Ok I was asked what fossil type I am looking for ... I am not after a type ... I am after genuine evidence of the change
But how would you recognise such a fossil, if you can't even describe what features it would have to have for it to qualify as "genuine evidence"?
It sounds more and more like no fossil would ever convince you. It sounds more and more like you aren't even willing to listen.
If you can't even describe what kind of fossil would qualify as evidence, then what is the point of this "challenge"?
Clearly, to qualify as "evidence", it would have to meet certain criteria. I'm asking you what these criteria are. If you can't tell me.... then, again: what is the point of this "challenge"?
... There as I have stated are fossils of dinosaurs... And almost every currently living kind of animal ... WhT there is not is no strong evidence of change ... You supplied a handful of fossils ...
And they exhibit change. I gave you depictions (and names + ages) of fossils that represent the ancestral line of dolphines, where you can clearly see how, through time, the nostrils are moving from the front of the face (where they are typically found in land animals) to the top of the skull, where they are presently found in dolphins.
This clearly depicts the changes that the lineage went through from the original land animal to the current dolphin we know and love today.
So, I take it that this does not meet the criteria you have in your head but apparantly aren't willing to share.
All that is left for me at this point is to ask you what these mysterious criteria are.
But you aren't willing to share them.... My guess is that you don't want to share them, because in reality, you have no such criteria.
This tells me that you aren't planning on accepting ANY fossil as evidence for evolution. Which would mean that your "challenge" is dishonest.
So, I'll ask again: describe what kind / type of features a fossil would have to have in order for you to accept it as evidence of evolution.
If you can't answer that request, then your challenge is void. And dishonest. Because at that point, you have decided in advance that you won't accept any fossil as evidence. Not even crockoducks.
That is all the evidence on the transitional fossil page ... The sum total of changes ... Yet it does not show transition to modern species
I'll ask again: what, to you,
would look like a "transition to modern species"?
What features must a fossil have in order for you to accept it as a "transitional" fossil?
If you can't answer this question- then what are you asking for,
really?
... Yet we have fossils of all modern species .. So why are there no intermediate fossils. They never existed.
I just gave you examples of transitional fossils.
Several skulls of the dolphine lineage where the nostrils move further back, the younger the fossils are.
So, why do those not qualify as transitional fossils depicting the changes from a land animal with nostrils in the typical place, to a sea mammal with the nostrils on top of the skull?