Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's a sad joke.How does the current apologetics sub-forum measure-up?
I'm just not encumbered with such a limited access to God as you.No. Light (Truth, Jesus Messiah) and darkness have nothing in common.
nothing at all.
Jesus Says: Whoever rejects the Light, rejects the Father (God) , and there is no truth in them. They are full of darkness.
Jesus Says: Whoever rejects My Word, rejects Me, and has already rejected My Father in heaven.
Pretty poorly actually.
For me it seems that religious forums make me more cynical and atheistic. I'm not certain why this happens.
Anybody else experience this or maybe the opposite? Why do you think this happens?
So I've learned who to ignore and those whose opinion I value.
Have a guess.Is this because of the limitations and boundaries put on debate and dialogue?
I didn't say I used the ignore feature, sorry if you misunderstood. It's simply a matter of knowing how some respond and choose not to go round and round with them.A few years ago I prided myself on never using the ignore feature, I used to think it was a sign of weakness on my part, but now I find that the ignore feature is the only way I can visit an internet forum (of any subject, not just religion) and enjoy my time there.
I didn't say I used the ignore feature, sorry if you misunderstood. It's simply a matter of knowing how some respond and choose not to go round and round with them.
I wasn't on here when it changed so don't know what it was like, but have seen the imbalance. Thanks for your input.Have a guess.
Imagine if atheists or non-Christians told you you are free to discuss any topic with them - but after the initial post, no other Christian apart from you may add to the discussion, and your further replies must only consist of questions to "clarify points that remained unclear".
It's insulting, patronizing, and a total joke - but I guess it makes the participating Christians feel like they are "winning" (as if that was what debates are about).
I can see why a certain set of Christian members complained about GA and actively campaigned for its destruction. It's the same mindset that makes Trump and his followers complain about "fake news" when reporters do their job.
That, along with the greatly reduced number of participants as a result.Is this because of the limitations and boundaries put on debate and dialogue?
I have also wondered if some of the avatars labeled as Christian are actually trolls mocking Christianity. I am not referring to the fundamentalist members, but there are some Christians who write things I can't decide if they are actually serious. I have even wondered if they might be spies using this forum to send coded messages. LOL ... I suppose that is unlikely.I am positive there are atheists on every Christian forum who pretend to be Christian, and subtly (or not so subtly) try to convince people that Christianity is bad. Sadly, many moderators let them get away with it.
The biggest issue this forum faces is allowing normal political threads. If anything can engender anger and hatred, it's that.
I have also wondered if some of the avatars labeled as Christian are actually trolls mocking Christianity. I am not referring to the fundamentalist members, but there are some Christians who write things I can't decide if they are actually serious. I have even wondered if they might be spies using this forum to send coded messages. LOL ... I suppose that is unlikely.
I might be mistaken, but I think you are describing the rules for "Exploring Christianity" rather than "Christian Apologetics". I don't spend much time in the apologetics sub-forum, but it is only because I don't like philosophy. I prefer evidence of any kind - even subjective evidence. I don't trust my reasoning enough to have any trust in philosophy.Have a guess.
Imagine if atheists or non-Christians told you you are free to discuss any topic with them - but after the initial post, no other Christian apart from you may add to the discussion, and your further replies must only consist of questions to "clarify points that remained unclear".
The rule that often trips me up is the rule against blasphemy. I can't remember the specifics of the blasphemy rule, but I remember that it seemed very broad.The other issue if you're a non Christian, you're not allowed to proslytize which is a reasonable rule on it's face. However it's definition is pretty broad, and can be applied at you if you're found to be winning arguments and going on the offensive.
So when people come in here and say you're worshipping Satan if you're pagan but you question the nature of their deity, you're the one found in contempt of the rules. That's why it's best to just take a light touch approach to those posters and avoid them since too much engagement can get you into trouble.
They used it to. Close down all of our "ask a (insert belief here) threads." They even used it on my ask an agnostic atheist thread and I'm not even sure any atheist really sets out to deconvert people. People sort of just deconvert as they gain more information.The other issue if you're a non Christian, you're not allowed to proslytize which is a reasonable rule on it's face. However it's definition is pretty broad, and can be applied at you if you're found to be winning arguments and going on the offensive.
So when people come in here and say you're worshipping Satan if you're pagan but you question the nature of their deity, you're the one found in contempt of the rules. That's why it's best to just take a light touch approach to those posters and avoid them since too much engagement can get you into trouble.
LOL!!! In the thread in this subforum: why Jews reject Jesus- I stated the most obvious reason from the Jewish pov. The post was, of course, removed due to complaint from another poster. It was judged to be blasphemous. You can't make this stuff up.The rule that often trips me up is the rule against blasphemy. I can't remember the specifics of the blasphemy rule, but I remember that it seemed very broad.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?