- Mar 18, 2014
- 38,117
- 34,056
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Recommend you read the entire book of Romans. You would not be making the above post if you read chapter two.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Recommend you read the entire book of Romans. You would not be making the above post if you read chapter two.This cannot possible mean that before the law there was no knowledge of sin. Do you see that? The law came with Moses. Do you think no one knew about sin before that day? And I did not say that this is not true. I said God said that the law he was giving them that day was not too hard for them. You are disagreeing with God Almighty. Don't you want to instead try to understand the matter?
I know it quite well. Have you read the entire Bible focusing particularly on direct quotes from God? I can assure you, you will not like what God has to say about sin and man and the choices men make and the freedom to do so. You will not find him boasting about his sovereignity and men do always what he wants. But you might get a taste of what it is like for God to speak to you instead of Calvin.Recommend you read the entire book of Romans. You would not be making the above post if you read chapter two.
You quoted very few verses devoid of exegesis.I know it quite well. Have you read the entire Bible focusing particularly on direct quotes from God? I can assure you, you will not like what God has to say about sin and man and the choices men make and the freedom to do so. You will not find him boasting about his sovereignity and men do always what he wants. But you might get a taste of what it is like for God to speak to you instead of Calvin.
Red, I am going to work now and signing off but I ask myself what good this is doing. You want your Calvinism and cannot address directly the verses I bring up. Instead you retreat to the calvinist twist on verses that have nothing to do with the subject.
In a previous site, I have found that most calvinists are militant about their calvinism. T hey attack and when faced with direct verses that destory their postion, they launch a personal attack and run for cover. I can understand why. Calvinism offers eternal security that assures them heaven no matter what they do to whom. Whether God offers this or not remains to be seen.
You mean the Textus Receptus ?Talking about Calvin over and over
is like talking about Ruckman over and over
or going to the 24 reconstructed Greek N.T.
which do not match in content, volume and doctrine.
Let's look at the most published, distributed, translated,
preached and believed Holy Bible of all time,
and not conduct an abstract re-canonization of manuscripts
and selection of Greek word definitions.
The Holy Spirit already did that, you're 400 years to late !
Be sincere, you know that the textus receptus is not the most published,You mean the Textus Receptus ?
trying to figure out how he came to the conclusion in the first place as he keeps telling us it's all in the Greek.
Be sincere, you know that the textus receptus is not the most published,
distributed, translated, preached and believe Book of all time !
Thanks for the compliment that you were actually entertaining my theology. Doesn’t come from Prom- as i’ve never read his stuff. But labels are useful when someone’s position is challenging.You quoted very few verses devoid of exegesis.
I will no longer entertain your Promethean theology.
Lol yeah I get it the Bible. But you mean the KJV which used the Textus Receptus (RT) right?Be sincere, you know that the textus receptus is not the most published,
distributed, translated, preached and believe Book of all time !
The best translation of bible. What bible are you talking about ?The most published, distributed, translated, preached and believed book of all time is, of course, the Bible.
The best translation of the Bible is probably the ESV.
I didn't realize Baptists have an infallible human magisterium. You swimming in the Tiber?This is a perfect example of what happens
when you have no final authority beyond
an refined sola scriptura theory
with theory no final canonization.
No, the Beza text was the primary reconstructed Greek N.T. text,Lol yeah I get it the Bible. But you mean the KJV which used the Textus Receptus (RT) right?
The RT was probably the best available in the West at the time of before and during the Reformation. Since then there have been a plethora of manuscripts made available.
I usually point out that Erasmus filled in the RT blanks by translating the Latin Vulgate back into Greek. He also heavily relied on the quotes and commentary of the early church fathers.
Yes I noticed and I apologize if my post was not clear.Right. I see.
I'm still waiting for a reply from him on #862 on the same question.
Yes I noticed and I apologize if my post was not clear.
He said the answer was in the Greek, you showed the Greek. I'm guessing we will get his own translation.
You're right !Yes I noticed and I apologize if my post was not clear.
He said the answer was in the Greek, you showed the Greek. I'm guessing we will get his own translation.
The answer is the one that Jesus gave. It was NECESSARY. Now what you are doing is mistaking God knowing for God therefore determining. If you drop a hammer, do you know it will fall and therefore MAKE it fall? Knowing is not determining. Jesus gave us Gods motive. He was explaining the ways of God. If a person wants to understand God, this is vital.No. Satan tempted Eve, not God. Please do not deflect:
I will ask you why God put the Tree there, you'll reply: "To give Adam and Eve a choice", in which I will ask "How could there be any other choice than the one that God foreknew would happen; even before the Tree or the humans ever existed?"
I wish to address that directly.
And stay in that baby Christian place your whole life? That’s it?I prefer to accept the Kingdom of Heaven as a child.
No you don’t. I gave you a direct quote from Jesus as to why there is temptation and you saw it as deflection. You reject His answer to your question.I prefer to accept the Kingdom of Heaven as a child. I do so by accepting Scripture, all of it.
So you think God protects a mans faith but not the body. Why did say Jesus many will fall away from the faith then?Does physical life have equal value to spiritual life? We're talking about salvation here.
If you think men always do the will of God or that God wills men to do evil, the Bible will not support that thinking. That’s all I meant.That's simply awful. Why would you say that? I will never do it, sister.
There are no original N.T. Greek manuscripts.
There are over 24 Greek N.T. Texts
which do not match
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?