Problems with Heliocentrism

lesliedellow · Mar 26, 2017

I'm_Sorry said:
Have you done FE research?

Yes or No?

Is that your standard response when you have got no answer, and you know it?

JohnMartin · Mar 26, 2017

lesliedellow said:
Oh, I see. So the Vatican Observatory is fully signed up to geocentrism, is it? I bet that comes as news to George Coyne.

See if you can find a quote from George Coyne where he denies goecentrism.

JM

JohnMartin · Mar 26, 2017

pitabread said:
Seriously? An honest-for-real geocentrist? Wild.

Yes. See if you can provide any evidence that the earth moves. The evidence has to be exclusive to the moving earth theory. You won't find it.

JM

lesliedellow · Mar 26, 2017

pitabread said:
Seriously? An honest-for-real geocentrist? Wild.

You haven't heard the worst of it. There are flat earthers on this forum as well. The first time I encountered one, I just knew he had to be a poe, but, to my amazement, he wasn't.

JohnMartin · Mar 26, 2017

lesliedellow said:
You haven't heard the worst of it. There are flat earthers on this forum as well. The first time I encountered one, I just knew he had to be a poe, but, to my amazement, he wasn't.

Modern cosmology is acentric. How can this acentrism be proven? I don't think it can.

Modern cosmology assumes there is no special location in the universe. How can the Copernican principle be proven? I don't think it can.

JM

I'm_Sorry · Mar 26, 2017

Are We Living on a Flat Earth?

pitabread · Mar 26, 2017

lesliedellow said:
You haven't heard the worst of it. There are flat earthers on this forum as well. The first time I encountered one, I just knew he had to be a poe, but, to my amazement, he wasn't.

I don't think I could believe Flat Earthers actually exist. That's just too far-fetched a belief.

I'm_Sorry · Mar 26, 2017

pitabread said:
I don't think I could believe Flat Earthers actually exist. That's just too far-fetched a belief.

Last 500 years in earths history = Heliocentric, Globe Earth, pale blue dot, monkey men.

Space made in a Hollywood basement.

USincognito · Mar 26, 2017

lesliedellow said:
The Book of Enoch is not even canonical, and that is your excuse for waving good bye to reality?

I'm_Sorry said:
Neither is Darwin's theory of evolution.

I love the smell of non sequiturs in the morning.

USincognito · Mar 26, 2017

Joshua_5 said:
So the Sun doesn't undergo nuclear fusion. So what?

Oh my....

PsychoSarah · Mar 26, 2017

I'm_Sorry said:
Have you done FE research?

Yes or No?

Yes, I've dedicated more time to it than most people that don't support it. I make an effort to give every idea a chance. And there is quite a bit of variation in ideas as to how the Earth could be flat.

The ones that don't rely on ridiculous global conspiracies that aren't even feasible or make sense often rely upon improper measurements, outdated papers, and not understanding what sorts of results you should even get to indicate a flat earth.

So, as an example, a claim that the planet is a flat disk, with all land masses on one side. THEN WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER SIDE?! We'd have observed ages ago that there was only so far a person could go before ending up at the edge to where the dark side is. Because you know, in that model, the sun is tiny and spins around above the flat Earth like a ball on a string.

There are just tons of different proposals, like a flat Earth curved around like a tube that the sun goes around. However, the most common model I have seen is a flat Earth in the shape of a circle with all the familiar land mass on one side, the sun and moon doing a circular motion above, with a dome-like outer space and atmosphere.

I'm_Sorry · Mar 26, 2017

USincognito said:
I love the smell of non sequiturs in the morning.

Back in your corner atheist.

Nothing begot something.
Non-life begot life.

Statement of my position to the Atheist, Agnostic, Gnostic, Theist:

Ok, I'm a faithful Believer in the Bible being the true revelation of God by His work, by His Word Jesus Christ.

So I = Faith Position = God did this.

Agnostic Position = God may or may not do it.

Atheist = Null position = No God, No doing this.

Athiest------------------------Agnostic------------------------Theist

This is a science subforum of a Christian forum correct?

So, my position is that the method of science cannot prove God because God Himself is hidden but His work is visible (Faith is the requirement for His creation).

When you question my claims, I repeatedly state that to the atheist there are gaps in his position, namely "Origins" and that theories are in error and could be instead "xyz" based on "God did it".

I cut accepted theory down by Faith in the bible and its creation account (testimony) of the revelation of God's creation, to His creation, by Himself.

Then proceed to explain how I believe the position of Atheism is wrong to state the following in philosophy:

Nothing begot Something.
Non-Life begot Life.

I believe that the flat earth theory IF proven will rock the foundations of science.

Gnosis the lie:
God Made This

I'm_Sorry · Mar 26, 2017

USincognito said:
Oh my....

Oh my you believe something that cant be reproduce in a lab. because it supports null.

USincognito · Mar 26, 2017

I'm_Sorry said:
NASA lies and Photoshop skills and Stanley Kubrick lunar models and light filming skills.

It's easy to argue when you can just make stuff up.

I'm_Sorry · Mar 26, 2017

PsychoSarah said:
Yes, I've dedicated more time to it than most people that don't support it. I make an effort to give every idea a chance. And there is quite a bit of variation in ideas as to how the Earth could be flat.

First scientist up up and down

"Now after Piccard got up there, what did he see? “It seems a disk with upturned edges.”"

USincognito · Mar 26, 2017

I'm_Sorry said:
I'm not going to waste my time..

Says the Flurfer.

lesliedellow · Mar 26, 2017

JohnMartin said:
See if you can find a quote from George Coyne where he denies goecentrism.

JM

"I think it's correct to say that Christianity has always had sort of an ability to absorb the developments in science. But, it's always done it very slowly. So take the Copernican revolution, it took the church centuries before it realized that the Copernican revolution was actually a contribution to the life of the church, the development of our view of ourselves in terms of the Universe, and therefore our view of God, et cetera. But, that took centuries, and struggles, and conflicts before that happened."

George Coyne

I'm_Sorry · Mar 26, 2017

USincognito said:
It's easy to argue when you can just make stuff up.

Sound like Gnostic scientism

USincognito · Mar 26, 2017

pitabread said:
I don't think I could believe Flat Earthers actually exist. That's just too far-fetched a belief.

And yet here you go. Three of them posting to one thread.

I'm_Sorry · Mar 26, 2017

USincognito said:
Says the Flurfer.

Say the "I believe anything that the gov teaches me in school curriculum."

Yeah you've never gone above 40 odd thousand feet.

Problems with Heliocentrism

Member

Active Member

Active Member

Member

Active Member

Taking a break from CF

Well-Known Member

Taking a break from CF

a post by Alan Smithee

a post by Alan Smithee

Chaotic Neutral

Taking a break from CF

Taking a break from CF

a post by Alan Smithee

Taking a break from CF

a post by Alan Smithee

Member

Taking a break from CF

a post by Alan Smithee

Taking a break from CF

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency