouting FIRE in a crowed theater.

Indeed. Of course, as long as there is a fire, you should be ok.

 

[joshua 1 9]

I look forward to your Math, or is this just more unsubstantiated rhetoric?

No one has ever actually observed a genuine mutation occurring in the natural environment which was beneficial (that is, adding useful genetic information to an existing genetic code), and therefore, retained by the selection process. For some reason, however, the idea has a certain persuasive quality about it and seems eminently reasonable to many people—until it is examined quantitatively, that is!

Let us give the evolutionist the benefit of every consideration. Assume that, at each mutational step, there is equally as much chance for it to be good as bad. Thus, the probability for the success of each mutation is assumed to be one out of two, or one-half. Elementary statistical theory shows that the probability of 200 successive mutations being successful is then (½)200, or one chance out of 1060. The number 1060, if written out, would be "one" followed by sixty "zeros." In other words, the chance that a 200-component organism could be formed by mutation and natural selection is less than one chance out of a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion!

The Mathematical Impossibility Of Evolution | The Institute for Creation Research

 

[bhsmte]

No one has ever actually observed a genuine mutation occurring in the natural environment which was beneficial (that is, adding useful genetic information to an existing genetic code), and therefore, retained by the selection process. For some reason, however, the idea has a certain persuasive quality about it and seems eminently reasonable to many people—until it is examined quantitatively, that is!

Let us give the evolutionist the benefit of every consideration. Assume that, at each mutational step, there is equally as much chance for it to be good as bad. Thus, the probability for the success of each mutation is assumed to be one out of two, or one-half. Elementary statistical theory shows that the probability of 200 successive mutations being successful is then (½)200, or one chance out of 1060. The number 1060, if written out, would be "one" followed by sixty "zeros." In other words, the chance that a 200-component organism could be formed by mutation and natural selection is less than one chance out of a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion!

The Mathematical Impossibility Of Evolution | The Institute for Creation Research

You are all over the place.

 

[joshua 1 9]

You are saying then, before you could threaten anyone you like?

I am saying the laws changed after the twin towers were destroyed.

United States Department of Homeland Security
Headquarters: Southwest, Washington, D.C., Washington, D.C.
Founder: George W. Bush
Founded: November 25, 2002
Number of employees: 229,000 (2017)
Annual budget: 40.6 billion USD (2017)

 

[joshua 1 9]

You are all over the place.

Sort of like racquetball. You have to play the ball where it goes. Is the pace to fast for you? Would you like us to slow it down a bit?

 

[bhsmte]

Sort of like racquetball. You have to play the ball where it goes. Is the pace to fast for you? Would you like us to slow it down a bit?

Dont have to slow down. Being consistent in your statements would help you though.

 

[bhsmte]

I am saying the laws changed after the twin towers were destroyed.

United States Department of Homeland Security
Headquarters: Southwest, Washington, D.C., Washington, D.C.
Founder: George W. Bush
Founded: November 25, 2002
Number of employees: 229,000 (2017)
Annual budget: 40.6 billion USD (2017)

I asked specific examples. How could you specifically threaten someone in the past, that you cant today.

 

[USincognito]

Oh another assumption. There is no way to show what is claimed here actually occurred.

Why are you having such trouble learning that using magic words like "assumptions" does not actually address the evidence or make it go away?