proposal - READ HERE 1ST BEFORE POSTING, sticky

[stone]

I need you guys help here.

We've recently received a whole bunch of reports that i think could have been avoided if we have a

Read here 1st before posting STICKY

so what do you guys say?

I'm thinking it should be simple, stateing that if you are not SDA then your post in this forum should be limited to asking questions and fellowshiping; along with a link to ya'lls wiki?

???

 

[djconklin]

Sounds good, except I doubt that it would have cut down much on the reports. Then there's those who claim to be SDA, abide by all 28 fundamentals, but don't have the love of God for their fellow human being who is in pain burning within them--can you ban them? Or, tell them to stick a cork in it?

 

[reddogs]

Sounds good, except I doubt that it would have cut down much on the reports. Then there's those who claim to be SDA, abide by all 28 fundamentals, but don't have the love of God for their fellow human being who is in pain burning within them--can you ban them? Or, tell them to stick a cork in it?

DJ, behave.....

IMHO, that sticky will do fine brother Stone.....

Red

 

[honorthesabbath]

Thats good

 

[djconklin]

Quote:
Originally Posted by djconklin
Sounds good, except I doubt that it would have cut down much on the reports. Then there's those who claim to be SDA, abide by all 28 fundamentals, but don't have the love of God for their fellow human being who is in pain burning within them--can you ban them? Or, tell them to stick a cork in it?


DJ, behave.....

I'm sorry I didn't include the --I thought the "stick a cork in it" would have been enough. OTOH ...

 

[RC_NewProtestants]

I need you guys help here.

We've recently received a whole bunch of reports that i think could have been avoided if we have a

Read here 1st before posting STICKY

so what do you guys say?

I'm thinking it should be simple, stateing that if you are not SDA then your post in this forum should be limited to asking questions and fellowshiping; along with a link to ya'lls wiki?

???

I think that would be fine once the debate/discussion forum is created. We have enough rules for it in place now that we could and should be using it and begin to use the main forum the way that our wiki rules have outlined.

 

[DarylFawcett]

Go for it stone.

 

[IntoTheCrimsonSky]

Fine with this.

 

[smooze]

I think it should be up to ME to moderate this forum. What do you think. Stone has better things to do. m sure you could put a read before posting but it will do no good. Like the split thing is so stupid. There has been separate forums ( sub-forums) all along and a section for NON-christians to ask questions about the ADventist doctrine and beliefs, but alas we still have debates and arguments. When will the madness end.

 

[DarylFawcett]

The madness will, hopefully, end when we have both the new sub-forums and rules up and running.

 

[smooze]

I think it should be up to ME to moderate this forum. What do you think. Stone has better things to do. m sure you could put a read before posting but it will do no good. Like the split thing is so stupid. There has been separate forums ( sub-forums) all along and a section for NON-christians to ask questions about the ADventist doctrine and beliefs, but alas we still have debates and arguments. When will the madness end.

yup

 

[TrustAndObey]

Stone, this was proposed in the wiki for the NEW rules, but I think it's a great idea to have a sticky for our temporary rules too.

Actually, we do have that, but people don't bother reading it first.

If they had to sign it before posting, that would definitely help.