S
Steezie
Guest
If the disease is contracted through normal circumstances then of course there is. When that disease is caused by direct human action and leads to the death of the child, then no there isnt a difference.So is there no differance between a disease and murder?
Lung cancer from second-hand smoke and diabeties from excess sugar is human-created, not other-worldly inspired.Catching a disease is outside of moral consideration, unless you want to debate whether or not God has morals, but intentionally choosing to end the life of any person, be it an unborn child or not, is far from outside morality.
You may not but thousands of people do, I dont see you protesting against shops that sell cigarettes or boycotting companies that load foods with sugar.No, neither lung cancer nor diabetes are good, but then again I don't intentionally inflict them on somebody, either.
Lung disease caused by direct human action that results in the death of someone IS murder. In California, if you have sex with someone and knowingly have HIV, you are required to notify that person because if they die an HIV-related death after sex with you (Provided they contract the disease) you can be charged with first degree murder if you didnt notify that person.Your comparing of a disease to an intentional murder is almost laughable, if it weren't such a sad reflection of how low a price our society has put on human life.
Upvote
0