B
Born_to_Lose_Live_to_Win
Guest
I may not agree with the idea that Vedic religion was practised from Japan to Scandinavia but the black stone in the Kabaa intrigues me.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Born_to_Lose_Live_to_Win said:Whatever I may agree with or not, I will never agree with the theory that the Vedic peoples originated in the Russian steppes and entered India.
That theory has no basis and is being questioned at seriously in historical circles.
off_world_beings said:Born to lose....where is that quote from?
Thanks
off_world_beings said:Sorry !!!!. I meant 'Born to Live'.........sorry, I must be projecting myself :-/
Born_to_Lose_Live_to_Win said:I may not agree with the idea that Vedic religion was practised from Japan to Scandinavia but the black stone in the Kabaa intrigues me.
rahul_sharma said:i don't think any sane scholar believes this aryan invasion theory now. More and more people are discarding it after new findings and studies.
rahul_sharma said:i don't think any sane scholar believes this aryan invasion theory now. More and more people are discarding it after new findings and studies.
Ram said:Well, history is decided by ppl who wield power. It is not always scientific and often biased. It is a normal practice to push down dates in the Indian history and accord older dates to other civilizations. When the Indus valley civilization was discovered in the early 20th century, they found it dated very old, so the British stopped funding its excavation(who wants to add credit to India's ancient civilization) . These regions are now in Pakistan which is not so keen to establish the ancient Indian history. When India becomes a super power at some point in future, the truth will come to light in face of unbiased research.
you are right but nothing will change as long as we have Left and Congress mentality powerfull in India. nobody is more anti-hindu than these so called hindus.Ram said:When India becomes a super power at some point in future, the truth will come to light in face of unbiased research.
Born_to_Lose_Live_to_Win said:You are right Rahul.
But there are people who in their excitement to promote the Vedas completely leave India behind as though the Vedas originated in Iran or Russia and then came to India.
That is the tendency I am guarded against.
I don't want to prove that Vedas pervaded the entire world.
But I am unshakeable in my faith that Vedas and India cannot be separated from each other.
Ram said:Well, I dont have any problems if it is established that Vedas came from outside. It is the people that matter not the place. The Bharatvarsha as referred to in the vedas refers only to the human birth. Dont leave the Bharatavarsha as used in those days against sea travel actually meant dont leave your human birth( dont de-evolve) which was misinterpreted in the mediveal period to stop Indians from going abroad.
There is nothing specially sacred about the place called India. How can eternal truths like the vedas have affinity with a geographic location? The whole world belongs to the creator and every spot ion earth s equally sacred. It is the Hindu Philosophy or the Sanathana dharma that is sacred, and it does not matter who originated it and where.
Like you I too would like to beleive however, there was no aryan migration and the oldest civilizations existed in India and vedas originated here. I do not personally think vedic culture(in ritual form) flourished over the entire world, maybe parts of it. But the vedic philosophy is universal.I do not think we must try to interpret Ramayana as a history because it cannot be validated. Ramayana is technically jnana yoga, and that is how I read it. Mahabaratha, on the other hand dates only to 3000 BC and with good research it might be possible to find historic evidence. The main problem with Indian history is if you put King Yudhistira at 3200 B.C and a few kings that followed him, there is no further historical record until about 1500 B.C. These 2000 missing years are the biggest problems in establishing the story of Mahabaratha and earlier Indian history.
rahul_sharma said:you are right but nothing will change as long as we have Left and Congress mentality powerfull in India. nobody is more anti-hindu than these so called hindus.![]()
Born_to_Lose_Live_to_Win said:But India is emotional, and I do not want to change my opinion even if Lord Krishna comes and tells me to get over it already.
Ram said:Congress? I presume this is their last term in office for the near future.
Left - who?![]()
rahul_sharma said:Sanatana dharma concentrating at only one place is affect of kali yuga and hence God's wish. When it was universal in previous yuga's still this place called Bharat(india) must be looked as roots of this eternal philosphy. thats why this root is still strong and alive, ofcourse its branches don't exist now due to affects of this evil yuga. every yuga has its own laws and plays.![]()