Is this the same Michael Behe who was embarrassed on the witness stand in the Dover case when his irreducible complexity argument was shown to be in error?
The Dover court case has been pretty thoroughly deconstructed, with both sides crowing. I am sympathetic to Behe because I experienced the exact same deconversion from Darwinism that he did. And I share the same offense at the continuous stream of lies from the Darwinists.
To give an analogy of the judges decision:
Judge Jones - "So Dr Behe, you would agree then that a tsunami could have picked up and carried a floating bathtub that contained an original copy of Lao Tsu's Tao Te Ching, and flung it to the top of Pikes Peak, where it was found after a bolt of lightning struck the road, excavating an arrow shaped trench, which a child followed thinking it led to a bathroom. You would agree that that is possible?"
Dr Behe - "Yes, that's logically possible."
Judge Jones - "Let the record show that Dr Behe agrees with Darwin. Will the plaintiff attorneys please draw up my ruling as soon as possible."
Dr Behe - "That kid must have been really confused...did he want to take a bath?"
Upvote
0