Prove it or remove it challenge

[Extraneous]

Then you simply don't understand the nature of evidence.

Why do you have a hard time understanding that there is such a thing as "Junk DNA". You want to deny that concept because that alone shows creationism to be wrong.

Here is a simple question for you that should lead to you understanding that there is such a thing as DNA that is not needed. Sadly to date every creationist has been afraid to answer it honestly:

What is more complex, you or an amoeba?

Please, science has no idea what noncoding DNA actually is. They are only making assumptions. That's not evidence, its ignorance.

 

[Subduction Zone]

How so? please enlighten me.

Your posts show that you do not even have a high school level of understanding science.

When you don't understand something the wise thing to do is to ask questions, politely.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Please, science has no idea what noncoding DNA actually is. They are only making assumptions. That's not evidence, its ignorance.

No, they have a very good idea. You are the one without a clue. And I see that you were too afraid to answer a simple question. One more time, not answering is the same as admitting that you are wrong:

What is more complex you or an amoeba?

 

[VirOptimus]

How so? please enlighten me.

Everything you post shows that you dont understand evolution theory, dna or even basic science. If you are going to post on a subject, learn about it first.

 

[The Cadet]

And just so you know, alleles accumulate in a population; not individuals. Outcome of evolution is species survival; not individuals. Sexual attraction may make life more fun, but doesn't do anything for individual survival. Didn't you go to college? If you had you would know that. No? Pity...

Actually, sexual attraction is a non-trivial aspect. It's not just about survival, it's about being able to pass on one's genes. And being able to attract a mate is a crucial part of that.

sesquipedalianism

YOU STOP THAT RIGHT NOW.

 

[Extraneous]

Your posts show that you do not even have a high school level of understanding science.

When you don't understand something the wise thing to do is to ask questions, politely.

WHat have i said that is in error?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Everything you post shows that you dont understand evolution theory, dna or even basic science. If you are going to post on a subject, learn about it first.

Hey!! Be fair! If creationists learned about science they would not be creationists.

 

[Subduction Zone]

WHat have i said that is in error?

Just about everything. By the way, why are you so afraid to answer a simple question?

 

[Extraneous]

Arrogance doesn't help ToE. It instead only proves to me that they are blinded by arrogance. What have i said that is in error? If i have erred then please enlighten me. I can learn as well as anyone i suppose.

 

[Extraneous]

Just about everything. By the way, why are you so afraid to answer a simple question?

I should try that argument in the theology forums, lol, that will win the argument.

 

[VirOptimus]

Arrogance doesn't help ToE. It instead only proves to me that they are blinded by arrogance. What have i said that is in error. If i have erred then please enlighten me. I can learn as well as anyone i suppose.

So, you, a person with no background in science or biology, claims that a scientific field that is over 150 years old with countless hardworking men and women, with tangible benefits in medicine etc, is in error and its the other side thats arrogant?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Arrogance doesn't help ToE. It instead only proves to me that they are blinded by arrogance. What have i said that is in error? If i have erred then please enlighten me. I can learn as well as anyone i suppose.

When people foolishly attack an idea that they don't understand instead of respectfully asking questions arrogance is all that they deserve.

Ask nicely and politely and answer questions when asked of you.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I should try that argument in the theology forums, lol, that will win the argument.

Since you are still acting like a coward I will point that out once again. If you want others to answer your questions you need to answer those that were asked of you first.

If you behave right I have no problem answering your questions. So far by your actions you have admitted that you are wrong.

 

[Extraneous]

When people foolishly attack an idea that they don't understand instead of respectfully asking questions arrogance is all that they deserve.

Ask nicely and politely and answer questions when asked of you.

No, thats not the case here. I simply made an observation. I did ask a question but you never answered it. You seem to be dodging the issue.

 

[Extraneous]

Since you are still acting like a coward I will point that out once again. If you want others to answer your questions you need to answer those that were asked of you first.

If you behave right I have no problem answering your questions. So far by your actions you have admitted that you are wrong.

I disagree with you, and that's not an attack, its a disagreement.

 

[Subduction Zone]

No, thats not the case here. I simply made an observation. I did ask a question but you never answered it. You seem to be dodging the issue.

I asked a question of you long before you asked one of me. I also answered your previous statement.

But thanks for continuing to show that those that support the theory of evolution are correct when they say that there are no honest creationists.

 

[Extraneous]

So, you, a person with no background in science or biology, claims that a scientific field that is over 150 years old with countless hardworking men and women, with tangible benefits in medicine etc, is in error and its the other side thats arrogant?

Im not arrogant, but if i am then the best way to prove it is by destroying my argument, not my character.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I disagree with you, and that's not an attack, its a disagreement.

Wrong again. I asked you a reasonable question after you made a rather foolish and ignorant statement. You keep running away from that question. That is the same as you admitting that you are wrong. Once again it is your turn to answer a question.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Im not arrogant, but if i am then the best way to prove it is by destroying my argument, not my character.

Your argument was destroyed. Sadly you did not understand that. I am trying to help you to understand how badly your argument failed.

 

[VirOptimus]

Im not arrogant, but if i am then the best way to prove it is by destroying my argument, not my character.

But your argument is destroyed. Many times. If you werent so arrogant and really tried to learn you would understand.